help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marinó, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mariotti, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marinó, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mariotti, S.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 2 438-443
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Clinical Studies

Mild Clinical Expression of Myasthenia Gravis Associated with Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases1

Michele Marinó, Roberta Ricciardi, Aldo Pinchera, Giuseppe Barbesino, Luca Manetti, Luca Chiovato, Lewis E. Braverman, Bruno Rossi, Alberto Muratorio and Stefano Mariotti

Institutes of Endocrinology (M.M., A.P., G.B., L.M., L.C.) and Neurology (R.R., B.R., A.M.), University of Pisa, Pisa; and the Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Cagliari (S.M.), Cagliari, Italy; and the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Massachusetts (L.E.B.), Worcester, Massachusetts 01655

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Aldo Pinchera, M.D., Institute of Endocrinology, University of Pisa, Viale del Tirreno 64, 56018 Tirrenia-Pisa, Italy.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Myasthenia gravis (MG) may occur in association with autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the features of MG associated with AITD compared to those of MG without AITD. A total of 129 MG patients (34 men and 95 women; age range, 11–81 yr) were subdivided into: group A, 56 MG patients with AITD [25 with autoimmune thyroiditis and 31 with Graves’ disease (GD)]; group B, 21 MG patients with nonautoimmune thyroid diseases; and group C, 52 MG patients without thyroid disease. The severity of MG was ranked according to the Osserman score. Laboratory evaluation included assays for antithyroid and antiacetylcholine receptor (AchRAb) antibodies.

Ocular MG (Osserman’s class 1) was more frequent in group A (41.0%) than in group B (14.2%; P < 0.03) or C (21.4%; P < 0.03). Severe generalized MG (classes >=2B) was more frequent in groups B (57.1%; P < 0.03) and C (51.9%; P < 0.02) than in group A (28.5%). GD patients with clinical evidence of ophthalmopathy had a higher frequency (P = 0.05) of ocular MG (57.8%) than GD patients without clinical ophthalmopathy (16.6%). Thymic disease was less frequent in group A (26.7%) than in group B (71.4%; P = 0.001) or C (59.7%; P = 0.001). The prevalence of thymic hyperplasia was 17.8%, 38.0%, and 40.3% in groups A, B, and C, respectively; the prevalence of thymoma was 8.9%, 33.4%, and 19.4%. When only patients with generalized MG were considered, thymic disease was less frequent (P < 0.02) in group A (40.6%) than in the remaining groups (69.4%). AchRAb was more frequent in groups B (57.1%) and C (57.6%; P < 0.03) than in group A (35.7%).

In conclusion, MG associated with AITD has a mild clinical expression, with preferential ocular involvement and lower frequency of thymic disease and AchRAb. This supports the hypothesis that ocular and generalized MG are separate diseases with different spectra of associated diseases. Nonautoimmune thyroid diseases have no influence on the features of MG. The association of ocular MG and AITD might be due to a common autoimmune mechanism and/or a peculiar genetic background.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MYASTHENIA GRAVIS (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by impaired neuromuscular transmission due to circulating antiacetylcholine receptor autoantibodies (AchRAb) (1). The frequent association of MG with thymic disease, such as follicular hyperplasia and thymoma, suggests that the thymus plays a role in its pathogenesis (1, 2, 3). The clinical expression of MG varies, ranging from a mild localized disease such as ocular MG (OMG) to a severe generalized disease (4). Epidemiological, clinical, and serological studies have suggested that OMG and generalized MG (GMG) may be separate diseases (5, 6, 7, 8, 9).

Patients with MG may have evidence of coexisting autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD) (8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20) as well as other autoimmune disorders (21, 22). Epidemiological studies showed that AITD occur in approximately 5–10% of MG patients (17, 18), whereas a fairly low incidence of MG (~0.2%) has been reported in patients with AITD (18). A higher frequency of thyroid antibodies has been observed in OMG compared to GMG (8), but this increased association between OMG and thyroid autoimmunity has not been confirmed (13, 14, 15, 16). Thus, the question of whether the clinical expression of MG associated with AITD is different from that observed in MG without thyroid autoimmunity remains unresolved.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and serological features of MG associated with AITD in a large number of patients. Results were compared to those found in MG patients with nonautoimmune thyroid diseases (N-AITD) and without thyroid disorders.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

A total of 129 MG patients (34 men and 95 women; age range, 11–81 yr) were studied. Ninety-one consecutive patients referred to the Institute of Neurology for MG (18 with OMG and 73 with GMG) were screened for thyroid disease. Among these 91 patients, 39 had thyroid disease (26 AITD and 13 N-AITD). The remaining 38 MG patients (19 with OMG and 19 with GMG) were obtained from approximately 20,000 consecutive patients referred to the Institute of Endocrinology for thyroid disease from 1980 to 1995. Among these 38 patients, 30 had AITD and 8 had N-AITD. Thus, 77 patients had coexistent MG and thyroid disorders. Thirty-seven had a diagnosis of thyroid disease made before the diagnosis of MG (median interval, 20.3 months), whereas 40 patients had a diagnosis of thyroid disease after the recognition of MG (median interval, 28.8 months). When they entered the study, 31 of the 129 MG patients were being treated with pyrodostigmine, 4 were being treated with prednisone, and 83 were being given both drugs. Azathioprine was given to 19 patients.

For the purpose of this study patients with MG were subdivided into 3 groups. Group A consisted of 56 MG patients with AITD (9 men and 47 women; age range, 13–81 yr). Twenty-five patients had autoimmune thyroiditis (AT); 22 had typical Hashimoto’s thyroiditis [HT; 15 untreated at entry (8 euthyroid and 7 with clinical or subclinical hypothyroidism) and 7 treated with L-T4 (2 euthyroid and 5 hypothyroid], and 3 had euthyroid nodular goiter with focal autoimmune thyroiditis and were not treated. Thirty-one patients had Graves’ disease (GD); 3 were untreated hyperthyroid, 14 were euthyroid receiving methimazole, 10 were euthyroid receiving L-T4 therapy after thyroidectomy or radioiodine treatment, and 4 had euthyroid GD (Graves’ ophthalmopathy with no evidence of hyperthyroidism). Among GD patients, 19 had clinical evidence of Graves’ ophthalmopathy, as assessed by physical examination. Clinical ophthalmopathy was characterized in all cases by moderate or severe exophthalmos associated with signs and symptoms of soft tissue inflammation. Eye muscles were enlarged in all patients with clinical ophthalmopathy, as assessed by orbital computerized tomography (CT). Diplopia was present in 16 patients. Involvement of optical nerves at CT was present in 4 patients. In the 12 GD patients with no clinical evidence of ophthalmopathy, orbital CT was not performed. Therefore, for the purpose of the present study, Graves’ ophthalmopathy was defined as a clinically detectable condition.

Group B consisted of 21 MG patients with associated N-AITD (5 men and 16 women; age range, 22–77 yr). Two had toxic adenoma and were euthyroid after radioiodine treatment, and 19 had nontoxic nodular goiter (13 untreated and 6 receiving L-T4).

Group C consisted of 52 MG patients with no evidence of associated thyroid disorders (20 men and 32 women; age range, 11–76 yr).

Clinical and serological investigation

Neurological evaluation. All patients underwent neurological assessment, which included physical examination and a Tensilon (edrophonium) test. A repetitive nerve stimulation test (Desmedt test) was performed when necessary. All patients had CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the mediastinum performed. Patients with thymic enlargement at CT or MRI were submitted to thymectomy. The diagnosis of thymic hyperplasia or thymoma was based on histological findings. AchRAb was assayed in all patients using a commercial kit (acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies, Immuno Biological Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany).

Thyroid evaluation. All patients underwent a thyroid evaluation, which included physical examination, thyroid ultrasonography, and the following thyroid tests: free thyroid hormones (free T4 and free T3 RIA, Lysophase, Technogenetics, Milan, Italy), TSH (Ultrasensitive-TSH immunoradiometric assay, Delfia, Wallac, Finland), antithyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAb; anti-Tg MELISA, Byk Gulden, Milan, Italy), and antithyroperoxidase autoantibodies (TPOAb; anti-TPO RIA, Sorin Biomedica, Saluggia, Italy). The following tests were also carried out when necessary: anti-TSH receptor autoantibodies (TRAb; TRAb immunoradiometric assay, Henning, Berlin, Germany), thyroid scan, and thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy. Patients with clinical evidence of Graves’ ophthalmopathy had an orbital CT performed.

Diagnostic criteria

The diagnosis of MG was based on the presence of muscular weakness and abnormal fatigability aggravated by exercise and was confirmed by the Tensilon and Desmedt tests (1). GMG was diagnosed in patients with systemic muscle involvement in whom iv edrophonium administration was associated with unequivocal improvement in an objectively weak muscle (1, 23). The Desmedt test confirmed the diagnosis of GMG in patients showing an equivocal response to the Tensilon test (1, 24). OMG was diagnosed in patients with restricted ocular symptoms (diplopia and palpebral ptosis) and a clear improvement in eye muscle weakness a few seconds after the iv administration of edrophonium (1, 23). None of the OMG patients had generalized muscle involvement during a follow-up period of almost 2 yr. The diagnosis of both OMG and GMG was confirmed by the amelioration of muscle weakness during chronic treatment with pyridostigmine. The severity of MG was ranked according to the Osserman score (4): class 1, OMG; class 2A, GMG with no bulbar involvement; class 2B, GMG with bulbar involvement; class 3, acute rapidly progressive GMG; and class 4, severe GMG with myopathy.

The diagnosis of GD was based on the presence of hyperthyroidism (25) and/or Graves’ ophthalmopathy associated with diffuse goiter and circulating thyroid antibodies including TRAb (26). The diagnosis of ophthalmopathy in all GD patients with clinical evidence of Graves’ ophthalmopathy was confirmed by the presence of eye muscle enlargement and an increase in fibroadipose retrobulbar tissue determined by CT (27). Euthyroid GD was diagnosed in patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy who did not have previous or actual clinical and biochemical evidence of hyperthyroidism. This was always associated with small diffuse goiter, circulating thyroid antibodies (including TRAb), and undetectable TSH. Patients with clearly diagnosed Graves’ ophthalmopathy who had an unequivocal improvement of palpebral ptosis and diplopia after the iv administration of edrophonium were diagnosed as having coexistent Graves’ ophthalmopathy and OMG. The improvement of diplopia, but not of palpebral ptosis, after the Tensilon administration was not considered a sufficient criterion for the diagnosis of OMG in patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. All patients with primary hypothyroidism associated with positive TgAb/TPOAb were considered to have HT. The diagnosis of HT was also made in patients with positive TgAb/TPOAb associated with a firm goiter and a hypoechogenic pattern on ultrasound examination of the gland and/or lymphocytic infiltration at fine needle aspiration biopsy (28, 29, 30, 31). Patients with nodular goiter and circulating TPOAb at high levels (range, 277-2000 U/mL) were considered to have nodular goiter with focal autoimmune thyroiditis (28) and were included in group 1. Five euthyroid patients with nodular goiter and circulating TPOAb at low levels (range, 12–47 U/mL) did not have a hypoechogenic pattern on ultrasound examination or lymphocytic infiltration on fine needle aspiration biopsy. Furthermore, none of them had a family history of AITD. Therefore, for the purpose of the present study, these 5 patients were considered to have N-AITD (32) and were included in group B.

Statistical analysis

Results were analyzed by {chi}2 test, using a personal computer software (Stat-View, Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Distribution of Osserman’s classes

As shown in Table 1Go and Fig. 1Go, OMG (class 1) was more frequent in group A (41.0%) than in group B (14.2%; P < 0.03) or C (21.4%; P < 0.03). The frequency of mild GMG (class 2A) was similar among the three groups. The frequency of bulbar, acute, and severe GMG (classes 2B, 3, and 4 grouped together) was higher in groups B (57.1%; P < 0.03) and C (51.9%; P < 0.02) than in group A (28.5%). Classes 3 and 4 were observed only in group C (two and one patients, respectively). No difference was observed between groups B and C and in group A between GD (with or without ophthalmopathy) and AT (data not shown). GD patients with clinical evidence of ophthalmopathy had a higher frequency (P = 0.05) of ocular MG (57.8%) than GD patients without clinical ophthalmopathy (16.6%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical and laboratory features of MG patients with coexistent AITD (group A) or N-AITD (group B) and without associated thyroid disorders (group C)

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Distribution of Osserman’s classes (class 1, ocular MG; class 2A, generalized MG with no bulbar involvement; class >=2B, generalized MG with bulbar involvement) in MG patients with associated AITD (group A), with associated N-AITD (group B), or without thyroid disorders (group C).

 
Thymic involvement

Sixty-one of 129 patients had an abnormal thymus; 39 patients had thymic hyperplasia, and 22 had thymoma. Fifty-four of the 61 patients with thymic abnormalities had a thymectomy before entering the study, and the remaining 7 underwent thymectomy after entering the study. No evidence of thymic enlargement was detected by CT or MRI in the remaining 68 patients. As expected, the frequency of thymic disease was lower in patients with OMG (8.8%) than in those with GMG (63.0%).

Thymic disease was less frequently observed in group A (26.7%) than in groups B (71.4%; P = 0.001) and C (59.7%; P = 0.001; Fig. 2Go). When the frequencies of various thymic diseases were analyzed (Table 1Go and Fig. 2Go), a lower prevalence of thymic hyperplasia was observed in group A (17.8%) than in group B (38.0%) or C (40.3%); the difference was statistically significant between groups A and C (P < 0.01). Similarly, the prevalence of thymoma was lower in group A (8.9%) than in group B (33.4%) or C (19.4%), with a statistically significant difference between groups A and B (P < 0.01). The frequency of thymic disease did not differ between groups B and C or in group A between GD and AT (data not shown). No difference in thymic disease was observed between GD patients with or without ophthalmopathy (data not shown). Among patients with GMG (Osserman classes >1), the frequency of thymic disease was significantly lower (P < 0.005) in patients in group A (40.0%) than in those in groups B and C taken together (69.0%; Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Thymic disease in MG with associated AITD (group A), with associated N-AITD (group B), and without thyroid disorders (group C). Upper panel, Prevalence of thymic involvement. Middle panel, Prevalence of thymic hyperplasia and thymoma. Lower panel, Prevalence of thymic involvement in generalized MG patients.

 
Serum TgAb and TPOAb

As expected, the frequency of TgAb and TPOAb was higher in group A (TgAb, 37.5%; TPOAb, 78.5%) than in groups B (TgAb 0%; TPOAb 8.7%) and C (TgAb, 0%; TPOAb, 15.3%; Table 1Go and Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Circulating antibodies in MG with associated AITD (group A), with associated N-AITD (group B), and without thyroid disorders (group C). Upper panel, Prevalence of circulating TgAb and TPOAb. Lower panel, Prevalence of AchRAb.

 
Serum AchRAb

As expected, AchRAb was less frequent in patients with OMG (8.1%) than in those with GMG (64.1%). As shown in Table 1Go and in Fig. 3Go, the prevalence of AchRAb was higher in groups B (57.1%) and C (57.6%) than in group A (35.7%), with a statistically significant difference between groups A and C (P < 0.03). No difference was observed between groups B and C.

Analysis of MG features in AITD patients according to their referral to different institutions

To determine whether the referral of patients to two different institutions influenced our results, patients with MG and AITD were subdivided according to their referral to the Institute of Neurology or to the Institute of Endocrinology. As shown in Table 2Go, no difference was observed for any of the clinical or serological features of MG between the two referral sites.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Clinical and laboratory features of MG patients with coexistent AITD according to their referral site

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MG is an autoimmune neuromuscular disorder often associated with thymic disease (1, 2, 3). Its clinical presentation varies from a mild ocular to a severe generalized disease, but the question of whether OMG and GMG are different diseases is controversial (5, 6, 7, 8, 9). The hypothesis that they are separate diseases is supported by several features, such as the greater frequency of thymic disease and serum AchRAb in GMG compared to OMG (6, 7, 8). The coexistence of other autoimmune diseases in MG is well recognized (1, 10, 11, 21, 22), including the association with AITD (8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20). However, the influence of AITD on the clinical expression of MG has not been defined. Whether AITD is more frequently associated with OMG or GMG has not been carefully evaluated, and scanty data are available on the prevalence of thymic disease and serum AchRAb in MG with coexistent AITD (8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16). The features of MG associated with N-AITD have not been reported, and whether the clinical expression of MG with coexistent AITD is related to thyroid disease per se or to its autoimmune component remains to be clarified.

In the present study we evaluated the clinical and serological features of MG associated with AITD compared with those found in MG patients with N-AITD or without thyroid disease. The clinical presentation of MG associated with AITD was characterized by neuromuscular involvement, frequently restricted to the eye muscles. In contrast, GMG was more frequent in MG patients with N-AITD and in those without thyroid disease. Thymic abnormalities were less frequent in MG associated with AITD than in MG without thyroid autoimmunity. This lower frequency of thymic abnormalities in AITD patients was also present when only OMG patients were considered. Moreover, the prevalence of serum AchRAb was lower in patients with AITD than in the other groups of MG patients. The majority of MG patients without thyroid autoimmunity had GMG and were receiving immunosuppressive therapy when they entered the study. Therefore, this difference in circulating AchRAb is almost certainly greater in untreated patients.

Our finding of an increased association between OMG and thyroid autoimmunity supports the observation of Garlepp et al. (8), who reported a greater frequency of thyroid antibodies in OMG than in GMG. On the other hand, a higher frequency of associated autoimmune disorders (including AITD) in GMG compared to OMG has been observed by others (13, 14, 15, 16). This discrepancy might be due to the different diagnostic criteria employed and/or the limited number of patients studied. Furthermore, several earlier studies on the association of MG with thyroid disease failed to distinguish between autoimmune and nonautoimmune thyroid disorders (10, 11, 21, 22). In the present study a large number of patients with MG have been evaluated and subdivided on the basis of strict diagnostic criteria for their thyroid disorder. Patients with coexisting AITD or N-AITD have been studied. Our data clearly demonstrate that a milder clinical expression of MG occurs in patients with associated AITD than in those without thyroid autoimmunity. No difference was observed in any of the clinical and laboratory findings between MG patients with coexistent N-AITD and those without thyroid disease. This suggests that the mild clinical expression of MG associated with AITD is not related to the presence of a thyroid disorder per se, but to the presence of thyroid autoimmunity. In agreement, the coexistence of N-AITD has no effect on the type or the clinical course of MG, and the presence of goiter in MG patients should be considered a random association. The study was carried out in an Italian population from Tuscany, where mild to moderate iodine deficiency is still present, and the prevalence of endemic goiter ranges from 22–59% (33).

The reason for the association of AITD with ocular MG is unknown, but several hypotheses can be considered. First, OMG and GMG might actually represent separate diseases (5, 6, 7, 8, 9) with different spectra of associated diseases. Second, an immunological cross-reactivity against epitopes or autoantigens shared by the thyroid and the eye muscles might be the basis of this association. Several experimental data suggest that thyroid antigens are present in ocular tissues (34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42). Circulating autoantibodies directed to eye muscle components have been identified in GD and HT (36, 37, 43, 44) and recently also in GD patients with associated MG (45). Further studies are needed to clarify whether autoantibodies against antigens shared by the thyroid and the eye muscles are present in sera from patients with MG and AITD. In particular, it would be useful to evaluate the presence of autoantibodies directed against a membrane 64-kDa protein that has been suggested to play an important role in the pathogenesis of Graves’ ophthalmopathy (46, 47). A third explanation for the higher frequency of OMG in AITD could be that these disorders have a common genetic background. Among the various major histocompatibility complex (MHC) haplotypes associated with AITD and MG (48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53), a high frequency of human leukocyte antigen-B8 and -DR3 has been reported in both disorders (48, 49, 50). A difference in the MHC repertoire was also found between OMG and GMG (6, 12, 54, 55), supporting the hypothesis that they are separate entities. Further studies are needed to evaluate the MHC repertoire in MG patients with associated AITD compared to MG patients without associated AITD.

In conclusion, MG associated with AITD has a mild clinical expression characterized by preferential involvement of the eye muscles. This is consistent with the hypothesis that OMG and GMG are separate diseases with different spectra of associated diseases and different immunogenetic backgrounds. The association of OMG with AITD might also be due to a common immunopathogenetic mechanisms acting through antigens shared by the eye muscles and the thyroid. Further immunological and genetic studies are needed to verify these hypotheses. The important clinical implication of this study is that the coexistence of MG with thyroid autoimmunity might have prognostic relevance in the identification of a subgroup of MG patients with a mild form of the disease.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the National Research Council (CNR Rome, Italy; Target Project: Biotechnology and Bioinstrumentation, Grant 91.01219, PF70; Target Project: Prevention and Control of Disease Factors (FATMA), Grant 93.00689, PF 41; EEC Stimulation Action-Science Plan Contract SC1-CT91-0707) and Grant DK-18919 from the NIH (Bethesda, MD). Back

Received May 8, 1996.

Revised September 4, 1996.

Accepted October 18, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Drachman DB. 1994 Myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med. 330:1797–1810.[Free Full Text]
  2. Kao I, Drachman DB. 1977 Thymic muscle cells bear acetylcholine receptors: possible relation to myasthenia gravis. Science. 195:74–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Schluep M, Willcox N, Vincent A, Dhoot GK, Newsom-Davis J. 1987 Acetylcholine receptors in human thymic myoid cells in situ: an immunohistological study. Ann Neurol. 22:212–222.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Osserman KE. 1953 Myasthenia gravis. New York: Grune and Stratton; 80.
  5. Bartoccioni E, Scuderi F, Evoli A, Provenzano C, Flamini G. 1986 Ocular myasthenia gravis: two different disease. Lancet. 1:1038–1039.
  6. Zimmermann CW, Eblen F. 1993 Repertoires of autoantibodies against homologous eye muscle in ocular and generalized myasthenia gravis differ. Clin Invest. 71:445–451.[Medline]
  7. Seybold MB. 1983 Myasthenia gravis: a clinical and basic science review. JAMA. 205:2516–2521.
  8. Garlepp MJ, Dawkins RI, Christiansen FT. 1981 Autoimmunity in ocular and generalized myasthenia gravis. J Neuroimmunol. 1:325–332.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Tindall RSA. 1981 Humoral immunity in myasthenia gravis: biochemical characteristics of acquired antiacetylcholine receptor antibody and clinical correlations. Ann Neurol. 10:437–447.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Rennie GE. 1908 Exophtalmic goitre combined with myasthenia gravis. Rev Neurol Psychiatry. 6:229–233.
  11. Drachman DB. 1962 Myasthenia gravis and the thyroid gland. N Engl J Med. 15:330–333.
  12. Tola MR, Caniatti LM, Casetta I, et al. 1994 Immunogenetic heterogeneity and associated autoimmune disorders in myasthenia gravis: a population-based survey in the province of Ferrara, northern Italy. Acta Neurol Scand. 90:318–323.[Medline]
  13. Thorlacius S, Aarli JA, Riise T, Matre R, Johnsen H. 1989 Associated disorders in myasthenia gravis: autoimmune disease and their relation to thymectomy. Acta Neurol Scand. 80:290–295.[Medline]
  14. Sherbaum WA, Schumm F, Maischc F, et al. 1983 Myasthenia gravis: overlap with polyendocrine autoimmunity. Klin Wochenschr. 61:509–515.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Aarli JA, Gilhus NE, Matre R. 1992 Myasthenia gravis with thymoma is not associated with an increased incidence of non-muscle autoimmune disorders. J Autoimmun. 11:159–562.[CrossRef]
  16. Christiensen PB, Jensen TS, Tsitopulos I, et al. 1995 Associated autoimmune disorders in myasthenia gravis. Acta Neurol Scand. 91:192–195.[Medline]
  17. Kiessling WR, Finke R, Kotulla P, Schleusener H. 1982 Circulating TSH-binding inhibiting immunoglobulins in myasthenia gravis. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 101:41–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Peacey SR, Belchetz PE. 1993 Graves’ disease associated with ocular myasthenia gravis and thymic cyst. J R Soc Med. 86:297–298.[Medline]
  19. Sahay BM, Blendis LM, Raymond G. 1965 Relation between myasthenia gravis and thyroid disease. Br Med J. 1:762–765.
  20. Millikan CH, Haines SF. 1953 The thyroid gland in relation to neuromuscular disease. Arch Intern Med. 92:5–39.
  21. Oosterhuis HJGH. 1964 Studies in myasthenia gravis. I. A clinical study of 180 patients. J Neurol Sci. 1:512–546.
  22. Galbraith RF, Summerskill WHJ, Murray J. 1964 Systemic lupus erythematosus, cirrhosis and ulcerative colitis after thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med. 270:229–232.
  23. Daroff RB. 1986 The office Tensilon test for ocular myasthenia gravis. Arch Neurol. 43:843–844.[Medline]
  24. Keesey JC. 1989 Electrodiagnostic approach to defects of neuromuscular transmission. Muscle Nerve. 12:613–626.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Braverman LE, Utiger RD. 1991 Introduction to thyrotoxicosis. In: Braverman LE, Utiger RD, eds. Werner and Ingbar’s: the thyroid. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 645–647.
  26. Vitti P, Elisei R, Tonacchera M, et al. 1993 Detection of thyroid stimulating antibody using Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with cloned human thyrotropin receptor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:499–503.
  27. Burch HB, Wartofsky L. 1993 Graves’ ophthalmopathy: current concepts regarding pathogenesis and management. Endocr Rev. 14:747–793.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Marcocci C, Vitti P, Cetani F, Catalano F, Concetti R, Pinchera A. 1991 Thyroid ultrasonography helps to identify patients with diffuse lymphocytic thyroiditis who are prone to develop hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 120:689–701.
  29. Mariotti S. Pisani S, Russova A, Pinchera A. 1982 A new solid-phase immunoradiometric assay for anti-thyroglobulin autoantibody. J Endocrinol Invest. 5:227–233.[Medline]
  30. Mariotti S, Caturegli P, Piccolo P, Barbesino G, Pinchera A. 1990 Antithyroid peroxidase autoantibodies in thyroid diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 7:661–669.
  31. Chiovato L, Vitti P, Bendinelli G, et al. 1994 Detection of antibodies blocking thyrotropin effect using hamster ovary cells transfected with the cloned human TSH receptor. J Endocrinol Invest. 17:809–816.[Medline]
  32. Fenzi GF, Giani C, Ceccarelli P, et al. 1986 Role of autoimmune and familial factors in goiter prevalence. Studies performed in moderately endemic area. J Endocrinol Invest. 9:161–164.[Medline]
  33. Aghini-Lombardi F, Antonangeli L, Vitti P, Pinchera A. 1993 Status of iodine nutrition in Italy. In: Delange F, ed. Iodine deficiency in Europe. New York: Plenum Press; 403–407.
  34. Schumacher M, Camp S, Maulet Y, et al. 1986 Primary structure of Torpedo californica acetylcholinesterase deduced from its cDNA sequence. Nature. 319:407–409.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Ludgate M, Swillens S, Mercken L, Vassart G. 1986 Homology between thyroglobulin and acetylcholinesterase: an explanation for pathogenesis of Graves’ ophtalmopathy? Lancet. 2:219–220.
  36. Ludgate ME, Dong Q, Soreq H, Mariotti S, Vassart G. 1989 The pathophysiological significance of a thyroglobulin-acetylcholinesterase shared epitope in patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 121:38–45.
  37. Ludgate M, Owada C, Pope R, Taylor P, Vassart G. 1987 Cross-reactivity antibodies to human thyroglobulin, and torpedo acetylcholinesterase in patient with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. In: Pinchera A, Ingbar SH, McKenzie JM, Fenzi GF, eds. Thyroid autoimmunity. New York: Plenum Press; 271–273.
  38. Weetman AP, Tse CK, Randall WR, Tsim KWR, Barnard EA. 1988 Acetylcolinesterase antibodies and thyroid autoimmunity. Clin Exp Immunol. 71:96–99.[Medline]
  39. Feliciello A, Porcellini A, Ciullo I, Bonavolontà G, Avvedimento EV, Fenzi G. 1993 Expression of thyrotropin-receptor in healthy and Graves’ disease retro-orbital tissue. Lancet. 342:337–338.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Mengitsu M, Lukes YG, Nagy HB, et al. 1994 TSH receptor gene expression in retroocular fibroblasts. J Endocrinol Invest. 17:437–441.[Medline]
  41. Paschke R, Elisei R, Vassart G, Ludgate M. 1993 Lack of evidence supporting the presence of mRNA for the thyrotropin receptor in extra-ocular muscle. J Endocrinol Invest. 16:329–332.[Medline]
  42. Heufelder AE, Bahn R. 1992 Evidence for the presence of a functional TSH-receptor in retroocular fibroblasts from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Exp Clin Endocrinol. 100:62–67.[Medline]
  43. Faryna M, Nauman J, Gardas A. 1985 Measurement of autoantibodies against human eye muscle plasma membranes in Graves’ ophtalmopathy. Br Med J. 290:191–192.
  44. Wang PW, Hiromatsu Y, Laryea E, Wosu L, How J, Wall JR. 1989 Immunologically mediated cytotoxicity against human eye muscle cells in Graves’ ophtalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 64:454–460.[Abstract]
  45. Mappouras DG, Philippou G, Haralambous S, et al. 1995 Antibodies to acetylcholinesterase cross-reacting with thyroglobulin in myasthenia gravis and Graves’ disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 100:336–343.[Medline]
  46. Wall JR, Triller H, Boucher A, Bernard NF, Salvi M, Ludgate M. 1993 Antibodies reactive with an intracellular epitope of a recombinant 64 kDa thyroid and eye muscle protein in patients with thyroid autoimmunity and ophtalmopathy. J Endocrinol Invest. 16:863–868.[Medline]
  47. Wall JR, Hayes M, Scalise D, et al. 1995 Native gel electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing of a 64-kilodalton eye muscle protein shows that it is an important target for serum autoantibodies in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy and not expressed in other skeletal muscle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:1226–1232.[Abstract]
  48. Weetman AP, McGregor AM. 1994 Autoimmune thyroid disease: further developments in our understanding. Endocr Rev. 15:788–830.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Pirskanen R, Tilikainen A, Hokkanen E. 1972 Histocompatibility (HLA) antigens associated with myasthenia gravis. A preliminary report. Ann Clin Res. 4:304–406.[Medline]
  50. Feltkamp TEW, Van Der Berg-Loonen PM, Nijenuis LE. 1974 Myasthenia gravis, autoantibodies and HLA antigens. Br Med J. 1:131–133.
  51. Ratanachaiyavong S, Fleming D, Janer M, Demaine AG, Willcox N, Newson-Davis J, et al. 1994 HLA-DPB1 polymorphism in patients with hyperthyroid Graves’ disease and early onset myasthenia gravis. Autoimmunity. 17:99–104.[Medline]
  52. Ratanachaiyavong S, Gunn CA, Bidwell EA, Darke C, Hall R, McGregor AM. 1990 DQA2 U allele: a genetic marker for relapse of Graves’ disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 32:241–251.[Medline]
  53. Bach JF, Caillat-Zucman S. 1993 Genetics of autoimmune endocrine disease. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 14:239–252.[Medline]
  54. Hawkins BR, Yu YL, Wong V, Woo E, Ip MS, Dawkins RL. 1989 Possible evidence for a variant of myasthenia gravis based on HLA and acetylcholine receptor antibody in Chinese patients. Q J Med. 70:235–241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Garlepp MJ, Dawkins RL, Christiansen FT. 1983 HLA antigens, and acetylcholine receptor antibodies in penicillamine induced myasthenia gravis. Br Med J. 286:338–340.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. W. Chu, P. N. Kao, J. L. Faul, and R. L. Doyle
High Prevalence of Autoimmune Thyroid Disease in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Chest, November 1, 2002; 122(5): 1668 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Marinò, L. Chiovato, J. A. Friedlander, F. Latrofa, A. Pinchera, and R. T. McCluskey
Serum Antibodies against Megalin (GP330) in Patients with Autoimmune Thyroiditis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 1999; 84(7): 2468 - 2474.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Weissel
Mild Clinical Expression of Myasthenia Gravis Associated with Autoimmune Thyroid Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 1997; 82(11): 3905 - 3905.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Marinó, G. Barbesino, L. Manetti, L. Chiovato, R. Ricciardi, B. Rossi, A. Muratorio, S. Mariotti, L. E. Braverman, and A. Pinchera
Mild Clinical Expression of Myasthenia Gravis Associated with Autoimmune Thyroid Disease--Authors' Response
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 1997; 82(11): 3905a - 3906.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marinó, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mariotti, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marinó, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mariotti, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals