| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Ito Hospital, 36 Jingumae, 4-Chome, Shibuya-Ku, 150 Tokyo, Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Naoko Momotani, M.D., Ito Hospital, 36 Jingumae, 4-Chome, Shibuya-Ku, 150 Tokyo, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We compared the effect of maternal ingestion of PTU with that of MMI on fetal thyroid status using cord sera at delivery in 77 mothers with Graves hyperthyroidism who were receiving thionamides and whose free T4 (FT4) levels were within the normal range. We also examined the dose effects on fetal thyroid status in these women. Thirty-four women were taking PTU (group P), and 43 were taking MMI (group M).
Neither the mean fetal FT4 nor the mean fetal TSH level was significantly different between the two groups. No significant difference in the occurrence of low FT4 levels or high fetal TSH levels was found between group P and group M (low FT4, 6% vs. 7%; high TSH, 21% vs. 14%). Little relationship was observed between maternal doses and fetal thyroid status; in fact, when low doses of both PTU (100 mg daily or less) and MMI (10 mg daily or less) were administered, high TSH levels in the fetus were observed in 7 of the 34 fetuses (21%) and in 6 of the 43 fetuses (14%), respectively. Higher doses were associated with normal or low fetal TSH levels.
These findings demonstrate that in terms of fetal hypothyroidism-inducing potential, there is little reason to choose PTU over MMI. Individualized, not uniformly low, doses of these drugs may prevent fetal hypothyroidism.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Based on the experimental study by Marchant et al. demonstrating the limited transplacental passage of [35S]PTU compared to [35S]MMI after a single oral dose given to normal women (2), the prevailing view has been that PTU is less likely than methimazole (MMI) to induce hypothyroidism in the fetus. They found a persistent fetal to maternal ratio of less than 1 after [35S]PTU administration (2). However, there has been little clinical evidence that the incidence of neonatal hypothyroidism is smaller in infants whose mothers received PTU compared with that in infants whose mothers received MMI. On the other hand, Gardner and his colleagues reported that cord serum PTU concentrations were consistently higher than maternal serum PTU concentrations during the treatment of hyperthyroidism (3).
It is generally believed that the higher the dose of thionamides, the higher the risk of fetal hypothyroidism; therefore, small doses (usually 150 mg PTU or less daily) have been recommended (4). However, some infants are born without hypothyroidism even though the mother receives large doses of thionamides, and as little as 50 mg PTU daily can cause high TSH levels in neonates (5, 6).
In this study, we compared the suppressive effect of maternal ingestion of PTU with that of MMI on fetal thyroid status by examining cord sera of euthyroid mothers with Graves hyperthyroidism during thionamide therapy. The dose effects on fetal thyroid status were also studied in these women.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each pair of serum samples was assayed for FT4, TSH, and antibodies that inhibit TSH binding (TBIAb). Normal ranges for maternal FT4, maternal TSH, cord FT4, and cord TSH levels based on data obtained from the normal group were 7.715.6 pmol/L, 0.33.5 µU/L, 10.419.9 pmol/L, and 1.821.1 mU/L, respectively. FT4 levels were measured with the Amerlex Free T4 RIA Kit (Amersham Medical, UK), and TSH levels were measured using the Boots-Celltech Sucrosep TSH immunoradiometric assay (Celltech Diagnostic, Slough, UK). TBIAb levels were measured by RRA using the TRAb Kit (Baxter, Tokyo, Japan), which was originally developed by Shewring and Smith (7).
Statistical significance was analyzed by Wilcoxon and
2
tests. Differences were considered significant at a level of
P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There was no significant difference in the mean fetal
FT4 level between group P and group M (13.8
± 2.6 vs. 14.2 ± 3.0 pmol/L; Fig. 1
). The incidence of fetal
FT4 levels below the normal range was 2 in 34
(6%) in group P and 3 in 43 (7%) in group M. The difference was not
significant. The mean FT4 level in either test
group was not significantly different from that in the healthy group
(15.2 ± 2.4 pmol/L; P < 0.05; Fig. 1
).
|
|
Relationship between drug doses and fetal thyroid status
Table 1
shows the relationship
between the daily maternal doses of PTU or MMI and fetal TSH levels. In
group P, mothers were receiving 25200 mg PTU daily. Thirty of the 34
mothers in group P were receiving 100 mg PTU or less daily. Seven of
the fetuses (23%) from these 30 mothers had TSH levels above the
normal range, and the other 23 fetuses (77%) had normal TSH levels. In
4 mothers who were taking more than 100 mg PTU daily, all he fetal TSH
levels were within the normal range. MMI doses in group M ranged from
2.520 mg daily. In 41 of the 43 mothers in this group, the doses were
10 mg or less. Six of the fetuses (15%) from these 41 mothers showed
high TSH levels, and the other 35 fetuses (85%) had normal TSH levels.
Four of the 6 fetuses with a high TSH level in group M were from
mothers taking 5 mg MMI or less daily. Both of the fetuses whose
mothers were taking 20 mg daily had a low TSH level.
|
Maternal FT4 concentrations ranged from 9.115.6 pmol/L in group P and from 7.715.6 pmol/L in group M. The mean maternal FT4 levels in groups P and M were 13.5 ± 1.6 and 12.5 ± 2.0 pmol/L, respectively; the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Maternal TSH values were below normal in 26 subjects in group P and 21 subjects in group M, within the normal range in 8 subjects in group P and 19 subjects in group M, and above the normal range in no subject in group P and in 3 subjects in group M. Mothers had low TSH levels significantly more often in group P than in group M.
Maternal TBIAb levels
Maternal mean TBIAb levels in groups P and M were not significantly different (17.6 ± 11.8% vs. 22.0 ± 10.8%).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
No difference was found between fetal thyroid status in PTU-treated women (group P) and that in MMI-treated women (group M) despite the fact that maternal thyroid status in the former group was not lower than that in the latter group. Therefore, it is evident that PTU is not less potent than MMI in inducing fetal hypothyroidism when treating Graves hyperthyroidism in pregnancy. This observation seems to contradict the finding of Marchant et al. that PTU showed smaller transference from the mother to the fetus and lower infant serum/maternal serum ratios than MMI when the drugs were administered in a single dose (2). It has been appreciated that the limited transplacental passage of PTU is due to its binding to serum protein about 80% of the time (9). MMI does not bind to protein in serum (10). A possible explanation for the similarity of the suppressive effect of PTU to that of MMI found in our study may be that in clinical use, the drugs are given by repeated administration (multiple doses). In this situation, the concentration in the fetus is likely to be close to or even higher than that in the mother [as reported by Gardner et al. (3)], provided that placental transfer is rapid compared with drug elimination and that back diffusion of the drug from fetus to mother is the predominant pathway of drug elimination from the fetus, as has been reported to be the case with other drugs. TBIAb levels in group P were similar to those in group M, indicating that differences in the activity of Graves hyperthyroidism are unlikely to affect the result.
There has been a report by Mortimer et al. that fetal thyroid status was inversely related to maternal drug dosage in 10 PTU-treated and 6 carbimazole-treated women with Graves disease, although they did not make their data available (11). In our patients with Graves disease, higher doses did not result in high TSH levels in the fetus, and lower doses were accompanied by high fetal TSH levels at a substantial frequency in both groups P and M (21% and 14%, respectively). Consistent with our observation, Gardner et al. and Cheron et al. did not find a significant correlation between PTU doses and fetal thyroid status (3, 12). A close correlation in both TSH receptor antibody activities and serum thionamide concentrations between the fetus and the mother in patients with Graves disease indicates that the fetal thyroid is under the influence of the same stimulatory and inhibitory factors as the maternal thyroid (3, 8). As a result, there is a significant correlation between fetal and maternal thyroid function (8). When maternal hyperthyroidism is due to autonomously functioning thyroid nodules, the dose relationship is likely to be seen, because the fetus does not suffer from hyperthyroidism in this case.
The significant correlation of fetal thyroid status with maternal thyroid status coupled with the fact that there are variations in doses necessary to maintain individual mothers in the same thyroid status suggests that a lack of relationship between maternal doses and fetal thyroid status is reasonable. Of course, in some cases, noncompliance may be another reason for the lack of correlation between dose of thionamides and maternal/fetal thyroid function. Doses higher than those in our study would not cause fetal hypothyroidism as long as maternal FT4 levels are in a high normal range or above (8).
The reason why the thyroid status of some fetuses was suppressed, though mildly, whereas that of others was not remains unclear. Refetoff et al. reported the occurrence of hypothyroidism in only one infant in each of two sets of dizygotic twins born to mothers treated with thionamides during gestation (13). This may be another example of the individual variability. Differences, if any, in transplacental passage of both drugs and TSH receptor antibodies among the patients may not be the only factor responsible for the individual variation, as there is a good correlation in both of these factors between the fetus and the mother (3, 8). The cause may be multifactorial. Subtle individual variability in serum concentrations, in transplacental passage of both drugs and antibodies, and in susceptibility to drugs or antibodies may produce significant differences.
Recent studies on neuropsychological outcomes in early treated congenital hypothyroidism have shown that intellectual retardation, if it ever occurs, can be caused only by severe hypothyroidism (14, 15). Therefore, transient mild hypothyroidism due to maternal thionamide therapy is unlikely to affect normal brain development. In fact, previous studies on the intellectual development of children exposed to thionamide therapy have shown no discernible retardation (16, 19). However, it may be best to keep the fetus in a euthyroid state because any subtle developmental defects may have been missed in these studies. Currently, maternal thyroid status, but not thionamide dose, may be the most convenient and reliable marker in avoiding fetal hypothyroidism (8). It is advisable to keep maternal FT4 in a high normal to slightly hyperthyroid range at least near term as thyroid hormones become increasingly important for normal brain development.
There has been another reason for some clinicians to choose PTU. Aplasia cutis, a localized defect of the skin on the vertex of the scalp, the prognosis of which is benign, has been associated with MMI administration in a small number of cases (20, 21). However, statistical investigation refutes the causal relationship of maternal ingestion of MMI with aplasia cutis in the fetus (22, 23).
MMI is commonly chosen for routine management of thyrotoxic patients because of its more rapid and reliable efficacy and possible lower incidences of major side effects (24, 25, 26), although Wing and her colleagues did not find a significant difference in the time needed to normalize FT4 indexes in pregnant patients (27).
We conclude that when maternal FT4 levels are used as an index of fetal thyroid function, PTU and MMI are comparable in the treatment of hyperthyroidism due to Graves disease, at least in terms of the fetal thyroid.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 22, 1996.
Revised February 11, 1997.
Revised April 15, 1997.
Accepted July 16, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Laurberg, C. Bournaud, J. Karmisholt, and J. Orgiazzi Management of Graves' hyperthyroidism in pregnancy: focus on both maternal and foetal thyroid function, and caution against surgical thyroidectomy in pregnancy Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2009; 160(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Girling Thyroid disease in pregnancy Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), October 1, 2008; 10(4): 237 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Subsection Reports J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8_suppl): s8 - s47. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Abalovich, N. Amino, L. A. Barbour, R. H. Cobin, L. J. De Groot, D. Glinoer, S. J. Mandel, and A. Stagnaro-Green Management of Thyroid Dysfunction during Pregnancy and Postpartum: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8_suppl): s1 - s47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M Chattaway and T. B Klepser Propylthiouracil Versus Methimazole in Treatment of Graves' Disease During Pregnancy Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2007; 41(6): 1018 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. N Pearce Diagnosis and management of thyrotoxicosis. BMJ, June 10, 2006; 332(7554): 1369 - 1373. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Luton, I. Le Gac, E. Vuillard, M. Castanet, J. Guibourdenche, M. Noel, M.-E. Toubert, J. Leger, C. Boissinot, M.-H. Schlageter, et al. Management of Graves' Disease during Pregnancy: The Key Role of Fetal Thyroid Gland Monitoring J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 6093 - 6098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Cooper Antithyroid Drugs N. Engl. J. Med., March 3, 2005; 352(9): 905 - 917. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Waltman, J. M. Brewer, and S. Lobert Thyroid Storm During Pregnancy: A Medical Emergency Crit. Care Nurse, April 1, 2004; 24(2): 74 - 79. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. E. Kempers, D. A. van Tijn, A. S. P. van Trotsenburg, J. J. M. de Vijlder, B. M. Wiedijk, and T. Vulsma Central Congenital Hypothyroidism due to Gestational Hyperthyroidism: Detection Where Prevention Failed J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5851 - 5857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Singh, C. A. Parvin, and A. M. Gronowski Establishment of Reference Intervals for Markers of Fetal Thyroid Status in Amniotic Fluid J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2003; 88(9): 4175 - 4179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Polifka and J.M. Friedman Medical genetics: 1. Clinical teratology in the age of genomics Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 1, 2002; 167(3): 265 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Mandel and D. S. Cooper The Use of Antithyroid Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2354 - 2359. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Weetman Graves' Disease N. Engl. J. Med., October 26, 2000; 343(17): 1236 - 1248. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Buckingham The Hyperthyroid Fetus and Infant NeoReviews, June 1, 2000; 1(6): e103 - 109. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |