help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khosravi, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Khare, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khosravi, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Khare, A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 12 3944-3951
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Acid-Labile Subunit of Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein Complex: Measurement, Molecular, and Clinical Evaluation

M. Javad Khosravi, Anastasia Diamandi, Jehangir Mistry, Radha G. Krishna and Aruna Khare

Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (Canada), Inc. (M.J.K., A.D.), and the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Toronto (M.J.K.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. (J.M., R.G.K., A.K.), Webster, Texas 77598

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: M. J. Khosravi, Ph.D., Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (Canada), Inc., Mount Sinai Hospital, Room 653, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although the acid-labile subunit (ALS) of the ~150-kDa insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein (IGFBP) complex was described over a decade ago, details of ALS physiology have remained largely uncertain. We evaluated antibodies to synthetic human ALS and constructed a noncompetitive ALS enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Whereas uncomplexed ALS is directly measured, determination of total levels required sample pretreatment with SDS, which was found to optimally dissociate complexed ALS and significantly enhance ALS immunoreactivity. ALS in random adult sera was approximately 50% uncomplexed, and samples devoid of complexed ALS by immunoaffinity separation contained about 54% of the total levels. Serum ALS fractionated by gel filtration high performance liquid chromatography eluted in a single peak at approximately 150 kDa with IGF-I and IGFBP-3, but appeared at about 400–500 kDa after sample acidification and fractionation under acidic condition. The unexpected shift in ALS immunoreactivity remained unchanged when acid-neutralized or SDS-treated samples were fractionated under neutral pH and was reproducible when the 150-kDa complex was isolated, treated with acid or SDS, and rechromatographed. ALS in adult sera more tightly correlated with IGFBP-3 than IGF-I or IGF-II. The total levels (mean ± SD) were 16.7 ± 3.7 mg/L in 22 normal subjects, 28.3 ± 8.1 mg/L in 20 acromegalic patients, and 9.5 ± 3.8 in 32 GH-deficient adults. Little or no ALS was detectable in amniotic fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, seminal plasma, or milk, whereas high levels were present in synovial fluid. The development of ALS enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay should greatly facilitate further investigations of this unique glycoprotein.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
INSULIN-LIKE growth factor I and II (IGF-I and IGF-II) are polypeptide hormones that play important roles in cellular growth and metabolism (1, 2, 3). IGFs are produced in multiple normal and malignant tissues and are present in blood and other physiological fluids in close association with a family of high affinity IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) that appear to regulate their bioactivities. Six structurally homologous IGFBPs with distinct tissue expression, regulation, and functions have been characterized and sequenced (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). IGFBP-7, a low affinity IGFBP, has been recently described (10).

In human circulation, IGFs are mostly confined to an approximately 150-kDa GH-dependent ternary protein complex consisting of IGFBP-3, a molecule of IGF-I or IGF-II, and a unique acid-labile subunit (ALS) (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). ALS was first described by the observation that acidification would result in dissociation of the 150-kDa complex into acid-stable IGF (~7.5 kDa) and IGFBP-3 (~50 kDa) components, whereas neutralization of the acidified sample would no longer support formation of the complex (11, 12). The existence of ALS was later confirmed by demonstrating that serum-derived ALS could readily convert binary IGF/IGFBP-3 complexes to the 150-kDa form and that IGFBP-3 occupancy by IGF-I or IGF-II was a prerequisite for the complex assembly (13, 14). The ALS-dependent increase in the molecular size of the binary complexes appears to be an important regulator of IGF and/or IGFBP-3 access to extravascular compartments. However, ALS is reportedly capable of IGF-independent interaction with IGFBP-3 and may have the ability to increase the binding capacity of IGFBP-3 for the IGF peptide (15).

Previous reports have shown that ALS is a glycoprotein that contains 578 amino acid residues and has a molecular mass of 63.3 kDa. It is produced by the liver, and the native molecule appears in serum as a 84/86-kDa glycoprotein doublet (13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19). The midregion of ALS is largely composed of 18–20 leucine-rich repeats of 24 amino acids. These repeat sequences are also common in a wide variety of proteins that, like ALS, are involved in protein-protein interaction (18). Unique ALS-specific sequences are expressed in the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of the molecule (13, 18).

Despite significant progress in biochemical characterization of ALS (13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19), details of ALS physiology and its potential diagnostic and clinical relevance have remained uncertain. This has been largely due to the unavailability of simple and reliable ALS methods. As ALS circulates in both complexed and uncomplexed (free) forms, methods capable of independent analysis of its subfractions may facilitate investigations in both research and clinical laboratories. Although free ALS levels may be intimately involved in the regulation of ALS physiology, determination of its total levels, including the IGFBP-3-bound ALS subfraction, may prove to be a better diagnostic indicator. Finally, the ability to quantify changes in the ratio of ALS subfractions may allow a more precise definition of physiological ALS and a better determination of its potential diagnostic value.

We here report the development of highly specific and rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for direct measurement of free and total ALS levels. The assays incorporates site-specific antibodies raised against unique N- and C-terminal sequences of human ALS. The availability of these assays was instrumental in the development of novel procedures for dissociation of ALS from the 150-kDa ternary complex, further molecular characterization of ALS by gel filtration chromatography, and direct comparison of free and total ALS levels. Preliminary evaluation of ALS in various biological fluids and direct comparison of serum ALS with IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 in normal subjects and in patients with GH deficiency or acromegaly are also presented.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Samples and materials

Adult serum samples from patients with GH deficiency (17 women, aged 21–60 yr; 15 men, aged 21–60 yr), patients with acromegaly (10 women, aged 29–75 yr; 10 men, aged 35–66 yr), and normal subjects (4 women, aged 54–66 yr; 4 men, aged 49–66 yr) were provided by Dr. C. Camacho-Hubner (St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK). Additional serum samples from normal adults (7 women, aged 23–38 yr; 7 men, aged 32–39 yr) were obtained from Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (Webster, TX). Randomly selected serum samples, synovial fluids (SF), and cerebrospinal fluids (CSF) were obtained from the clinical laboratories at Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto, Canada). The samples were residuals from routine clinical test samples and were from an adult population. Upon collection, blood samples were allowed to clot, then were separated; after clinical testing, the residuals were used for these studies within 48 h after collection. SF and CSF were visually clear of potential blood contamination and were stored at -20 C for less than 4 weeks until use. Amniotic fluid from pregnancies at 14–17 weeks gestation and seminal plasma were provided by Dr. E. P. Diamandis (Mount Sinai Hospital). Human milk was obtained from consenting donors.

Recombinant human IGF-I and IGF-II were obtained from GroPep (Adelaide, Australia), and recombinant nonglycosylated IGFBP-3 was obtained from Celtrix Pharmaceutical (Santa Clara, CA). Recombinant human IGFBP-2, IGFBP-4, IGFBP-5, and IGFBP-6 were purchased from Austral Biologicals (San Roman, CA). IGFBP-1, purified from human amniotic fluid and calibrated against pure recombinant human IGFBP-1, was obtained from Diagnostic Systems Laboratories. Other materials and chemicals were obtained as previously described (20, 21).

Purified human ALS was obtained from Diagnostic Systems Laboratories. The purification procedure was similar to a previously reported method (14), except that human plasma was first precipitated with 15–45% ammonium sulfate, and after dialyzing the precipitate against 0.05 mol/L NaPO4, pH 7.2, the solution was chromatographed on an anti-IGFBP-3 affinity column as described below. The ALS component of the complex eluted in 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, containing 0.6 mol/L NaCl and ALS positive fractions further purified by ion exchange chromatography on a Fast Flow Q-Sepharose column (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) using a linear 0.2–0.5 mol/L NaCl salt gradient. The physical purity was established by SDS-PAGE, followed by Coomassie blue staining and densitometric comparison of the stained band with different concentrations of BSA, which was similarly treated and subjected to SDS-PAGE. The preparation showed a major doublet corresponding to ALS and several minor bands. As judged by gel densitometry, the preparation appeared as ~70% ALS. The purified preparation, stored frozen at -20 C in 0.5 mL aliquots, was initially used for ALS standard and control calibration. The stock standards and controls were subsequently calibrated against a reference preparation of human serum-derived ALS provided by Dr. R. C. Baxter (New South Wales, Australia). The immunoreactivity of the new preparation was lower by ~4.8-fold relative to that of the preparation developed by D. R. Baxter. Both preparations showed closely parallel responses to serial dilution (data not shown).

Goat antisera to N- and C-terminal regions of ALS were obtained from Diagnostic Systems Laboratories. The antisera were raised against synthetic human ALS peptides ALS-(1–34) and ALS-(551–578), and purified by affinity chromatography. The antibodies specifically detected an ALS doublet of approximately 84 kDa in serum by Western immunoblot analysis (data not shown). Development and characterization of a similar antiserum raised in rabbits to ALS-(1–34) have been recently reported (22).

Total and free ALS ELISA

The principal difference between the two methods is inclusion of SDS in the total ALS ELISA. Both methods incorporate identical components, except for the following. The total ALS ELISA sample pretreatment buffer was 0.05 mol/L sodium borate (pH 8.5), 9 g/L NaCl, 10 g/L BSA, 50 mL/L normal goat serum, 25 mL/L normal mouse serum, 0.5 mL/L Tween-20, 1.0 g/L SDS, and 0.1 g/L thimerosal; the standard matrix buffer and the assay buffer were the same as described above, except that the latter contained 0.25 g SDS/L. The free ALS ELISA assay buffer was 0.05 mol/L Tris-maleate (pH 7.0), 9 g/L NaCl, 20 g/L BSA, 0.5 g/L bovine globulin, 25 mL/L normal goat serum, 25 mL/L normal mouse serum, 0.5 mL Tween-20, and 0.1 g/L thimerosal; the standard matrix buffer was 0.05 mol/L Tris-maleate (pH 7.0), 0.9 g/L NaCl, 60 g/L BSA, 0.05% Tween-20, and 0.1 g/L thimerosal. Other buffers were previously described (20, 21).

Antibody coating to microtiter wells was performed at a concentration of 2.5–30 mg/L using previously described methods (20). Conjugation of antibody to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was performed as recently described (21). Standards were prepared by diluting calibrated stock ALS in the appropriate standard matrix buffers to give ALS standards of approximately 0.0075, 0.030, 0.120, 0.240, and 0.480 mg/L (0.75–48.5 mg/L after correction for the sample pretreatment dilution factor of 101-fold), or about 1.09, 4.38, 17.5, 35, and 70 mg/L for the total and free ALS ELISAs, respectively. The total ALS standards are lower because ALS immunoreactivity was enhanced by more than 200-fold after sample pretreatment, and all samples required at least 100-fold dilution to bring them within the measuring range of the assay. Standards were stable for up to 4 days at 4 C and for more than 4 months at -20 C or lower. The quality control samples used in the free ALS ELISA were fresh serum samples, whereas evaluation of the total ALS ELISA involved SDS-treated control sera.

The total ALS ELISA was performed according to previously described procedures (23, 24). Standards or treated samples (0.02 mL after 101-fold dilution, as described bellow) were added in duplicate to precoated wells, followed by addition of the total ALS assay buffer (0.1 mL) and 1-h room temperature incubation with continuous shaking. The wells were washed four times and incubated with 0.1 mL/well of the anti-ALS antibody-HRP conjugate (diluted in the assay buffer to approximately 0.1–0.25 mg/L) for 30 min as described above. The wells were washed, 0.1 mL TMB/H2O2 substrate solution was added, and color development during a 10-min incubation was quantified by dual wavelength measurement at 450 nm with background wavelength correction set at 620 nm. In the free ALS ELISA, standards or untreated serum samples (0.05 mL) were added in duplicate to the precoated wells, followed by addition of the free ALS assay buffer (0.05 mL) and completion of the assay as described above.

ALS ELISA validation procedures

For validation of total and free ALS ELISAs, SDS-treated or untreated serum samples were used, respectively. In both assays, the lower limit of detection (sensitivity) was determined by interpolating the mean plus 2SD of 12 replicate measurements of the zero standard. The intraassay coefficients of variation (CVs) were determined by replicate analysis (n = 12) of 3 samples at ALS levels of 0.048–0.29 mg/L (in total ALS ELISA, 4.8–29.2 mg/L after correction for the dilution factor) and 2.29–12.8 mg/L (in free ALS ELISA) in 1 run; interassay CVs were determined by duplicate measurement of appropriate samples in 8–12 separate runs. The free ALS ELISA recovery was assessed by adding 50 µL ALS in acid-neutralized samples (final treatment dilution, 10-fold) to 450 µL freshly drawn, undiluted serum, followed by analysis. The recovery of the total ALS ELISA was similarly evaluated by adding 50 µL ALS in SDS-treated samples (final treatment dilution, 10-fold) to 450-µL serum samples that had been treated with SDS at the recommended 101-fold dilution as described below. Recovery was determined by comparison of added ALS to the amount measured after subtracting the endogenous levels. Linearity was tested by analyzing serum samples serially diluted (2- to 16-fold) in the corresponding zero standard buffer.

Other assays

IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 were analyzed by immunoassay kits manufactured and marketed by Diagnostic Systems Laboratories. These assays are based on noncompetitive ELISA involving a solid phase capture antibody and a soluble HRP-labeled detection antibody. The performance characteristics of theses assays have been recently described (23, 25, 26). Optical density measurements for all ELISAs were performed with the Labsystems Multiskan Multisoft microplate reader (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland).

Sample pretreatment procedures for measuring total ALS

Acid-neutralization treatment. Acid treatment of sample followed by neutralization (acid-neutralization) was performed by a modification of a previously described method (23). The basic procedure involves the addition of 0.01 mL serum to 0.5 mL acidification buffer (0.2 mol/L glycine-HCl, pH 2.0) in a 5-mL glass tube, incubation at room temperature for 30 min, and subsequent addition of 0.5 mL neutralization solution (0.85 mol/L Tris base containing 0.05% SDS). The final sample dilution factor is 101-fold.

SDS treatment. The alternative procedure is based on sample treatment with an optimized concentration of SDS dissolved in the total ALS sample pretreatment buffer. The optimized procedure involves addition of 0.01 mL serum to 1.0 mL sample pretreatment buffer and incubation at room temperature for 30 min. The final sample dilution factor is 101-fold.

Molecular sieve chromatography

To study distribution of ALS immunoreactivity, aliquots of fresh serum samples (0.2–0.5 mL) were subjected to size-exclusion chromatography on a precalibrated 600 x 7.5-mm TSK-Gel G-3000 SW high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column (Tosohaas, Montgomeryville, PA) as previously described (21). The column was preequilibrated and eluted with 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.2) and 9.0 g/L NaCl at 0.5 mL/min, with collection of 0.5-mL fractions. Gel filtration molecular mass markers (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA) included thyroglobulin (60 kDa), {gamma}-globulin (158 kDa), ovalbumin (44 kDa), myoglobin (17 kDa), and vitamin B12 (1.4 kDa). The ALS immunoreactivity of the fractionated serum was evaluated by the free ALS ELISA. IGFBP-3 immunoreactivity was measured with IGFBP-3 ELISA. In the same fractions, total ALS immunoreactivity was measured after aliquot of each fraction was acid-neutralized [i.e. 1:4 (vol/vol) 0.2 mol/L glycine, pH 2.0, 30 min; then neutralized with 1:1 (vol/vol) 0.85 mol/L Tris base; final dilution factor, 8]. Where indicated, IGF-I in the acid-neutralized samples was measured using IGF-I ELISA.

To determine the potential effect of various treatments on molecular distribution of ALS immunoreactivity, aliquots of pretreated serum samples (0.2 or 0.5 mL) were fractionated on size-exclusion HPLC as described. Acid-neutralization was performed using similar treatment ratios as those described above, with an 8-fold final sample dilution. SDS treatment was performed by mixing samples with the total ALS sample pretreatment buffer [1:8 (vol/vol), 30 min; final dilution factor, 8]. Where indicated, detergents such as Tween-20, Triton X-100 (1.0 or 2.5 mL/L), or SDS (1.0 mL/L) were also added to the neutralization buffer. Fractions were analyzed for total ALS, IGFBP-3, and IGF-I.

Acid-gel filtration chromatography

Size-exclusion chromatography of acidified serum samples was performed using a Bio-Sil SEC-250 HPLC column (600 x 7.5, Bio-Rad) as described (23). Briefly, the column was preequilibrated and eluted with 1.0 mol/L acetic acid containing 0.1 mol/L NaCl. Sample (0.1 mL) was preincubated with 0.4 mL 1.25 mol/L acetic acid containing 0.125 mol/L NaCl at room temperature for 15 min. The column was loaded with 0.2 mL of the acidified sample and eluted at 0.8 mL/min. Each fraction was immediately neutralized with 0.8 mL 1.25 mol/L Tris base as described. Fractions were then assayed for total ALS, IGFBP-3, IGF-I, and IGF-II.

Affinity chromatography on anti-IGFBP-3 column

A polyclonal anti-IGFBP-3 antibody (5 mg; Diagnostic Systems Laboratories) was coupled to approximately 3 g cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose-4B (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and packed into a minicolumn (~0.6 x 3-cm packed bed volume; ~2-mL void volume). More than 90% of the antibody was coupled, as determined by absorbance monitoring at 280 nm. Fresh serum samples (1.0–2 mL; n = 7) gently layered onto the column at 4 C and effluent fractions containing free ALS were collected at approximately 0.05 mL/min and assayed for ALS, IGFBP-3, and absorbance at 280 nm. In all applications, IGFBP-3 analysis, used to monitor column efficiency in removing the 150-kDa complex, showed little or no detectable IGFBP-3 in the effluent fractions, and absorbance at 280 was generally less than 0.05 after washing the column with 4 column vol buffer (0.05 mol/L NaPO4, pH 6.5); washing was generally performed with 6–8 column vol. The column was regenerated by sequential washing with 4–6 column vol 0.2 mol/L glycine-HCl, pH 2.0, and 6–8 column vol phosphate buffer before use or storage at 4 C.

Data analysis

ELISA data were analyzed using data reduction packages included in the Labsystems microplate reader with cubic spline (smoothed) curve fit. Other statistical analyses were performed using the Statworks statistical software package (Starlight Network, Mountain View, CA) on an Apple Macintosh SE computer. Descriptive data are presented as the mean and SD unless otherwise specified. Linear regression analysis was performed by the least squares method, and correlation coefficients were determined by the Pearson method.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ALS ELISA

An ELISA was developed using a two-step (sequential) noncompetitive immunoreaction format in which the anti-ALS-(1–34) and ALS-(551–578) antibodies were used for detection and coating, respectively. The optimized protocols were established by evaluating effects of various technical manipulations on the analytical performance of the assay, particularly the detection limit, dynamic range, precision and delayed sample addition (21, 23). The addition of IGF-I (up to 300 µg/L); IGF-II (up to 3000 µg/L); IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-4–6 (up to 500 µg/L); and IGFBP-3 (up to 4.2 mg/L) to the zero standard or a standard preparation of approximately 0.14 mg/L ALS did not show any cross-reactivity or interferences. The total and free ALS ELISA validation data are summarized in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. ALS ELISA validation data

 
Sample pretreatment procedures

As an alternative to acid-neutralization, the effects of variations in pH, ionic strength, and detergents on ALS immunoreactivity were examined. As shown in Table 2Go, serum ALS remained relatively constant when analyzed untreated or after 2-fold dilutions in various buffers, pH 6.5–9.5. Increases of up to about 3-fold in ALS levels were observed for samples diluted 10-fold in alkaline buffers (pH >=8.5) in the absence or presence of a relatively high salt concentration (1.0 mol/L). The addition of SDS was highly effective in enhancing ALS immunoreactivity. ALS immunoreactivity increased by more than 200-fold after sample predilution in buffers containing 1 g/L SDS (Table 2Go). The SDS effect was concentration dependent and appeared most effective at alkaline pH, reaching a plateau within about 30 min of incubation (data not shown). Compared with acid-neutralization, the enhancing effect of SDS on ALS immunoreactivity was highly independent of the dilution ratios introduced by the sample pretreatment method. The mean ALS responses (absorbance ± SD) obtained for a 40-fold diluted serum sample after the initial 1:10, 1:20, or 1:40 sample pretreatment dilution ratios were 1.17 ± 0.08, 1.30 ± 0.05, and 1.92 ± 0.04 U for the acid-neutralized samples and 1.90 ± 0.05, 1.95 ± 0.09, and 1.95 ± 0.08 U for the SDS-treated samples, respectively. However, under optimal conditions, described in Materials and Methods, total ALS immunoreactivity measured in acid-neutralized (y) and SDS-treated (x) samples showed excellent correlation: y = -0.82 + 0.91x (r = 0.97), Sy,x = 0.035 (P < 0.001; n = 42).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of assay variables on ALS immunoreactivity

 
Comparison of total and free ALS in serum

Randomly selected serum samples from an adult population (n = 41) were assayed. Regression analysis showed a high correlation between total and free ALS levels and indicated that uncomplexed ALS may, on the average, constitute approximately 50% of the total levels (Fig. 1Go); the total and free ALS levels (mean ± SD) were 13.0 ± 4.4 and 6.7 ± 4.0 mg/L, respectively. For confirmation, ALS was measured in selected serum samples (n = 7) before and after removal of the 150-kDa complex by anti-IGFBP-3 immunoaffinity chromatography. As shown in Table 3Go, the effluent fractions contained less than 0.5% of the immunoreactive IGFBP-3, but about 54% of the total ALS immunoreactivity; the total and free ALS levels measured in this manner were 19.7 ± 4.9 and 10.7 ± 2.5 mg/L, respectively. The finding of comparable free ALS levels in the whole sera (12.0 ± 2.2 mg/L) and their corresponding effluent fractions (13.6 ± 2.9) is consistent with the inaccessibility of complexed ALS for measurement by the free ALS ELISA. The apparent increase in free ALS in the effluent fractions by approximately 14% is most likely due to increased ALS immunoreactivity (accessibility) in response to dilution as described (Table 2Go).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Comparison of total and free ALS ELISA. Correlation of total and free ALS concentrations in randomly selected sera from adults are shown (y = 0.5 + 0.47x; r = 0.52; Sy,x = 0.124; P < 0.001). Values represent the mean of duplicate measurements.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Total and free ALS after immunoaffinity removal of the 150-kDa complex

 
Molecular forms of immunoreactive ALS

To evaluate the molecular profile of immunoreactivity detected, fresh serum samples (n = 5) were fractionated by size-exclusion HPLC. As represented in Fig. 2Go, IGFBP-3 eluted in a single sharp peak at about 150 kDa, whereas ALS immunoreactivity was completely undetectable. The latter is primarily due to the inaccessibility of the complexed form of ALS for antibody binding as well as the considerably lower immunoreactivity of uncomplexed ALS (Table 2Go). When an aliquot of each fraction was acid-neutralized and reassayed, a single peak of ALS immunoreactivity appeared within that of the IGFBP-3 profile, indicating nearly identical gel filtration migration for both complexed and uncomplexed ALS. The IGF-I component of the ternary complex peaked in the same fractions.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. HPLC profile of immunoreactive ALS. A fresh serum sample was fractionated on a TSK-Gel-G3000 SW HPLC column. Factions were directly assayed for IGFBP-3 ({square}) and ALS ({blacktriangleup}). IGF-I ({circ}) and ALS ({blacksquare}) in an acid-neutralized aliquot of each fraction were also measured. The column was calibrated with gel filtration molecular mass standards eluting at fractions 23.5 (660 kDa), 31.9 (158 kDa), 37.2 (44 kDa), 44.3 (17 kDa), and 52.6 (1.4 kDa). Values for IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were divided by 50 to bring them within the graph scale.

 
To further demonstrate the ALS specificity of the assay, acidified serum samples were fractionated by size-exclusion acid-HPLC, and fractions were analyzed for IGFBP-3, IGF-I, IGF-II, and ALS. Predictably, IGF-I and IGF-II peaked at the expected molecular mass of less than 10 kDa, completely removed from the 40- to 45-kDa IGFBP-3 peak. However, ALS immunoreactivity peaked at a considerably higher molecular mass of about 400–500 kDa (Fig. 3Go). The unexpected shift in the ALS filtration profile did not change when acidified samples were neutralized, incubated for 2 h at room temperature, and fractionated under neutral conditions (Fig. 4Go). Addition of detergents such as Tween-20 (1 mL/L), Triton X-100 (1 mL/L), or SDS (1 g/L) to the neutralization buffer had no effect on the ALS filtration profile (data not shown). ALS behaved in the manner described above when SDS-treated samples were fractionated. In both SDS-treated and acid-neutralized samples, IGFBP-3 peaks appeared at about 40 kDa (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Acid-HPLC profile of immunoreactive ALS, IGFBP-3, IGF-I, and IGF-II. Acidified serum sample was fractionated on a Bio-Sil Sec-250 HPLC column under acidic conditions. Neutralized fractions were assayed for total ALS ({blacksquare}), IGFBP-3 ({square}), IGF-I ({circ}), and IGF-II (•). The column was calibrated with molecular mass standards eluting at fractions 12 (660 kDa), 17 (158 kDa), 21 (44 kDa), 26 (17 kDa), and 30 (1.4 kDa). Values for IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 were divided by 50 to bring them within the graph scale.

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. HPLC profile of acid-neutralized or SDS-treated ALS. A fresh serum sample was acid-neutralized ({circ} and •) or SDS-treated ({blacksquare} and {square}) and fractionated on a TSK-Gel-G3000 SW HPLC column. Fractions were assayed for total ALS ({blacksquare} and {circ}) and IGFBP-3 ({square} and •). The column was calibrated with molecular mass standards, eluting at fractions 23.5 (660 kDa), 31.9 (158 kDa), 37.2 (44 kDa), 44.3 (17 kDa), and 52.6 (1.4 kDa). The arrow marks the elution peak of the 150-kDa complex identified in fractionated serum as in Fig. 2Go. Values for IGFBP-3 were divided by 50 to bring them within the graph scale.

 
The gel filtration profile of ALS was independent of the presence of other serum proteins that could potentially form complexes with the treated ALS molecules and significantly alter its filtration behavior. When 150-kDa peak fractions from Fig. 2Go (fraction 31–36; pooled and concentrated ~7-fold) were acid-neutralized or SDS-treated and then refractionated by HPLC, ALS and IGFBP-3 components of the complex peaked at the same positions as those shown in Fig. 4Go for the treated whole serum. ALS and IGFBP-3 eluted at about 400–500 and 40 kDa, respectively (data not shown).

Relationship of ALS with IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3

Randomly selected serum samples (n = 38) were assayed for total ALS, IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3. Regression analysis of data showed a high degree of correlation between ALS and IGFBP-3 (Fig. 5Go). Significant correlations were also obtained between ALS and IGF-I or IGF-II levels (Fig. 6Go). Interrun comparison of ALS values was excellent (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Relationship between total ALS and IGFBP-3. In A, correlation of total ALS and IGFBP-3 levels in randomly selected adult serum samples is shown (y = -1.16 + 3.26x; r = 0.93; Sy,x = 0.22; P < 0.001). In B, an interassay comparison of the total ALS values assayed on two-different occasions is shown (y = -0.30 + 1.05x; r = 0.98; Sy,x = 0.035; P < 0.001). Values represent the mean of duplicate measurements.

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Relationship among total ALS, IGF-I, and IGF-II. Correlation of total ALS with IGF-I (A; y = 3.1 + 0.038x; r = 0.76; Sy = 0.006; P < 0.001) and IGF-II (B; y = 0.63 + 0.013x; r = 0.82; Sy,x = 0.002; P < 0.001) in randomly selected adult serum samples are shown. Values represent the mean of duplicate measurements.

 
Relatively little or no ALS was present in amniotic fluid (n = 10), CSF (n = 12), seminal plasma (n = 10), and milk (n = 3). The total ALS levels (mean ± SD) in these samples were 0.25 ± 0.15, 0.023 ± 0.02, 0.016 ± 0.008, and 0.045 ± 0.045 mg/L, respectively. In contrast, SF (n = 3) contained 7.9 ± 4.0 mg/L ALS.

Clinical assessment

Serum samples from adults with GH deficiency (n = 32), patients with acromegaly (n = 20), and age-matched normal subjects (n = 22) were simultaneously analyzed for IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and total or free ALS. As shown in Fig. 7Go, the total ALS immunoreactivity patterns obtained for the various sample groups were similar to those detected for IGF-I and IGFBP-3. Compared to those in the normal subjects (16.7 ± 3.7 mg/L), the total levels were generally higher in acromegaly (28.3 ± 8.1 mg/L) and lower in GH deficiency (9.5 ± 3.8 mg/L). A similar picture emerged when samples were assayed for free ALS (Fig. 7Go), although there appeared to be relatively more overlaps among the three sample groups. The mean ± SD for acromegalic, normal, and GH-deficient subjects were 10.6 ± 3.6, 6.9 ± 2.1, and 3.6 ± 2.0 mg/L, respectively.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Total ALS, free ALS, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 immunoreactivity profile. Serum samples from adults with acromegaly (n = 20), patients with GH deficiency (n = 32), and age-matched normal controls (n = 22) were assayed. Values represent the mean of duplicates. Horizontal lines show the mean of the measurements.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The importance of precise and accurate determination of ALS is linked to its apparent physiological relevance and potential diagnostic applications. The production of ALS is reportedly GH dependent (17), and it appears to play a significant role in a complex system that regulates the bioavailability and actions of the IGF peptide (14, 15).

Although the existence of ALS has been known for over a decade (11, 12), methods for direct quantification of ALS have not been fully explored. Approaches to ALS immunoassay may have been complicated by antibody cross-reactivity due to ALS midregion homology with other serum proteins (18) or by poor detectability of ALS in its native conformations, as demonstrated in the present report. The fact that circulating ALS is expressed in both complexed and uncomplexed forms with inherently different degrees of immunoreactivity may have further complicated ALS analysis. Previous reports have shown that active ALS molecules could be quantified by its ability to bind and convert binary IGFBP-3/IGF complexes to the 150-kDa complex or by RIA before or after chromatographic removal of the ternary complex (13, 14, 16, 17). Although differential antibody recognition of the complexed vs. uncomplexed ALS has not been investigated, chromatographic separation of the two forms of ALS appears mandatory for determination of their relative concentrations by RIA (17). The present alternative approach is based on sample pretreatment with procedures that would result in unfolding of both complexed and uncomplexed ALS, thus allowing direct measurement of its total levels. Because the assay does not recognize the complexed form of ALS, direct determination of uncomplexed ALS by the free ALS ELISA is also possible.

We here demonstrated that the immunoreactivity of serum ALS is enhanced more than 200-fold in response to SDS treatment. This suggests exposure of epitopes that are not readily accessible to antibody binding, particularly when ALS is associated with the ternary complex. This observation may have important bearings on ALS determinations in untreated serum samples, as measured concentrations may be influenced by changes in the three-dimensional presentation and, thus, immunoreactivity of ALS. The significant scattering of values observed in comparison of free and total ALS may be primarily due to variable immunoreactivity of uncomplexed ALS rather than true variations in its absolute levels. Accordingly, procedures for ALS determination should include a sample pretreatment method that would confer consistent immunoreactivity to both uncomplexed as well as complexed ALS, unless equivalent and consistent immunoreactivity of the two forms could be demonstrated.

The novel SDS-based sample pretreatment method appeared highly efficient in enhancing ALS immunoreactivity, and its effect was relatively independent of variations in the initial sample pretreatment dilution ratios. Direct determinations of ALS by the total and free ALS ELISAs indicated that, on the average, approximately 50% of serum ALS is uncomplexed. This was further supported by the finding that serum samples devoid of the 150-kDa complex by immunoaffinity chromatography contained approximately 54% of the total ALS immunoreactivity. Collectively, our results support the existence of excess amounts of uncomplexed ALS in circulation, but demonstrate the level to be somewhat higher than about 30% of the total levels previously reported (17). Variations in assay design and specificity for the complexed and uncomplexed ALS as well as expected differences in sample population may be among the contributing factors. These variations may well be responsible for the differences in total ALS measured by different methods. The mean serum ALS in randomly selected adults by the present method was 13.0 ± 4.4 mg/L, whereas mean RIA value for a group of normal adults was 24.2 ± mg/L.

ALS measured by the present method eluted in a sharp peak at about 150 kDa in association with IGFBP-3 and IGF-I. The fact that similar to previous observations (17), both forms of ALS exhibited identical gel filtration profiles, appearing in a single superimposable peak with that of the 150-kDa complex, clearly indicates the inadequacy of size exclusion chromatography as a means of ALS separation. Surprisingly, acidified or SDS-treated ALS migrated with a molecular mass of about 400–500 kDa. The unexpected shift in ALS immunoreactivity was not altered after neutralization of acidified samples or addition of substances in the neutralization buffer that could potentially affect protein solubility and, thus, chromatographic migration. Indeed, migration at approximately 400–500 kDa was characteristic of functionally inactive ALS molecules, as identical gel filtration profiles were obtained when isolated 150-kDa ternary complex was subjected to acid-neutralization or SDS treatment and rechromatographed. Whether the observed increase in the apparent molecular size of ALS is due to unfolding and linearalization of the molecule or, less likely, the possibility of ALS aggregation into multimeric forms remains to be investigated. Similar to the effect of acidification (11, 12, 13, 14), SDS-treated ALS was functionally inactive and could not support formation of the 150-kDa complex in reconstitution experiments.

In several experiments, total ALS levels in randomly selected serum samples were more closely related to IGFBP-3 levels than to those of IGF-I or IGF-II. Whether the highly parallel association between ALS and IGFBP-3 is suggestive of coregulation of their production or is in some way reflective of association of all of the circulating IGFBP-3 with ALS through IGF-dependent (17) or independent (15) mechanisms remains to be clarified. The results of the present study confirm the GH dependency of ALS and demonstrated that the total ALS levels in GH deficiency are generally lower than those in normal controls, whereas levels are elevated in acromegalic subjects. Although difficulties in the proper diagnosis of GH deficiency (27) may be partly responsible for the observed overlap in ALS levels, the free ALS ELISA showed a more overlapping classification of the various patient groups. As noted earlier, this may be expected, as significant increases in ALS immunoreactivity and, thus, its apparent concentration could be induced by changes in its native molecular conformation. We postulate that conditions that could minimally alter native conformation of ALS could lead to significant alteration of its immunoreactivity and potentially mask the free ALS ELISA response to true changes in ALS levels. Because of this unfavorable characteristic, the free ALS levels recognized by the present method may not totally reflect the true diagnostic potential of free ALS measurements. In the present study, frozen samples undergoing at least two freeze/thaw cycles were employed. Freeze/thawing of samples may potentially alter ALS conformation and, thus, its apparent immunoreactivity. This is in contrast to the total ALS analysis in which a novel sample pretreatment procedure ensures optimal dissociation and unfolding of ALS. In the preliminary comparison to IGF-I and IGFBP-3, the total ALS analysis appeared at least equally effective in classifying the various sample groups. These findings strongly support the usefulness of total ALS analysis in the clinical assessment of GH abnormalities and indicate the need for further evaluation of its diagnostic potentials.

The findings of relatively low ALS levels in amniotic fluid and seminal plasma are in agreement with previous reports that described either low levels of immunoreactive ALS (17) or undetectable levels of the 150-kDa complex (28, 29) in amniotic fluid and seminal plasma. Consistent with the reported presence of the 150-kDa complex in interstitial (30) and peritoneal (31) fluid, synovial fluid contained relatively high levels of ALS. In contrast, little or no ALS immunoreactivity was detectable in cerebrospinal fluid and human milk. Although the origin and potential role of extravascular ALS have not been investigated, it is most likely derived from vascular sources, where uncomplexed ALS, on the average, constitutes about 50% of the total circulating levels.

In conclusion, we demonstrated the development of a simple ALS ELISA that incorporates site-specific antibodies and a new approach for total ALS analysis. We have shown that circulating ALS is about 50% uncomplexed and appears at more than 400 kDa on gel filtration in response to SDS or acid treatment. Circulating ALS is more tightly associated with IGFBP-3 than IGF-I or IGF-II, and its determinations may be of significant value in the differential diagnosis of GH-related disorders. Except for synovial fluid, most biological fluids evaluated contained little or no ALS immunoreactivity, suggesting the circulation to be the primary source of extravascular ALS. Development of ALS ELISA should facilitate further clinical and research investigations of this unique binding protein.

Received May 19, 1997.

Revised August 13, 1997.

Accepted August 26, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rotwein P. 1991 Structure, evolution, expression and regulation of insulin-like growth factors I and II [Review]. Growth Factors. 5:3–18.[Medline]
  2. Daughaday WH, Rotwein P. 1989 Insulin-like growth factors I and II. Peptide, messenger ribonucleic acid and gene structures, serum and tissue concentration [Review]. Endocr Rev. 10:68–91.[Abstract]
  3. LeRoith D, Adamo M, Werner H, Roberts Jr CT. 1991 Insulin-like growth factors, and their receptors as growth regulators in normal physiology and pathological states [Review]. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2:134–139.[CrossRef]
  4. Jones JI, Clemmons DR. 1995 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions [Review]. Endocr Rev. 16:3–34.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Rosenfeld RG, Lamson G, Pham H, et al. 1990 Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins [Review]. Recent Prog Horm Res. 46:99–163.
  6. Shimasaki S, Ling N. 1991 Identification and molecular characterization of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBP-1, -2, -3, 4, -5 and 6) [Review]. Prog Growth Factor Res. 1:243–266.
  7. Lamson G, Giudice L, Rosenfeld R. 1991 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins: structural and molecular relationships [Review]. Growth Factors. 5:19–28.[Medline]
  8. Holly JMP, Martin JI. 1994 IGFBPs: a review of methodological aspects of their purification, analysis and regulation [Review]. Growth Regul. 4(Suppl):20–30.
  9. Cohen P, Rosenfeld RG. 1994 Physiologic and clinical relevance of the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins [Review]. Curr Opin Pediatr. 6:462–467.[Medline]
  10. Oh Y, Nagalla SR, Yamanaka Y, et al. 1996 Synthesis and characterization of insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-7. J Biol Chem. 271:30322–30325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Furlanetto RM. 1980 The somatomedin C binding protein: evidence for a heterologous subunit structure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 51:12–19.[Medline]
  12. Hintz RL, Liu F. 1980 Somatomedin plasma binding proteins. In: Pecile A, Muller EE, eds. Growth hormone and other biologically active peptide. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica; 133–143.
  13. Baxter RC. 1988 Characterization of the acid-labile subunit of the growth hormone dependent insulin-like growth factor binding protein complex. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 67:265–272.[Abstract]
  14. Baxter RC, Martin JL, Beniac VA. 1989 High molecular weight insulin-like growth factor binding protein complex. Purification properties of the acid-labile subunit from human serum. J Biol Chem. 264:11843–11848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Barreca A, Ponzani P, Arvigo M, Giordano G, Minuto F. 1995 Effect of the acid-labile subunit on the binding of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-3 to [125I]IGF-I. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:1318–1324.[Abstract]
  16. Baxter RC, Martin Jl. 1989 Structure of the Mr 140,000 growth factor binding protein complex: determination by reconstitution and affinity labeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 86:6898–6902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Baxter RC. 1990 Circulating levels and molecular distribution of the acid-labile subunit of the high molecular weight insulin-like growth factor binding protein complex. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:1347–1353.[Abstract]
  18. Leong SL, Baxter RC, Camerato T, Dai J, Wood WI. 1992 Structure and function expression of the acid labile subunit of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein complex. Mol Endocrinol. 6:870–876.[Abstract]
  19. Chin E, Zhou J, Dai J, Baxter RC, Bondy CA. 1994 Cellular localization and regulation of gene expression for components of the insulin-like growth factor ternary binding protein complex. Endocrinology. 134:2498–2504.[Abstract]
  20. Khosravi MJ, Morton RC. 1991 Novel application of streptavidin-hapten derivative as protein-tracer conjugate in competitive-type immunoassays involving biotinylated detection probes. Clin Chem. 37:58–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Khosravi MJ, Papanastasiou-Diamandi A, Mistry J. 1995 Ultrasensitive immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen based on conventional colorimetric detection. Clin Biochem. 28:407–414.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Liu F, Hintz RL, Khare A, Diaugstine RP, Powell DR, Lee PDK. 1994 Immunoblot studies of IGF-related acid-labile subunit. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:1883–1886.[Abstract]
  23. Khosravi MJ, Diamandi A, Mistry J, Lee PDK. 1996 A non-competitive ELISA for human serum insulin-like growth factor-1. Clin Chem. 42:1147–1154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Khosravi MJ, Diamandis A, Mistry J. 1997 Immunoassay of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1. Clin Chem. 43:523–532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Khosravi MJ, Diamandis A, Mistry J. Development of a non-competitive immunoenzymometric assay for human insulin-like growth factor-II in serum. Proc of the 10th Int Congr of Endocrinol. 1996; 3–551.
  26. Diamandis A, Khosravi MJ, Mistry J, Mathew G. A non-isotopic immunoenzymatic assay for insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in serum. Proc of the 77th Annual Meet of The Endocrine Soc. 1995; 2–328.
  27. Rosenfeld RG, Albertsson-Wikland K, Cassorla F, et al. 1995 Diagnostic controversy: the diagnosis of childhood growth hormone deficiency revisited. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:1532–1540.[Free Full Text]
  28. D’Ercole AJ, Drop SLS, Kortleve DJ. 1985 Somatomedin C/insulin-like growth factor -I binding proteins in human amniotic fluid and in fetal and postnatal blood: evidence of immunological homology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 61:612–619.[Abstract]
  29. Rosenfeld RG, Pham H, Oh Y, Lamson G, Giudice L. 1990 Identification of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) and low molecular weight IGFBP in human seminal plasma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:551–553.[Abstract]
  30. Xu S, Cwyfan-Hughes SC, Van der Stappen JWJ, et al. 1995 Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF-binding proteins in human skin interstitial fluid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:2940–2945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Bowsher RR, Lee WH, Apathy JM, O’Brien PJ, Ferguson AL, Henry DP. 1991 Measurement of insulin-like growth factor-II in physiological fluids and tissues. I. An improved extraction procedure and radioimmunoassay for human and rat fluids. Endocrinology. 128:805–814.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. F. Collett-Solberg, M. Misra, and on behalf of the Drug and Therapeutics Committee o
The Role of Recombinant Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I in Treating Children with Short Stature
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 10 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. M. Domene, P. A. Scaglia, A. Lteif, F. H. Mahmud, S. Kirmani, J. Frystyk, P. Bedecarras, M. Gutierrez, and H. G. Jasper
Phenotypic Effects of Null and Haploinsufficiency of Acid-Labile Subunit in a Family with Two Novel IGFALS Gene Mutations
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4444 - 4450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. C. Nindl, J. A. Alemany, M. D. Kellogg, J. Rood, S. A. Allison, A. J. Young, and S. J. Montain
Utility of circulating IGF-I as a biomarker for assessing body composition changes in men during periods of high physical activity superimposed upon energy and sleep restriction
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 340 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
K. M Morrison, M. Bidlingmaier, S. Stadler, Z. Wu, L. Skriver, and C. J Strasburger
Sample pre-treatment determines the clinical usefulness of acid-labile subunit immunoassays in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency and acromegaly
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2007; 156(3): 331 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
K. Pazaitou-Panayiotou, T. Kelesidis, I. Kelesidis, A. Kaprara, J. Blakeman, I. Vainas, A. Mpousoulegas, C. J Williams, and C. Mantzoros
Growth hormone-binding protein is directly and IGFBP-3 is inversely associated with risk of female breast cancer
Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2007; 156(2): 187 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. H. Rasmussen, A. Juul, L. L. Kjems, and J. Hilsted
Effects of short-term caloric restriction on circulating free IGF-I, acid-labile subunit, IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs)-1-4, and IGFBPs-1-3 protease activity in obese subjects.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 155(4): 575 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. A. Feelders, M. Bidlingmaier, C. J. Strasburger, J. A. M. J. L. Janssen, P. Uitterlinden, L. J. Hofland, S. W. J. Lamberts, A. J. van der Lely, and W. W. de Herder
Postoperative Evaluation of Patients with Acromegaly: Clinical Significance and Timing of Oral Glucose Tolerance Testing and Measurement of (Free) Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Acid-Labile Subunit, and Growth Hormone-Binding Protein Levels
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2005; 90(12): 6480 - 6489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. M. Domene, S. V. Bengolea, A. S. Martinez, M. G. Ropelato, P. Pennisi, P. Scaglia, J. J. Heinrich, and H. G. Jasper
Deficiency of the Circulating Insulin-like Growth Factor System Associated with Inactivation of the Acid-Labile Subunit Gene
N. Engl. J. Med., February 5, 2004; 350(6): 570 - 577.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. C. Nindl, J. W. Castellani, A. J. Young, J. F. Patton, M. J. Khosravi, A. Diamandi, and S. J. Montain
Differential responses of IGF-I molecular complexes to military operational field training
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2003; 95(3): 1083 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. H. W. Lange, J. L. Andersen, N. Beyer, F. Isaksson, B. Larsson, M. H. Rasmussen, A. Juul, J. Bulow, and M. Kjar
GH Administration Changes Myosin Heavy Chain Isoforms in Skeletal Muscle But Does Not Augment Muscle Strength or Hypertrophy, Either Alone or Combined with Resistance Exercise Training in Healthy Elderly Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 513 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Marzullo, C. Di Somma, K. L. Pratt, J. Khosravi, A. Diamandis, G. Lombardi, A. Colao, and R. G. Rosenfeld
Usefulness of Different Biochemical Markers of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Family in Diagnosing Growth Hormone Excess and Deficiency in Adults
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2001; 86(7): 3001 - 3008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. C. Nindl, W. J. Kraemer, J. O. Marx, P. J. Arciero, K. Dohi, M. D. Kellogg, and G. A. Loomis
Overnight responses of the circulating IGF-I system after acute, heavy-resistance exercise
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2001; 90(4): 1319 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Arosio, S. Garrone, P. Bruzzi, G. Faglia, F. Minuto, and A. Barreca
Diagnostic Value of the Acid-Labile Subunit in Acromegaly: Evaluation in Comparison with Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) I, and IGF-Binding Protein-1, -2, and -3
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2001; 86(3): 1091 - 1098.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
H. Yu and T. Rohan
Role of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Family in Cancer Development and Progression
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 20, 2000; 92(18): 1472 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Diamandi, J. Mistry, R. G. Krishna, and J. Khosravi
Immunoassay of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 (IGFBP-3): New Means to Quantifying IGFBP-3 Proteolysis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2000; 85(6): 2327 - 2333.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. E. Wilson
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Replacement during Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonism Normalizes Serum IGF-Binding Protein-3 and Markers of Bone Formation in Ovariectomized Rhesus Monkeys
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2000; 85(4): 1557 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text]