| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Special Articles |
Institute of Reproductive Medicine of the University D-48129 Münster, Germany
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Unsuitable androgens |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-methyltestosterone, fluoxymesterone, and other 17
-alkylated
androgens (such as stanozolol) should be avoided. All the
17
-substituted steroids can cause increase in liver enzymes,
cholestasis, and peliosis of the liver, and even liver tumors (for
review, see ref. 2). These steroids are therefore considered obsolete
today and haveat least in Europedisappeared from the market.
However, many physicians not familiar with the field retain a
long-lasting, negative impression of these steroids, believing that
testosterone may disturb liver function, although this in fact only
applies to those obsolete androgens.
Furthermore, some of the synthetic androgens cannot be converted to
5
-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) or to estrogens, as testosterone can be,
and therefore they cannot develop the full spectrum of testosterone
activities, including effects on the brain and on bones. For the same
reason, DHT, which is commercially available as a gel to be applied to
the trunk skin, is not suitable for substitution, at least not on a
long-term basis, as it cannot be converted to testosterone or
estrogen.
Hence it appears that testosterone, as produced by the testis, is the best androgen for substitution and for substitution in senescent hypogonadal men. The next therapeutic consideration then focuses on selection of the testosterone preparation most suited for senescent hypogonadal men.
| Therapeutic goal |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Choice of testoserone preparation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subdermal testosterone implants produce a similar pattern, but the profile of high initial peaks and decline thereafter extends over a much longer period of up to 6 months. Because of the longer timespan, the patient hardly recognizes the slow swings of serum testosterone.
Testosterone undecanoate administered orally produces short-lived peaks of a few hours duration, so that three doses have to be taken daily to administer enough testosterone for substitution, resulting in an irregular serum testosterone pattern during the course of the day.
Finally, transdermal testosterone has recently become available. Testosterone is administered either through scrotal or nongenital skin. Both systems produce serum testosterone profiles in the lower to medium normal range, mimicking the physiological diurnal variations of testosterone. Due to the necessity of using enhancers to facilitate absorption through the skin, nongenital systems cause a higher rate of skin reactions, but some patients consider it inconvenient to shave the scrotum occasionally to assure adhesion of the transcrotal patch. Hence, while the pharmacokinetic profile fulfills the consensus goal, the mode of application may prevent some patients from reaping the benefit.
| Evaluation of effects and side-effects |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sufficient substitution maintains or normalizes bone density, which should therefore be monitored before treatment and at least biannually thereafter. Transdermal testosterone appears to be equally as effective as testosterone enanthate (7).
The most important absolute contraindication against testosterone treatment is a prostate carcinoma. While the incidence of subclinical prostate carcinoma is high in older men, it is unclear whether testosterone treatment will stimulate progression of a subclinical carcinoma, and there are no data indicating that testosterone treatment will activate a subclinical carcinoma (8). Because of the incidence of prostate carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia increasing with age, patients should be examined carefully before onset of testosterone therapy, and those over 45 yr of age receiving testosterone treatment should be monitored at least yearly. Rectal palpation and serum PSA are the standard procedures to perform at these check-ups. Increasing experience will show whether the blind finger palpating only part of the surface of this organ can be assisted for diagnostic acccuracy by transrectal ultrasonography. In addition to this valuable tool, undergoing continuous improvement, we use uroflow as a functional parameter for the routine evaluation of the prostate in patients undergoing testosterone substitution.
It is reassuring that a recent study on long-term testosterone enanthate treatment of men around 70 yr found a lower rate of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) in the treatment group than in the control group over a 2-yr observation period (5). Because transcrotal testosterone produces somewhat higher serum DHT levels, it was speculated that it might induce a higher rate of BPH. However, in a crossectional study (9) and in our follow-up for up to 11 years (E. Nieschlag, unpublished data), prostate volumes and uroflow were no different in controls or in men treated with testosterone enanthate. Similarly, patients under nongenital transdermal testosterone substitution did not show higher prostate volumes than patients given testosterone enanthate (10). Because older men generally do not take advantage of regular check-ups for prostate disease, those on testosterone may benefit from regular monitoring, as a spontaneously developing prostate carcinoma is more likely to be discovered and treated early in these patients. In all events, discovery of a prostate carcinoma requires immediate cessation of testosterone substitution. If substitution is performed by long-acting esters or implants, such immediate withdrawal is not possible and, depending on the kinetics of the preparations used, disappearance of testosterone has to be awaited. In contrast, transdermal systems have the advantage that they can be removed immediately, and testosterone levels drop within minutes.
| Key messages |
|---|
|
|
|---|
one would preferentially use transdermal testosterone for substitution therapy in older hypogonadal men. Oral testosterone undecanoate and intramuscular testosterone enanthate or cypionate would be second choices, whereas testosterone implants would appear unsuitable. While this is the physicians rational ranking, the actual selection may be influenced by the patients preference and life-style.
| Outlook |
|---|
|
|
|---|
New insights into the molecular mechanisms of androgen action may
lead to the development of steroids suited for specific purposes.
7
-methyl-19-nortestosterone may be an example, as it is experiencing
renewed interest because of its high androgenicity combined with low
prostatotropic effects shown in animal experiments (14). Whether such
steroids will become useful and safe for clinical application in
senescence remains to be seen.
Some experts advocate the use of estrogens in male senescence, in particular because of anticipated positive cardiovascular effects. However, estrogens would cover only one of the three metabolic facets of testosterone action and, according to the above principles, would not be suitable for substitution in male hypogonadism.
Finally, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), when administered to patients with low adrenal and gonadal steroids, may function as a precursor for sex steroids including testosterone (15). However, the advantage of using a precursor instead of real testosterone in the treatment of male hypogonadism remains to be established.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-methyl-19-nortestosterone
after intramuscular administration in healthy men. Hum Reprod. 12:967973.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Schubert, T. Minnemann, D. Hubler, D. Rouskova, A. Christoph, M. Oettel, M. Ernst, U. Mellinger, W. Krone, and F. Jockenhovel Intramuscular Testosterone Undecanoate: Pharmacokinetic Aspects of a Novel Testosterone Formulation during Long-Term Treatment of Men with Hypogonadism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5429 - 5434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Nieschlag, H.M. Behre, P. Bouchard, J.J. Corrales, T.H. Jones, G.K. Stalla, S.M. Webb, and F.C.W. Wu Testosterone replacement therapy: current trends and future directions Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2004; 10(5): 409 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Rhoden and A. Morgentaler Risks of Testosterone-Replacement Therapy and Recommendations for Monitoring N. Engl. J. Med., January 29, 2004; 350(5): 482 - 492. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. von Eckardstein and E. Nieschlag Treatment of Male Hypogonadism With Testosterone Undecanoate Injected at Extended Intervals of 12 Weeks: A Phase II Study J Androl, May 1, 2002; 23(3): 419 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |