help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santen, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bardin, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Santen, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bardin, C. W.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 47, 1220-1229, Copyright © 1978 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Prolonged negative feedback suppression after estradiol administration: proposed mechanism of eugonadal secondary amenorrhea

RJ Santen, JN Friend, D Trojanowski, B Davis, E Samojlik and CW Bardin

The finding of normal gonadotropin and estradiol levels in eugonadal women with secondary amenorrhea suggests a disordered feedback relationship of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. To identify possible defects in negative and positive feedback, we compared the effects of five daily injections of 17 beta-estradiol (E2) in 13 normal women and 11 eugonadal patients with absent cyclic menses. The suppression phase of negative feedback was normal, as LH and FSH were similarly lowered in both groups on day 3. Continued LH (P less than 0.01) and FSH (P less than 0.02) inhibition on day 10 of the protocol, 5 days after the last E2 injection, indicated a defect in the recovery phase of negative feedback in the 11 amenorrheic women. In the 4 patients studied gonadotropin suppression persisted for 3 weeks, E2 did not blunt pituitary responsiveness to GnRH in the amenorrheic women, suggesting a central nervous system site for prolonged gonadotropin inhibition. Nine normal but only 2 amenorrheic women X2 = 4.15; P less than 0.05) exhibited a positive feedback increase in LH on days 4-6. We propose that a defect in the recovery phase of negative feedback to E2 rather than absent positive feedback may be the dominant physiological abnormality which causes secondary amenorrhea by preventing early follicular phase gonadotropin increments and follicular maturation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1978 by The Endocrine Society