help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holterhus, P.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinkmann, A. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holterhus, P.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinkmann, A. O.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 11 3584-3589
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Mosaicism due to a Somatic Mutation of the Androgen Receptor Gene Determines Phenotype in Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome1

Paul-Martin Holterhus2, Hennie T. Brüggenwirth, Olaf Hiort, Annette Kleinkauf-Houcken, Klaus Kruse, Gernot H. G. Sinnecker and Albert O. Brinkmann

Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Lübeck (P.M.H., O.H., K.K., G.H.G.S.), Lübeck, Germany; the Department of Endocrinology and Reproduction, Erasmus University (H.T.B., A.O.B.), Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and the Department of Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital (A.K.H.), Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Paul-Martin Holterhus, M.D., Department for Pediatrics, Medical University of Lübeck, Kahlhorststrasse 31–35, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Premature stop codons of the human androgen receptor (AR) gene are usually associated with a complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. We, however, identified an adult patient with a 46,XY karyotype carrying a premature stop codon in exon 1 of the AR gene presenting with signs of partial virilization: pubic hair Tanner stage 4 and clitoral enlargement. No other family members were affected. A point mutation at codon position 172 of the AR gene was detected that replaced the original TTA (Leu) with a premature stop codon TGA (opal). Careful examination of the sequencing gel, however, also identified a wild-type allele, indicating a mosaicism. In addition, elimination of the unique AflII recognition site induced by the mutation was incomplete, thus confirming the coexistence of mutant and wild-type AR alleles in the patient. Normal R1881 binding and a normal 110/112-kDa AR doublet in Western immunoblots consolidated the molecular genetic data by demonstrating the expression of the wild-type AR in the patient’s genital skin fibroblasts. Transfection analysis revealed that only relatively high plasmid concentrations carrying the mutated AR complementary DNA lead to expression of a shortened AR due to downstream reinitiation at methionine 189. Thus, reinitiation does not play a role in the presentation of the phenotype; rather, the partial virilization is caused by the expression of the wild-type AR due to a somatic mosaic. We conclude that somatic mosaicism of the AR gene can represent a substantial factor for the individual phenotype by shifting it to a higher degree of virilization than expected from the genotype of the mutant allele alone.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE ANDROGEN insensitivity syndrome (AIS) probably represents the most common cause of male pseudohermaphroditism (1). Mutations of the androgen receptor (AR) gene are responsible for a variable degree of impaired androgen action. The AIS phenotypes extend over a broad clinical spectrum ranging from external female genitalia through a large group of subjects with incomplete masculinization and ambiguous genitalia to minimal forms with only slightly diminished virilization and/or infertility (2, 3). However, reliable genotype-phenotype correlations do not exist, and the phenotype can vary even in different patients carrying the same mutation (4, 5, 6).

Single base mutations resulting in amino acid substitutions (missense mutations) represent the most common structural defects of the AR gene in either partial AIS (PAIS) or complete AIS (CAIS) (1, 2, 3, 8). More extensive structural alterations at the protein level can be due to nonsense mutations inducing the formation of a premature translation termination (stop) codon. This may be the result of either the direct conversion of amino acid codons into stop codons through point mutations (9, 10, 11) or the indirect formation after disarrangements of the translational reading frame by frameshift mutations (8, 11, 12, 13). Based on events at the molecular level [truncation of the AR, reduced AR messenger ribonucleic acid level (14, 15), and physiologically insufficient downstream initiation (9)], androgen action is seemingly completely abolished in vivo. As expectedly, in the current literature premature stop codon mutations have exclusively been associated with the CAIS phenotype (9–12; for review, see Ref. 1 and references therein).

To characterize causes for incongruent genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with androgen insensitivity, we investigated an AIS patient with partial virilization of the external genitalia despite the presence of a premature stop codon within the AR gene. Functional studies were performed at the DNA and protein levels, leading to elucidation of the underlying molecular mechanism. We discuss the clinical significance of an almost unrecognized and probably underestimated phenomenon for the clinical treatment and genetic counseling of patients with androgen resistance.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient

A 23-yr-old woman of Polish origin contacted her physician because of primary amenorrhea. Her external genitalia were predominantly female. However, clitoral enlargement to 2.0 cm and pubic hair Tanner stage 4 indicated partial virilization (Fig. 1Go). Orificium urethrae externum and introitus vaginae were separated. No fusion of the posterior labial folds was present. In addition, bilateral axillary hair was observed, and the voice was that of a normal female. Breast development corresponded to Tanner stage 5. Two different karyotype analyses, on blood lymphocytes and on genital skin fibroblasts, displayed a 46,XY karyotype. Serum testosterone (31.2 nmol/L) was in the upper male range, and LH (11.0 U/L) and the LH x testosterone product (343) were elevated (normal LH x testosterone product, <170). As an estimation of in vivo function of the AR, serum sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) was measured before and after 3 days of oral administration of 0.2 mg/kg BW·day of the anabolic steroid stanozolol according to a standardized test protocol (4). Basal SHBG was low but still normal for age (27.8 nmol/L). No decrease in SHBG but, rather, an increase was observed in response to stanozolol. The lowest value corresponded to 112.7% (31.3 nmol/L) of the initial concentration [normal response, 51.4 ± 2.1% (±SE); range, 35.6–62.1%] (4). On laparoscopy, bilateral ivory-colored testis-like structures, each measuring 2–3 cm in length, were demonstrated. No Mullerian remnants were detected. To prevent the patient from further virilization, the gonads were removed. Histological examination revealed testis-specific tissue differentiation with atrophic germinal epithelium and Leydig cell hyperplasia. After gonadectomy, hormone substitution therapy was started with estradiol valerate.



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. External genitalia of the patient, showing pubic hair Tanner stage 4 and clitoral enlargement.

 
Culture conditions of cells

All cells were cultured at 37 C in 5% CO2. Genital skin fibroblasts of the patient, obtained during gonadectomy, and male control fibroblasts, derived from foreskin specimens, were maintained in MEM (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FCS, 1% (vol/vol) MEM nonessential amino acids (Life Technologie), and penicillin (200 IU/mL)-streptomycin (0.2 mg/mL). COS-1 and CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells were cultured in DMEM with the nutrient mix F-12 (Life Technologies), 5% (vol/vol) FCS, and antibiotics. For trans-activation studies, CHO cells were plated in medium containing 5% dextran-charcoal-treated FCS.

Androgen binding studies

Androgen binding studies were performed as previously described (16). In brief, confluent cultures of genital skin fibroblasts were incubated with medium containing increasing concentrations of 17ß-hydroxy-17{alpha}-[3H]methyl-4,9,11-estrotrien-3-one ([3H]R1881; 0.02–3.0 nmol/L) in either the presence or absence of a 200-fold molar excess of unlabeled ligand. All incubations were performed in duplicate. After 1 h at 37 C, 50 µL culture medium were taken from each dish for determination of total counts. Cell monolayers were washed with 2 mL Tris-saline (20 mmol/L Tris and 0.15 mol/L NaCl, pH 7.4) and scraped in 1 mL TEG buffer [20 mmol/L Tris, 1.5 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate, 10% (vol/v) glycerol, 600 µmol/L phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and 500 µmol/L bacitracin, pH 7.4]. After centrifugation of the cell suspensions (10 min, 800 x g), pellets were washed in TEG without protein inhibitors and dissolved in 1 mL 0.5 N NaOH (30 min, 56 C). Five hundred microliters were taken for liquid scintillation counting; 100 µL were used in duplicate for protein determination. Scatchard calculations were performed on a Microsoft Excel Personal Computer software (Microsoft Corp., Richmond, WA).

Immunoblot analysis

Western immunoblot analysis was performed as described previously (17) with only minor changes. Briefly, confluent cultures of genital skin fibroblasts (175 cm2) or transfected COS-1 cells (75 cm2) were lysed in a buffer containing 40 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate, 10% glycerol, 10 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 1% Triton X-100, 0.08% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 600 µmol/L phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and 500 µmol/L bacitracin. AR was immunoprecipitated from whole cell lysates by the monoclonal antibody F39.4 (18) coupled to goat antimouse agarose beads (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE (4% stacking gel and 7% separating gel) for 60 min at 200 V. Electroblotting on cellulose nitrate membranes was performed for 1 h at 100 V. After drying and rinsing several times with PBS-0.1% Tween-20 (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA), the membranes were blocked with PBS, 0.1% Tween-20, and 5% nonfat dry milk (blocking buffer) and subsequently incubated for 1 h in a moist chamber with primary antibody SP197 or SP061 (each diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer), directed against amino acids 1–20 or 301–320 of the AR, respectively (17, 18). As second antibody, an antirabbit peroxidase conjugate (Sigma) was used in a 1:4000 dilution. Protein detection was performed by chemiluminescence using the Renaissance Western Blot Chemiluminescence Reagent (DuPont-New England Nuclear, Boston, MA).

DNA studies

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes according to standard procedures and served as template for the PCR. Exons 1–8 of the AR gene were individually amplified, followed by mutation screening using nonisotopic single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis as reported previously (11, 19, 20). Resulting from an aberrant migration pattern on SSCP, a 414-bp PCR fragment representing segment 2 of exon 1 was purified using the Qiaquick extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and directly sequenced using [{gamma}-32P]ATP end-labeled primers with the Sequenase sequencing kit (Amersham Buchler, Braunschweig, Germany) (19). AflII (New England Biolabs, Beverley, MA) restriction site analysis of the 414-bp exon 1 PCR fragment was performed on genomic DNA derived from either blood leukocytes or genital skin fibroblasts. Several controls for wild-type AR DNA contamination of the PCR reactions were performed by repeating separate experiments in different laboratories and using different genomic DNA preparations. Template-free conditions were always included. The samples were analyzed on a 5% glycerol polyacrylamide gel followed by silver staining.

AR expression vectors and transfections

The human AR expression vector pSVAR0 (22) served as a starting point to create a mutant complementary DNA construct containing the stop codon TGA at codon position 172. After AflII digestion of pSVAR0, the overhanging 5'-ends were blunted by a 15-min incubation with 0.06 U/µL S1 nuclease (Pharmacia). This was followed by BamHI digestion, thus removing a 2318-bp AflII/S1-BamHI fragment from the vector. Two oligonucleotides (5'-TGA-ACT-AGT-CGA-TG-3' and 5'-GAT-CCA-TCG-ACT-AGT-TCA-3') were hybridized to construct a linker containing the TGA stop codon, an additional SpeI site, and a BamHI 5'-overhanging end. Subsequently, the linker fragment was cloned into the prepared vector. In-frame ligation was verified by plasmid sequencing. In a second cloning step, the above-mentioned 2318-bp fragment was recloned into the first step product. The latter was pretreated before ligation by SpeI digestion followed by blunting of the 5'-overhanging SpeI end (S1 nuclease) and an additional BamHI digestion. The final construct pSVAR172-stop was verified for the correct sequence by plasmid sequencing. Construction of the expression vector pSVAR121 representing an N-terminal-deleted AR complementary DNA encompassing codons 189–910 was previously reported by Jenster et al. (23).

CHO and COS-1 cells were maintained as described above and transiently transfected by the calcium phosphate precipitation method (24). For trans-activation studies, CHO cells were cultured in 10-cm2 six-well multidishes, using 12.5–2,500 ng AR expression vector/dish (50–10,000 ng/mL precipitate) and 0.5 µg (2 µg/mL) of the reporter plasmid mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-Luc (Organon, West Orange, NJ) (25), adjusting to a final amount of 5 µg (20 µg/mL) plasmid DNA with the pTZ19 carrier plasmid. Transfections were performed in triplicate in three independent experiments (100–10,000 ng/mL precipitate: two experiments, each performed in triplicate). Twenty-four hours before cell lysis, cells were incubated with medium containing either no hormone or 1 nmol/L R1881 (DuPont-New England Nuclear). Luciferase activity was determined as previously described (25). For studying expression of the AR, 75-cm2 subconfluent cultures of COS-1 cells were transfected with 1.5 µg (1 µg/mL) expression plasmid (pSVAR0, pSVAR121, or pSVAR172-stop, respectively), adjusted to a final amount of 30 µg (20 µg/mL) with the carrier plasmid pTZ19. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were glycerol shocked by a 1.5-min incubation with 15% glycerol-MEM without FCS. Whole cell lysates were generated 24 h later, preceding immunoprecipitation of the AR.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mutation detection analysis

All eight exons of the AR gene of the patient’s genomic DNA were successfully amplified by PCR and resulted in PCR fragments of the predicted length (11). Exons 2–8 were individually amplified in a single step, exon 1 was divided into seven overlapping segments. Because of an abnormal migration pattern on SSCP analysis, the 414-bp segment of exon 1 of the gene was sequenced. At codon position 172, a point mutation, TTA to TGA, was detected that replaced the original leucine residue and created a premature stop codon (opal; Fig. 2Go), thus eliminating a restriction recognition site for the enzyme AflII. In addition to the mutant DNA sequence, the wild-type DNA sequence was observed (Fig. 2Go). To confirm these data, an AflII restriction recognition site analysis of the respective 414-bp PCR fragment was performed. Restriction of PCR products from normal controls lead to the formation of two fragments, 205 and 209 bp in length, respectively. In separate DNA preparations from peripheral blood leukocytes and genital skin fibroblasts of the patient, however, the PCR products were partially digested (Fig. 3Go, lanes 2 and 4, respectively). Hence, sequencing data and restriction site analysis both demonstrate the presence of mutant and wild-type AR DNA sequences in the patient’s blood leukocytes and genital skin fibroblasts. Because karyotype analyses excluded chromosomal mosaicism, and sequencing of the CAG repeat in exon 1 supplemented the presence of only one X-chromosome, mosaicism due to a somatic mutation of the AR gene was considered.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. DNA sequencing of genomic DNA PCR-amplified fragments encompassing codons 170–174 of the AR gene. The left panel represents a male control DNA; the right panel belongs to the index patient. In codon 172, a point mutation leads to a substitution of a T by a G, thus creating a premature stop codon (marked by open arrows). The black arrow indicates the additional presence of the wild-type T band in the patient’s DNA.

 


View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. AflII restriction site analysis of 414-bp genomic DNA PCR fragments derived from the patient (blood leukocytes and genital skin fibroblasts) and a male control (blood leukocytes), respectively. 1, Marker (base pair numbers are indicated at the left); 2, blood leukocyte DNA (patient), AflII digest; 3, blood leukocyte DNA (patient), undigested; 4, genital skin fibroblast DNA (patient), AflII digest; 5, genital skin fibroblast DNA (patient), undigested; 6, blood leukocyte DNA (control), AflII digest; 7, blood leukocyte DNA (control), undigested; 8, no template. Partial digestion of the patient’s DNA is indicated by open arrows and confirms the coexistence of wild-type and mutant AR gene sequences.

 
AR binding characteristics

Androgen-binding properties were studied in a whole cell assay of genital skin fibroblasts using the synthetic androgen methyltrienolone (R1881). In Fig. 4Go, a Scatchard plot is presented that demonstrates specific R1881 binding of genital skin fibroblasts of the patient. The calculation of maximal binding (Bmax) revealed a value of 22.56 fmol/mg protein, which is below the normal male range (39.0–169.0 fmol/mg protein). A normal dissociation constant (Kd) of 0.063 nmol/L was found (normal male range, 0.03–0.13 nmol/L). This result indicates the expression of an AR containing a functionally intact androgen-binding domain.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Scatchard plot representing R1881 binding on genital skin fibroblasts of the patient (specific androgen binding, normal Kd, and low Bmax).

 
Western immunoblot analysis on genital skin fibroblasts

Investigation of AR expression in the patient’s tissue was performed by immunoprecipitation of the AR from whole cell lysates of equally grown confluent cultures of genital skin fibroblasts preceding Western immunoblot analysis. Using the monoclonal antibody F39.4 for immunoprecipitation and the polyclonal antibody SP061 for immunodetection on cellulose nitrate membranes, a normal 110/112-kDa AR doublet was found in the genital skin fibroblasts of the patient (Fig. 5Go, lane 3), indicating expression of the wild-type AR. The signal intensity of the 110/112-kDa band in the patient was always reduced compared to that of the male control genital skin fibroblast strain (Fig. 5Go, lane 2 vs. lane 3). This is in accordance with the low Bmax observed in the Scatchard analysis and could be an indication of a reduced amount of wild-type AR expressed in a given population of genital skin fibroblasts of the patient. However, any quantitative interpretation should be restrained because the ratio of fibroblasts in tissue culture containing either the mutant or the wild-type AR allele does not necessarily reflect in vivo conditions.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Western immunoblot analysis. AR was immunoprecipitated from whole cell lysates from either genital skin fibroblasts or transfected COS-1 cells using the monoclonal antibody F39.4. Immunodetection on Western blot was performed by SP061 (lanes 1–5) and SP197 (lanes 6–8), respectively. Epitopes for antibodies and transfected constructs are illustrated in the scheme (see also in the text). Lane 1, COS-1 cells transfected with pSVAR0 [1/20th lysate from one 75-cm2 culture flask (cf)]; lane 2, genital skin fibroblasts, control male (entire lysate from one 175-cm2 cf); lane 3, genital skin fibroblasts, patient (entire lysate from one 175-cm2 cf); lane 4, COS-1 cells transfected with pSVAR172-stop (1/20th lysate from one 75-cm2 cf); 5, COS-1 cells transfected pSVAR121 (1/20th lysate from one 75-cm2 cf); lane 6, COS-1 cells transfected with pSVAR172-stop (1/20th lysate from one 75-cm2 cf); lane 7, COS-1 cells transfected with pSVAR121 (1/20th lysate from one 75-cm2 cf); lane 8, COS-1 cells transfected with pSVAR0 (1/20th lysate from one 75-cm2 cf). Lane 3 demonstrates the expression of 110/112-kDa wild-type AR in the patient. The signal intensity is considerably reduced compared with that in the control male cell line in lane 2. Lane 5 shows the expression of a 87-kDa AR fragment by pSVAR121 that cannot be recognized by SP197 (lane 7). The same pattern is the case for pSVAR172-stop (lanes 4 and 6, respectively) and is consistent with downstream initiation of translation of a 87-kDa N-terminal truncated AR using Met189 as start codon.

 
Expression study of pSVAR172-stop, pSVAR121, and pSVAR0

AR expression using pSVAR172-stop, pSVAR121, or pSVAR0 expression plasmids has been investigated in transiently transfected COS1 cells. Antibody F39.4 has been used for immunoprecipitation, whereas either SP197 or SP061 served for immunodetection on Western blots. Figure 5Go, lane 1, illustrates the formation of a normal 110/112-kDa AR after transfection of the wild-type AR construct pSVAR0. Construct pSVAR121, encoding amino acids 189–910 (23), demonstrated the expression of the predicted N-terminal-deleted 87-kDa AR fragment using SP061 in immunodetection (Fig. 5Go, lane 5). In accordance, no signal could be obtained using antibody SP197 (Fig. 5Go, lane 7). Remarkably, a weaker band following the same pattern in migration (87 kDa) and immunodetection (SP061, signal; SP197, no signal) as pSVAR121 was found for pSVAR172-stop (Fig. 5Go, lanes 4 and 6, respectively), indicating the expression of an 87-kDa AR fragment most likely caused by downstream initiation of translation at Met189. The 87-kDa band that is visible in lane 3 representing the patient’s genital skin fibroblasts is also consistent with downstream initiation, because no 87-kDa signal could be obtained in a different blot using antibody SP197 (data not shown). Whether the smaller bands in lane 2 representing the control fibroblast strain are also caused by the use of alternative start sites or by proteolysis has not been investigated.

Trans-activation studies

To exclude the possibility that partial virilization of the patient could have been significantly influenced by the N-terminal truncated AR caused by the mutant AR allele, the trans-activation properties of pSVAR172-stop compared with those of pSVAR121 and pSVAR0 were investigated. Induction of the MMTV-Luc reporter plasmid using transiently transfected CHO cells was measured in either the presence or absence of 1 nmol/L R1881. Maximum reporter gene induction by the wild-type AR plasmid pSVAR0 was found using 12.5 ng expression plasmid in transfections of 10-cm2 cultures of CHO cells; a 46.0- fold induction (range, 45.2–46.8) relative to basal activity in the absence of R1881 was observed (Fig. 6Go). Under these conditions, no significant trans-activation of the reporter gene by pSVAR172-stop was present (1.4-fold; range, 0.4–2.6; Fig. 6Go). Only at highly elevated concentrations of pSVAR172-stop could a partial trans-activation of MMTV-Luc be observed, with a maximum induction of 13.0-fold (range, 10.3–15.7) using 1250 ng expression plasmid (5 µg/mL precipitate; Fig. 6Go). With respect to the AR expression studies (Fig. 5Go), this activity is most likely due to the N-terminal-truncated 87-kDa AR caused by downstream initiation. The pSVAR121 expression plasmid represents the same N-terminal truncated AR as the downstream initiation product caused by pSVAR172-stop. Partial trans-activation of the reporter plasmid was observed using pSVAR121 (6.8-fold; range, 5–8.4), corresponding to previously reported data (23) (Fig. 6Go).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Trans-activation study of wild-type and mutant AR expression plasmids. The y-axis represents the fold induction of MMTV-Luc reporter gene in the presence of 1 nmol/L R1881 in relation to basal activity in the absence of hormone. Results of transfections (each performed in triplicate) are indicated by black points (— = mean). On the x-axis, the amount of DNA per mL precipitate is indicated.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To determine factors influencing the genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with AIS, we investigated a PAIS subject with discrepancies among phenotype, genotype, and the result of the SHBG response to stanozolol. The phenotypic appearance with obvious signs of virilization demonstrated significant androgen action in the patient. In contrast, the absent SHBG decrease in response to stanozolol would predict a CAIS phenotype with total abolishment of AR function (4), a striking discrepancy from the clinical observations. Mutation detection analysis revealed a premature stop codon within the N-terminus of the AR gene. This finding again was not consistent with the PAIS phenotype of the patient, as in the current literature premature stop codons within the AR gene have always been associated with CAIS (9–12; for review, see also Refs. 1 and 26).

DNA sequencing and restriction site analysis demonstrated the presence of a somatic mosaic of mutant and wild-type AR alleles in the patient. This was confirmed by the presence of normal androgen-binding properties in cultured genital skin fibroblasts and the detection of a normal 110/112-kDa AR doublet in Western immunoblots, both indicating expression of the wild-type AR. A physiological significance of downstream initiation of translation at Met189 resulting in an 87-kDa AR, as demonstrated in Fig. 5Go, seems unlikely, because only relatively high plasmid concentrations of the pSVAR172-stop plasmid lead to relevant reporter gene induction in cotransfection assays. Different reports by others on premature stop codons of the AR gene in the human (9) as well as in the mouse (27) being associated with partially active N-terminal truncated AR fragments caused by downstream initiation support our findings. The respective phenotypes have always been CAIS despite the occurrence of downstream initiation (9, 27). Thus, we conclude that the partial virilization of our patient is most likely due to the expression of the wild-type AR based on somatic mosaicism. The absent SHBG decrease in response to stanozolol may be due to variations in the tissue distribution of mutant and wild-type AR alleles. One would expect, with respect to this consideration, that liver parenchymatous cells predominantly, if not exclusively, contain the mutant form of AR alleles.

The occurrence of somatic mosaicism in genetic diseases is not a rare event. For example, the McCune-Albright syndrome is due to somatic mutations of the gene coding for the {alpha}-subunit of the G protein (Gs{alpha}) (28, 29). The variability in the severity of clinical manifestations in this disease is consistent with the presence of different ratios of mutated and wild-type alleles in tissues of individual patients (28, 29). Concerning AIS, the possibility of somatic mosaicism hardly received attention in the current literature. Publications dealing with somatic mutations of the AR gene have mostly been restricted to malignant disease (30, 31, 32). To date, only one case of a somatic mutation of the AR gene in AIS has been published (19). Partial virilization of that patient has been suggested to be most likely due to the expression of the wild-type AR based on the somatic mosaic. A comparable animal model has been studied with the XXTfm-Sxr mouse in detail (33, 34). Different ratios of androgen-responsive and -unresponsive cells in the somatic mosaics of these mice are responsible for phenotypes ranging from predominantly male with hypospadias to severely impaired masculinization with predominantly female appearance (33).

Somatic mosaicism of the AR gene represents the first clearly defined mechanism significantly influencing the genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with AIS. Expression of the wild-type AR plays a crucial role in this molecular genetic constellation by shifting the AIS subtype to a higher degree of virilization than expected from the mutant allele alone. For clinical purposes, knowledge about somatic mosaicism of the AR gene in a particular patient with AIS provides important information for further management. First, somatic mosaicism can elucidate possible discrepancies occurring among phenotype, genotype, and the SHBG androgen sensitivity test and therefore be of help in interpretation of the data obtained. Second, it provides the basis for genetic counseling of these families, as the risk for another child with AIS is low if somatic mosaicism is present in the index patient. Third, early gonadectomy is prudent in all patients rendered female to prevent undesired virilization during puberty (clitoromegaly and deepening of the voice) because of presumed partial androgen action.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Marja C. T. Verleun-Mooijman, Traute von Postel, Dagmar Struve, Anke Zöllner, Nicole Homburg, and Andrea Lehners for excellent technical assistance. They are indebted to Prof. Eberhard Schwinger, M.D., Department for Human Genetics, Medical University of Lubeck (Lübeck, Germany), for karyotype analyses and for counseling in somatic mosaicism.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Hi 497/3–2; to O.H.). Presented in part at the 33rd Workshop for Pediatric Research, Göttingen, Germany February 20–21, 1997. Back

2 Recipient of a visiting scholarship from the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology. Back

Received April 2, 1997.

Revised July 30, 1997.

Accepted August 1, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Quigley CA, DeBellis A, Marschke KB, El-Awady MK, Wilson EM, French FS. 1995 Androgen receptor defects: historical, clinical, and molecular perspectives. Endocr Rev. 16:271–321.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Sultan C, Lumbroso S, Poujol N, Belon C, Boudon C, Lobaccaro J-M. 1993 Mutations of androgen receptor gene in androgen insensitivity syndromes. J. Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 46:519–530.
  3. Hiort O, Sinnecker GHG, Holterhus P-M, Nitsche EM, Kruse K. 1996 The clinical and molecular spectrum of androgen insensitivity syndromes. Am J Med Genet. 63:218–222.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Sinnecker GHG, Hiort O, Nitsche EM, Holterhus PM, Kruse K, German Collaborative Intersex Study Group. 1997 Functional assessment and clinical classification of androgen insensitivity in patients with mutations of the androgen receptor gene. Eur J Pediatr. 156:7–14.[Medline]
  5. Rodien P, Mebarki F, Mowszowicz I, et al. 1996 Different phenotypes in a family with androgen insensitivity caused by the same M780I point mutation in the androgen receptor gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2994–2998.[Abstract]
  6. McPhaul MJ, Marcelli M, Zoppi S, Griffin JE, Wilson JD. 1993 Genetic basis of endocrine disease. IV. The spectrum of mutations in the androgen receptor gene that causes androgen resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 76:17–23.[Abstract]
  7. Deleted in proof.
  8. Brinkmann AO, Jenster G, Ris-Stalper C, et al. 1995 Androgen receptor mutations. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 53:443–448.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Zoppi S, Wilson CM, Harbison MD, et al. 1993 Complete testicular feminization caused by an amino-terminal truncation of the androgen receptor with downstream initiation. J Clin Invest. 91:1105–1112.
  10. Trifiro M, Prior RL, Sabbaghian N, et al. 1991 Amber mutation creates a diagnostic MaeI site in the androgen receptor gene of a family with complete androgen insensitivity. Am J Med Genet. 40:493–499.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Hiort O, Wodtke A, Struwe D, Zöllner A, Sinnecker GHG, German Collaborative Intersex Study Group. 1994 Detection of point mutations in the androgen receptor gene using non-isotopic single strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 3:1163–1166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Batch JA, Williams, DM, Davies HR, et al. 1992 Androgen receptor gene mutations identified by SSCP in fourteen subjects with androgen insensitivity syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1:497–503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. He WW, Kumar MV, Tindall DJ. 1991 A frame-shift mutation in the androgen receptor causes complete androgen insensitivity in the testicular-feminized mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:2373–2378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Marcelli M, Tilley WD, Wilson CM, Griffin JE, Wilson JD, McPhaul MJ. 1990 Definition of the human androgen receptor gene structure permits the identification of mutations that cause androgen resistence: premature termination of the receptor protein at amino acid residue 588 causes complete androgen resistence. Mol Endocrinol. 4:1105–1116.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Charest NJ, Zhou Z-X, Lubahn DB, Olsen KL, Wilson EM, French FS. 1991 A frameshift mutation destabilizes androgen receptor messenger RNA in the Tfm mouse. Mol Endocrinol. 5:573–581.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Brüggenwirth HT, Boehmer ALM, Verleun-Mooijman MCT, et al. 1996 Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 58:569–575.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. van Laar JH, Voorhorst-Ogink MM, Zegers ND, et al. 1989 Characterization of polyclonal antibodies against the N-terminal domain of the human androgen receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 67:29–38.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Zegers ND, Claassen E, Neelen C, et al. 1991 Epitope prediction and confirmation for the human androgen receptor: generation of monoclonal antibodies for multi-assay performance following the synthetic peptide strategy. Biochim Biophys Acta1073 :23–32.
  19. Hiort O, Huang Q, Sinnecker GHG, et al. 1993 Single strand conformation polymorphism analysis of androgen receptor gene mutations in patients with androgen insensitivity syndromes: application for diagnosis, genetic counseling, and therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:262–266.[Abstract]
  20. Hiort O, Klauber G, Cendron M, et al. 1994 Molecular characterization of the androgen receptor gene in boys with hypospadias. Eur J Pediatr. 153:317–321.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Deleted in proof.
  22. Brinkmann AO, Faber PW, van Rooij HCJ, et al. 1989 The human androgen receptor: domain structure, genomic organisation and regulation of expression. J Steroid Biochem. 34:307–310.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Jenster G, van der Korput HAGM, Trapman J, Brinkmann AO. 1995 Identification of two transcriptional activation units in the N-terminal domain of the human androgen receptor. J Biol Chem. 270:7341–7346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Chen C, Okayama H. 1987 High-efficiency transformation of mammalien cells by plasmid DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 7:2745–2752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. de Ruiter PE, Teuwen R, Trapman J, Dijkema R, Brinkmann AO. 1995 Synergism between androgens and protein kinase-C on androgen regulated gene expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol 110:R1–R6.
  26. Gottlieb B. 1996 Androgen receptor gene mutations database, version 26–3-96. Montreal: Lady Davies Institute for Medical Research.
  27. He WW, Lindzey JK, Prescott JL, Kumar MV, Tindall DJ. 1994 The androgen receptor in the testicular feminized (Tfm) mouse may be a product of internal translation initiation. Receptor. 4:121–134.[Medline]
  28. Weinstein LS, Shenker A, Gejman PV, Merino MJ, Friedman E, Spiegel AM. 1991 Activating mutations of the stimulatory G protein in the McCune-Albright syndrome. N Engl J Med. 325:1688–1695.[Abstract]
  29. Shenker A, Weinstein LS, Sweet DE, Spiegel AM. 1994 An activating Gs{alpha} mutation is present in fibrous dysplasia of bone in the McCune Albright syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:750–755.[Abstract]
  30. Suzuki H, Sato N, Watabe Y, Masai M, Seino S, Shimazaki J. 1993 Androgen receptor gene mutations in human prostate cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 46:759–765.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Culig Z, Hobisch A, Cronauer MV, et al. 1993 Mutant androgen receptor detected in an advanced-stage prostatic carcinoma is activated by adrenal androgens and progesterone. Mol Endocrinol. 7:1541–1550.[Abstract]
  32. Schoenberg MP, Hakimi JM, Wang S, et al. 1994 Microsatellite mutation (CAG24->18) in the androgen receptor gene in human prostate cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 198:74–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Drews U. 1975 Direct and mediated effects of testosterone: the development of intersexes in sex reversed mosaic mice, heterozygous for testicular feminization. Anat Embryol. 146:325–340.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Cattanach BM, Pollard CE, Hawkes SG. 1971 Sex reversed mice: XX and X0 males. Cytogenetics. 10:319–337.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Werner, P.-M. Holterhus, G. Binder, H.-P. Schwarz, M. Morlot, D. Struve, C. Marschke, and O. Hiort
The A645D Mutation in the Hinge Region of the Human Androgen Receptor (AR) Gene Modulates AR Activity, Depending on the Context of the Polymorphic Glutamine and Glycine Repeats
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2006; 91(9): 3515 - 3520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. Kohler, S. Lumbroso, J. Leger, F. Audran, E. S. Grau, F. Kurtz, G. Pinto, M. Salerno, T. Semitcheva, P. Czernichow, et al.
Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: Somatic Mosaicism of the Androgen Receptor in Seven Families and Consequences for Sex Assignment and Genetic Counseling
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2005; 90(1): 106 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. F. S. Melo, B. B. Mendonca, A. E. C. Billerbeck, E. M. F. Costa, M. Inacio, F. A. Q. Silva, A. M. O. Leal, A. C. Latronico, and I. J. P. Arnhold
Clinical, Hormonal, Behavioral, and Genetic Characteristics of Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome in a Brazilian Cohort: Five Novel Mutations in the Androgen Receptor Gene
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2003; 88(7): 3241 - 3250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. N. Kalantaridou and G. P. Chrousos
Monogenic Disorders of Puberty
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2481 - 2494.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. L. M. Boehmer, H. Bruggenwirth, C. van Assendelft, B. J. Otten, M. C. T. Verleun-Mooijman, M. F. Niermeijer, H. G. Brunner, C. W. Rouwe, J. J. Waelkens, W. Oostdijk, et al.
Genotype Versus Phenotype in Families with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2001; 86(9): 4151 - 4160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. J.-C. Hellwinkel, P.-M. Holterhus, D. Struve, C. Marschke, N. Homburg, and O. Hiort
A Unique Exonic Splicing Mutation in the Human Androgen Receptor Gene Indicates a Physiologic Relevance of Regular Androgen Receptor Transcript Variants
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2569 - 2575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P.-M. Holterhus, G. H. G. Sinnecker, and O. Hiort
Phenotypic Diversity and Testosterone-Induced Normalization of Mutant L712F Androgen Receptor Function in a Kindred with Androgen Insensitivity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2000; 85(9): 3245 - 3250.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. Hiort, P.-M. Holterhus, T. Horter, W. Schulze, B. Kremke, M. Bals-Pratsch, G. H. G. Sinnecker, and K. Kruse
Significance of Mutations in the Androgen Receptor Gene in Males with Idiopathic Infertility
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2000; 85(8): 2810 - 2815.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. F. Ahmed, A. Cheng, L. Dovey, J. R. Hawkins, H. Martin, J. Rowland, N. Shimura, A. D. Tait, and I. A. Hughes
Phenotypic Features, Androgen Receptor Binding, and Mutational Analysis in 278 Clinical Cases Reported as Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2000; 85(2): 658 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holterhus, P.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinkmann, A. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holterhus, P.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinkmann, A. O.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals