This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Park, H. A. Articles by Cauley, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Park, H. A. Articles by Cauley, J. A. Related Collections Calcium and Bone Metabolism Metabolism

Effects of Weight Control during the Menopausal Transition on Bone Mineral Density

Seoul Paik Hospital (H.A.P.), College of Medicine, University of Inje, Seoul 100-032, Korea; Department of Foods and Nutrition (J.S.L.), University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30603; and Department of Epidemiology (L.H.K., J.A.C.), Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261

Address all correspondence to: Jane A. Cauley, Dr.P.H., University of Pittsburgh, Department of Epidemiology, 130 DeSoto Street, A524 Crabtree Hall, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261. E-mail: jcauley{at}edc.pitt.edu.

Background: Studies of weight loss and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) have primarily been short-term trials in obese subjects.

Objective: We examined the effects of a 5-yr intervention designed to prevent menopausal weight gain or promote modest weight loss on BMD in premenopausal women participating in the Women’s Healthy Lifestyle Project.

Design: We enrolled 373 premenopausal women (age 44–50 yr) and randomly assigned them to either lifestyle intervention (175 women, low-fat dietary modification, weight loss, and physical activity intervention) or control group (198 women). BMD and body weight were measured at baseline, annual follow-up visits (18, 30, 42, and 54 months), and two postintervention follow-ups (66 and 78 months). BMD was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry.

Results: Over the 54 months of intervention, women in the intervention group lost 0.4 kg, whereas control women gained 2.6 kg (P = 0.011). The intervention group experienced significantly greater hip bone loss (–0.20%/yr) than the control group (–0.03%/yr). During the postintervention, differences in rates of bone loss disappeared. When considering both menopausal status and use of hormone therapy (HT), the annualized BMD changes were lower in women reporting HT use; nevertheless, among women on HT, those who lost more than 3% body weight experienced greater total hip BMD loss (–0.25%/yr) compared with those who gained weight (–0.02%/yr) (P = 0.025).

Conclusions: Women randomized to a lifestyle intervention aimed at preventing menopausal weight gain or promoting modest weight loss experienced greater rates of hip bone loss than control women.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. N. Ealey, J. Kaludjerovic, M. C. Archer, and W. E. Ward Adiponectin Is a Negative Regulator of Bone Mineral and Bone Strength in Growing Mice Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2008; 233(12): 1546 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Weight Control and Bone Density During the Menopausal Transition Journal Watch (General), October 30, 2007; 2007(1030): 1 - 1. [Full Text]

				E. Barrett-Connor and C. A. Stuenkel Lifestyle Intervention and Postmenopausal Bone Density J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 3777 - 3779. [Full Text] [PDF]