| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From The Clinical Research Centers |
Departments of Pediatrics and Physiology (M.B.), University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Endocrine Section, Medical Service (A.I.), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salem, Virginia 24153; Gerontology Section (T.M.), Virginia Commonwealth University, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia 23249; and Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, General Clinical Research Center, Center for Biomathematical Technology (J.D.V.), University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. J. D. Veldhuis, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Box 202, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. E-mail: JDV{at}Virginia.Edu
The present study tests the clinical hypothesis that aging impairs homeostatic adaptations of cortisol secretion to stress. To this end, we implemented a short-term 3.5-day fast as an ethically acceptable metabolic stressor in eight young (ages 1835 yr) and eight older (ages 6072 yr) healthy men. Volunteers were studied in randomly ordered fed vs. fasting sessions. To capture the more complex dynamics of cortisols feedback control, blood was sampled every 10 min for 24 h for later RIA of serum cortisol concentrations and quantitation of the pulsatile, entropic, and 24-h rhythmic modes of cortisol release using deconvolution analysis, the approximate entropy statistic, and cosine regression, respectively. The stress of fasting elevated the mean (24-h) serum cortisol concentration equivalently in the two age cohorts [i.e. from 7.2 ± 0.35 to 11.6 ± 0.71 µg/dL in young men and from 7.7 ± 0.39 to 12.6 ± 0.59 µg/dL in older individuals (P < 10-7)]. The rise in integrated cortisol output was driven mechanistically by selective augmentation of cortisol secretory burst mass (P = 0.002). The resultant daily (pulsatile) cortisol secretion rate increased significantly but equally in young (from 94 ± 6.3 to 151 ± 15 µg/dL·day) and older (from 85 ± 5.4 to 145 ± 7.3 µg/dL·day) volunteers (P < 10-4). Nutrient restriction also prompted a marked reduction in the quantifiable regularity of (univariate) cortisol release patterns in both cohorts (P < 10-4). However, older men showed loss of joint synchrony of cortisol and LH secretion even in the fed state, which failed to change with metabolic stress (P < 10-6). In addition, older individuals maintained a premature (early-day) cortisol elevation in the fed state and unexpectedly evolved an anomalous further cortisol phase advance of 99 ± 16 min during fasting (P < 10-5). Caloric deprivation in aging men also disproportionately elevated the mesor of 24-h rhythmic cortisol release (P = 10-7) and elicited a greater increment in the mean day-night variation in cortisol secretory-burst mass (P < 0.01 vs. young controls). Lastly, short-term caloric depletion in older subjects paradoxically normalized their age-associated suppression of the 24-h rhythm in cortisol interburst intervals.
In summary, acute metabolic stress in healthy aging men (compared with young individuals) unmasks distinct, albeit complex, disruption of cortisol homeostasis. These dynamic anomalies impact the feedback-dependent and time-sensitive coupling of pulsatile and 24-h rhythmic cortisol secretion. Nutrient-withdrawal stress in the older male heightens the cortisol phase disparity already evident in fed elderly individuals. Conversely, the stress of fasting in young men paradoxically reproduces selected features of the aging unstressed (fed) cortisol axis; viz., abrogation of joint cortisol-LH synchrony and suppression of the normal diurnal variation in cortisol burst frequency. Whether fasting would unveil analogous disruption of feedback-dependent control of the corticotropic axis in healthy aging women is not yet known.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Iranmanesh and J. D Veldhuis Hypocortisolemic clamp unmasks jointly feedforward- and feedback-dependent control of overnight ACTH secretion Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 159(5): 561 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Shapses and C. S. Riedt Bone, Body Weight, and Weight Reduction: What Are the Concerns? J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1453 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Darzy, R. D. Murray, H. K. Gleeson, S. S. Pezzoli, M. O. Thorner, and S. M. Shalet The Impact of Short-Term Fasting on the Dynamics of 24-Hour Growth Hormone (GH) Secretion in Patients with Severe Radiation-Induced GH Deficiency J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 987 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Darzy and S. M. Shalet Absence of Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) Neurosecretory Dysfunction but Increased Cortisol Concentrations and Production Rates in ACTH-Replete Adult Cancer Survivors after Cranial Irradiation for Nonpituitary Brain Tumors J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5217 - 5225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Smith, L. Betancourt, and Y. Sun Molecular Endocrinology and Physiology of the Aging Central Nervous System Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2005; 26(2): 203 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Misra, K. K. Miller, C. Almazan, K. Ramaswamy, W. Lapcharoensap, M. Worley, G. Neubauer, D. B. Herzog, and A. Klibanski Alterations in Cortisol Secretory Dynamics in Adolescent Girls with Anorexia Nervosa and Effects on Bone Metabolism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2004; 89(10): 4972 - 4980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cifuentes, C. S Riedt, R. E Brolin, M P. Field, R. M Sherrell, and S. A Shapses Weight loss and calcium intake influence calcium absorption in overweight postmenopausal women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2004; 80(1): 123 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, A. Iranmanesh, D. Naftolowitz, N. Tatham, F. Cassidy, and B. J. Carroll Corticotropin Secretory Dynamics in Humans under Low Glucocorticoid Feedback J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2001; 86(11): 5554 - 5563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |