help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vande Wiele, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warren, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vande Wiele, R. L.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 40, 601-611, Copyright © 1975 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

The significance of weight loss in the evaluation of pituitary response to LH-RH in women with secondary amenorrhea

MP Warren, R Jewelewicz, I Dyrenfurth, R Ans, S Khalaf and RL Vande Wiele

Sixteen women with amenorrhea occurring in the setting of severe self- imposed weight loss and 18 women with secondary amenorrhea due to other causes were given LH-RH (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone). Women with weight loss were found to be unresponsive to LH-RH when severely underweight. FSH responsiveness returned in a linear fashion as weight gain occurred and was not related to estrogen levels. LH responsiveness also returned with weight gain although the relationship was not linear but exponential and a sudden increase in responsiveness occurred at 15% below ideal weight. No relationship to estrogen levels could be found. Women who experienced amenorrhea in a setting other than weight loss did not demonstrate responsiveness to LH-RH which could be correlated with body mass, even when underweight. Women who experienced amenorrhea with weight loss had a consistently lower LH response to LH-RH than the second group and their LH response was always lower than the FSH response. On the other hand, a variety of patterns was found in women with amenorrhea due to other causes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. Weimann
Gender-related differences in elite gymnasts: the female athlete triad
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 2146 - 2152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Frisch
Malnutrition and fertility
Science, March 5, 1982; 215(4537): 1272 - 1274.
[PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. E. FRISCH
Menarche and Fatness: Reexamination of the Critical Body Composition Hypothesis
Science, June 30, 1978; 200(4349): 1509 - 1513.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1975 by The Endocrine Society