This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Redman, L. M. Articles by Norman, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Redman, L. M. Articles by Norman, R. J. Related Collections Female Endocrinology Metabolism Obesity

Effect of a Synthetic Progestin on the Exercise Status of Sedentary Young Women

Exercise Physiology Research Unit (L.M.R.), Discipline of Physiology, and Reproductive Medicine Unit (L.M.R., G.W., R.J.N.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide; and Department of Thoracic Medicine (G.C.S.), Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Leanne M. Redman, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808-4124. E-mail: Leanne.Redman{at}PBRC.edu.

Context: The impact of progestins on exercise performance in women has not been previously studied.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a synthetic progestin on aspects of exercise status in young women.

Design, Patients, Setting: Twenty-three young, healthy, habitually sedentary women participated in a single-blind, randomized, counterbalanced, cross-over study in a university-based laboratory setting.

Intervention: Two monophasic oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) were administered in which the dose of the synthetic progestin, norethisterone, was 2-fold different but the dose of the synthetic estrogen, ethinyl estradiol, was constant. During each month of OCP aspects of exercise status were assessed during incremental exercise to exhaustion and steady-state submaximal exercise and with a performance test.

Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were peak oxygen uptake (O_2peak), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), time to exhaustion, lactate concentrations, and total work done.

Results: Peak heart rates were approximately 95% of age-predicted values with both OCP preparations, whereas O_2peak was approximately 30% above age-predicted values. Peak postincremental exercise plasma lactate concentrations exceeded those reported for males and females, whereas the RER was below expected values throughout both incremental and steady-state exercise. The effects on O_2peak and RER were increased with the higher dose progestin OCP, as were exercise time to exhaustion and total work done.

Conclusion: Synthetic progestins in OCP formulations can have a significant effect on the exercise status of young, sedentary women, possibly through an effect on stroke volume and a shift in the principal energy substrate used during exercise from carbohydrate to lipid.