help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0734
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watterberg, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Backstrom, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watterberg, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Backstrom, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Pediatric Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 12 6380-6385
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Effect of Dose on Response to Adrenocorticotropin in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants

Kristi L. Watterberg, Michele L. Shaffer, Jeffery S. Garland, Elizabeth H. Thilo, Mark C. Mammel, Robert J. Couser, Susan W. Aucott, Corinne L. Leach, Cynthia H. Cole, Jeffrey S. Gerdes, Henry J. Rozycki and Conra Backstrom

Division of Neonatology (K.L.W.) and General Clinical Research Center (C.B.), University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131; Health Evaluation Sciences (M.L.S.), The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033; St. Joseph Regional Medical Center (J.S.G.), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53210; Department of Pediatrics (E.H.T.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado 80262; Department of Pediatrics (M.C.M.), Children’s Hospital of St. Paul, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101; Division of Neonatology (R.J.C.), Children’s Hospital and Clinics of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55102; Department of Pediatrics (S.W.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; Department of Pediatrics (C.L.L.), State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260; Department of Pediatrics (C.H.C.), Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111; Newborn Pediatrics (J.S.G.), Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107; and Department of Pediatrics (H.J.R.), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Kristi L. Watterberg, M.D., Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology, MSC10 5590, 1, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001. E-mail: kwatterberg{at}salud.unm.edu.

Context: Various cosyntropin doses are used to test adrenal function in premature infants, without consensus on appropriate dose or adequate response.

Objective: The objective of this study was to test the cortisol response of extremely low birth weight infants to different cosyntropin doses and evaluate whether these doses differentiate between groups of infants with clinical conditions previously associated with differential response to cosyntropin.

Design: The design was a prospective, nested study conducted within a randomized clinical trial of low-dose hydrocortisone from November 1, 2001, to April 30, 2003.

Setting: The setting was nine newborn intensive care units.

Patients: The patients included infants with 500–999 g birth weight.

Intervention: The drug used was cosyntropin, at 1.0 or 0.1 µg/kg, given between 18 and 28 d of birth.

Main Outcome Measure: We measured the cortisol response to cosyntropin.

Results: Two hundred seventy-six infants were tested. Previous hydrocortisone treatment did not suppress basal or stimulated cortisol values. Cosyntropin, at 1.0 vs. 0.1 µg/kg, yielded higher cortisol values (P < 0.001) and fewer negative responses (2 vs. 21%). The higher dose, but not the lower dose, showed different responses for girls vs. boys (P = 0.02), infants receiving enteral nutrition vs. not (P < 0.001), infants exposed to chorioamnionitis vs. not (P = 0.04), and those receiving mechanical ventilation vs. not (P = 0.02), as well as a positive correlation with fetal growth (P = 0.03). A response curve for the 1.0-µg/kg dose for infants receiving enteral nutrition (proxy for clinically well infants) showed a 10th percentile of 16.96 µg/dl. Infants with responses less than the 10th percentile had more bronchopulmonary dysplasia and longer length of stay.

Conclusions: A cosyntropin dose of 0.1 µg/kg did not differentiate between groups of infants with clinical conditions that affect response. We recommend 1.0 µg/kg cosyntropin to test adrenal function in these infants.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society