This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McDonald, C. Articles by Finegood, D. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McDonald, C. Articles by Finegood, D. T.

Minimal-Model Estimates of Insulin Sensitivity Are Insensitive to Errors in Glucose Effectiveness¹

Diabetes Research Laboratory (C.M., D.T.F.), School of Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada; and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (A.D.), Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Diane T. Finegood, Ph.D., School of Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Room K9625, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada. E-mail: finegood{at}sfu.ca

The minimal-model method allows for estimation of insulin sensitivity (S_I = P₃/P₂) and glucose effectiveness (S_G = P₁) from the time course of glucose and insulin after a glucose bolus. We previously demonstrated that the minimal-model results in overestimates of S_G in subjects with normal insulin secretory function. To determine whether overestimation of S_G has an impact on estimation of S_I, we examined model estimation of S_I when S_G was constrained to levels below that found by the regular minimal-model fit. Fifty-six glucose tolerance tests from lean and obese women, with and without polycystic ovary syndrome, were used. S_I ranged from 0.2–22.6 x 10^-4 min^-1/(µU/mL), and S_G ranged from 0.8–3.8 x 10^-2 min^-1 for the standard minimal-model fits. Constraining S_G to as low as 40% of the unconstrained value resulted in a 4-fold increase in P₂ and P₃, but only a 3% reduction in S_I. We conclude that estimation of the insulin sensitivity index is independent of errors in minimal-model-derived estimates of glucose effectiveness.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Brandou, J. F. Brun, E. Raynaud, and J. Mercier Authors' Response: Limited Accuracy of Surrogates of Insulin Resistance during Puberty in Obese and Lean Children at Risk for Altered Glucoregulation J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4419 - 4419. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Pacini, K. Thomaseth, and B. Ahren Contribution to glucose tolerance of insulin-independent vs. insulin-dependent mechanisms in mice Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2001; 281(4): E693 - E703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]