help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on November 6, 2009
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2009-1850
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lenders, J. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenhofer, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lenders, J. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenhofer, G.

Submitted on August 31, 2009
Accepted on October 21, 2009

Low Sensitivity of Glucagon Provocative Testing for Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma

Jacques W. M. Lenders*, Karel Pacak, Thanh-Truc Huynh, Yehonatan Sharabi, Massimo Mannelli, Gennady Bratslavsky, David S. Goldstein, Stefan R. Bornstein, and Graeme Eisenhofer

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine (J.W.M.L.), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Section on Reproductive Biology and Medicine Branch (K.P., T.-T.H.), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; Urologic Oncology Branch (G.B.), Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, and Clinical Neurocardiology Section (D.S.G.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; Department of Clinical Pathophysiology (M.M.), University of Florence, I-50014 Florence, Italy; Hypertension Unit C (Y.S.), Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel; and Department of Internal Medicine III (G.E., J.W.M.L., S.R.B.), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.lenders{at}aig.umcn.nl.

Context: Pheochromocytomas can usually be confirmed or excluded using currently available biochemical tests of catecholamine excess. Follow-up tests are, nevertheless, often required to distinguish false-positive from true-positive results. The glucagon stimulation test represents one such test; its diagnostic utility is, however, unclear.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic power of the glucagon test to exclude or confirm pheochromocytoma.

Design, Setting, and Subjects: Glucagon stimulation tests were carried out at three specialist referral centers in 64 patients with pheochromocytoma, 38 patients in whom the tumor was excluded, and in a reference group of 36 healthy volunteers.

Main Outcome Measures: Plasma concentrations of norepinephrine and epinephrine were measured before and after glucagon administration. Several absolute and relative test criteria were used for calculating diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Expression of the glucagon receptor was examined in pheochromocytoma tumor tissue from a subset of patients.

Results: Larger than 3-fold increases in plasma norepinephrine after glucagon strongly predicted the presence of a pheochromocytoma (100% specificity and positive predictive value). However, irrespective of the various criteria examined, glucagon-provoked increases in plasma catecholamines revealed the presence of the tumor in less than 50% of affected patients. Diagnostic sensitivity was particularly low in patients with pheochromocytomas due to von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. Tumors from these patients showed no significant expression of the glucagon receptor.

Conclusion: The glucagon stimulation test offers insufficient diagnostic sensitivity for reliable exclusion or confirmation of pheochromocytoma. Because of this and the risk of hypertensive complications, the test should be abandoned in routine clinical practice.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2009 by The Endocrine Society