help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhasin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bhasin, S.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 10 3445-3448
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


Special Articles

VIII. Conclusion—Research Design Issues in Examining the Effects of Testosterone Supplementation in Older Men

Shalender Bhasin

Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science and University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 Uncertainty over efficacy...
 Methods for body composition...
 Assessment of muscle function
 Other outcomes
 Subject selection
 The dose issues
 Study duration
 Mechanisms of testosterone...
 References
 
Los Angeles, California 90059

THERE IS agreement that testosterone has anabolic effects under specific experimental paradigms. For instance, androgens promote nitrogen accretion in castrated males of many species, women, and boys before puberty (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Testosterone supplementation has been shown by a variety of methods, including dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, underwater weighing, magnetic resonance imaging, deuterium water dilution method, and measurements of creatinine excretion, to augment lean body mass in healthy, hypogonadal men (13, 14, 15, 16). Superphysiological doses of testosterone, when administered to eugonadal men, further increase fat-free mass, muscle size, and strength (17, 18, 19, 20, 21). However, the important issue that remains unanswered is whether physiologic testosterone replacement can produce clinically meaningful improvements in muscle function without significant adverse consequences in frail, older men (22, 23, 24, 25). Only a handful of older men have been treated with testosterone under rigorous experimental conditions. Also, there are some inherent difficulties and limitations in the design and conduct of androgen studies in older men that have confounded interpretation of data in this field (6).


    Uncertainty over efficacy criteria
 Top
 Introduction
 Uncertainty over efficacy...
 Methods for body composition...
 Assessment of muscle function
 Other outcomes
 Subject selection
 The dose issues
 Study duration
 Mechanisms of testosterone...
 References
 
Several short-term studies have demonstrated that replacement doses of testosterone increase fat-free mass in older men with relatively low testosterone levels. However, the magnitude of the increase in older men has been small. For instance, Sih et al. (23) did not find any significant change in fat-free mass by bioelectrical impedance. Tenover (24) reported a mean increase of 1.9 kg in fat-free mass measured by under water weighing. The reasons for the differences between the results of these two studies are not entirely clear, although the sample size of both studies was small, making them susceptible to both type 1 and type 2 errors. We do not know if this increase in fat-free mass is clinically meaningful. In fact, there is considerable debate over what magnitude of change in fat-free mass after testosterone treatment should be considered evidence of efficacy. The AIDS Clinical Trial Group Expert Panel has recommended that, in HIV-infected men, a 1.5 kg increase in fat-free mass, especially if associated with significant improvement in muscle function, may be considered evidence of drug efficacy.


    Methods for body composition analysis
 Top
 Introduction
 Uncertainty over efficacy...
 Methods for body composition...
 Assessment of muscle function
 Other outcomes
 Subject selection
 The dose issues
 Study duration
 Mechanisms of testosterone...
 References
 
Different investigators have used different methods for body composition analysis. These methods do not necessarily measure the same body compartment. Each method uses different algorithms and assumptions for estimation of fat-free mass (26). Methodolgical differences may account for some of the inconsistencies in the reported changes in body composition during testosterone replacement in older men. Many of these methods for body composition analysis are susceptible to changes in body water. There is concern that testosterone and other anabolic agents might produce apparent changes in body composition because of salt and water retention. Therefore, measurements of total body and extracellular water, although difficult, are particularly important in these studies.


    Assessment of muscle function
 Top
 Introduction
 Uncertainty over efficacy...
 Methods for body composition...
 Assessment of muscle function
 Other outcomes
 Subject selection
 The dose issues
 Study duration
 Mechanisms of testosterone...
 References
 
Some studies in older hypogonadal men have demonstrated modest increases in muscle strength (22, 23). However, most of these studies used grip strength as a measure of muscle function (22, 23). Grip strength is a highly effort-dependent measure of muscle strength and is not an optimum marker of frailty in older men. Weakness of the quadriceps and triceps surae muscle groups contributes to impairments of gait speed, balance, stair climbing, and rising from a seated position in the elderly. Therefore, the functional tests should require significant contributions from muscle groups that are most affected in age-related functional deficits (27).

Most of the androgen studies in older men have focused entirely on muscle strength. While strength is an important aspect of muscle function, it is not the only or the most important determinant of muscle function. Muscle power, defined as the rate of force development, at least in the lower extremity is strongly related to performance of functional activities in the elderly such as rising from chair, climbing stairs, and for speed in walking. The sarcopenia that accompanies the aging process is due in large part to the loss of the fast twitch, type II fibers and the coincident decrease in explosive force production. Power in the lower extremity can be assessed by using a leg extensor power "rig," which has been validated and used safely in people over 90 yr of age.

Muscle fatigability, the capacity to continue exerting muscular effort while delaying the onset of fatigue, does not deteriorate as rapidly as strength in sarcopenia; however, higher rates of fatigability affect a person’s ability to persist in common every day activities such as walking and stair climbing.

It is also important to correlate changes in muscle strength and power to functional performance (27). Procedures for several lower extremity functions have been standardized including stair climbing, the sit to stand transitions, and walking speed and stride length. However, there is a pressing need for the development of more sensitive measures of task performance.

All tests of muscle strength, power, and performance are dependent to some degree upon subject’s motivation and are susceptible to volitional factors. Therefore, if testosterone affects motivation, the men receiving testosterone might perform better in these effort-dependent tests of muscle function. We need clinically useful, standardized methods for the assessment of effort-independent muscle performance.

The prevailing opinion in the sports literature is that androgenic steroids do not increase exercise endurance (28, 29, 30, 31). In most studies, measures of aerobic performance did not improve. All involved orally active drugs in low doses. Serum drug levels were not monitored. Treatment duration was 6 weeks or less in all but two studies. The sample size was small, leaving open the possibility that these studies did not have sufficient power. The outcome measures were maximal tests, and in most cases the exercise modalities were highly motivation- and strategy-dependent (e.g. step tests, swimming time). This issue needs further examination using an improved experimental design and effort—independent measures of aerobic performance.


    Other outcomes
 Top
 Introduction
 Uncertainty over efficacy...
 Methods for body composition...
 Assessment of muscle function
 Other outcomes
 Subject selection
 The dose issues
 Study duration
 Mechanisms of testosterone...
 References
 
The health-related quality-of-life instruments are being increasingly used in clinical trials to assess the impact of interventions. However, the existing instruments are relatively insensitive and are able to detect only large changes. There is a paucity of reliable, precise, and sensitive instruments that can measure mood, energy, sense of well being, and the impact of interventions on the utilization of health care resources.


    Subject selection
 Top
 Introduction
 Uncertainty over efficacy...
 Methods for body composition...
 Assessment of muscle function
 Other outcomes
 Subject selection
 The dose issues
 Study duration
 Mechanisms of testosterone...
 References
 
The published and ongoing studies of androgen replacement have preferentially recruited healthy, older men with low testosterone levels (22, 23, 24, 25). The subset of older men that needs these anabolic interventions the most, namely the frail elderly, and the "oldest-old," have not been studied. We do not know whether the conclusions drawn from studies in healthy, older men will be uniformly applicable to frail, chronically ill patients. Most of the published studies have included older men of a relatively narrow age-range. There is also a need for longitudinal and intervention studies in older men of a variety of ages (27), with and without significant functional impairments.


    The dose issues
 Top
 Introduction
 Uncertainty over efficacy...
 Methods for body composition...
 Assessment of muscle function
 Other outcomes
 Subject selection
 The dose issues
 Study duration
 Mechanisms of testosterone...
 References
 
All the ongoing clinical trials have used a fixed dose of testosterone. If these ongoing trials demonstrate an augmentation of lean body mass by replacement doses of testosterone, the question of what is an optimum replacement dose of testosterone will still not be answered. On the other hand, if these studies fail to demonstrate significant increases in lean body mass, it would remain unclear if the failure to demonstrate significant effects resulted from inadequate dose of testosterone or from the inclusion of men with low normal testosterone levels. It could be argued that older men with lower testosterone levels in the hypogondal range might have benefited. Studies to determine the testosterone dose-dependency of various androgen-dependent physiological processes are highly desirable (32, 33).


    Study duration
 Top
 Introduction
 Uncertainty over efficacy...
 Methods for body composition...
 Assessment of muscle function
 Other outcomes
 Subject selection
 The dose issues
 Study duration
 Mechanisms of testosterone...
 References
 
Most of the studies of androgen replacement in older men have been of short duration (22, 24, 25). The longest study administered testosterone for 1 yr (23). Several long-term studies are currently in progress; however, at present we do not know whether testosterone’s anabolic effects in older men can be sustained over long periods without side effects. It is also not clear whether the anabolic effects persist after discontinuation of testosterone administration.


    Mechanisms of testosterone-induced muscle hypertrophy
 Top
 Introduction
 Uncertainty over efficacy...
 Methods for body composition...
 Assessment of muscle function
 Other outcomes
 Subject selection
 The dose issues
 Study duration
 Mechanisms of testosterone...
 References
 
The biochemical processes that mediate testosterone’s anabolic effects on the muscle are not well understood. Although the prevailing dogma is that androgens produce muscle hypertrophy, the possibility that testosterone- induced increase in muscle size might be due in part to muscle hyperplasia, has not been fully excluded. There is agreement that testosterone selectively stimulates fractional muscle protein synthesis rates (13:20). However, most of the studies of protein dynamics have been performed under fasting conditions; it is possible that the magnitude of the observed changes might be different under fed state. Urban et al. (20) have proposed that the increase in muscle protein synthesis is brought about by stimulation of the muscle IGF-1 and a downregulation of its binding protein IGFBP-4. Androgen receptors in the muscle are similar to those in other tissues; however, it is not clear whether the anabolic effects of supraphysiologic doses of androgenic-steroids are mediated through an androgen-receptor pathway. The speculation that pharmacologic doses of androgens may act through an androgen receptor-independent mechanism, perhaps through an anti-glucocorticoid effect, remains to be tested. The receptor binding studies predict that maximal effects of testosterone should be manifest at levels that correspond to the lower end of the normal male range (34, 35, 36). Therefore, it is possible that the anabolic effects of supraphysiologic doses might be mediated through androgen-receptor independent mechanisms; the possibility that at high doses testosterone might act through nonclassical receptors has not been excluded. The precise molecular mechanisms that mediate age-related sarcopenia or androgen-induced muscle hypertrophy are not known. Testosterone-induced muscle genes that mediate muscle hypertrophy might have therapeutic applications in sarcopenic states.

Data from experimental animals (37, 38) suggest that testosterone may modulate neuromuscular transmission; this issue has not been examined in humans.

We do not know if the anabolic effects of testosterone require its conversion to dihydrotestosterone by 5-alpha-reductase. Although there is a small amount of 5-alpha-reducatase activity within the muscle, 5-alpha reduction does not appear to be obligatory for mediating androgen effects on the muscle. For instance, patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy who have been treated with the 5- alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride do not experience muscle wasting. Similarly, patients with congenital deficiency of 5-alpha reductase enzyme have normal muscle mass. There has been some recent interest in exploring the anabolic effects of dihydrotestosterone in older men. Because this androgen cannot be aromatized, there is concern that administration of exogenous dihydrotestosterone may produce osteopenia because of suppression of endogenous testosterone, the precursor for estrogen in men.

Testosterone’s effects on the muscle may be modulated by genetic factors, GH secretory status, nutritional intake, exercise, and myostatin levels (39). The interactions of these muscle growth regulators have not been studied.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 Uncertainty over efficacy...
 Methods for body composition...
 Assessment of muscle function
 Other outcomes
 Subject selection
 The dose issues
 Study duration
 Mechanisms of testosterone...
 References
 

  1. Wilson JD. 1988 Androgen abuse by athletes. Endocr Rev. 9:181–200.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Mooradian AD, Morley JE, Korenman SG. 1987 Biological actions of androgens. Endocr Rev. 8:1–28.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Bardin CW. 1996 The anabolic action of testosterone. N Engl J Med. 335:52–53.[Free Full Text]
  4. Elashoff JD, Jacknow AD, Shain SG, Braunstein GD. 1991 Effects of anabolic/androgenic steroids on muscle strength. Ann Intern Med. 115:387–393.
  5. Bhasin S, Bremner WJ. 1997 Emerging issues in androgen replacement therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:3–8.[Free Full Text]
  6. Bhasin S, Tenover JS. 1997 Sarcopenia: Issues in testosterone replacement of older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:1659–1660.[Free Full Text]
  7. Kenyon AT, Knowlton K, Sandiford I, Kock FC, Lotwin G. 1940 A comparative study of the metabolic effects of testosterone propionate in normal men and women and in eunuchoidism. Endocrinology. 26:26–45.
  8. Kochakian CD. 1950 Comparison of protein anabolic properties of various androgens in the castrated rat. Am J Physiol. 60:553–558.
  9. Mauras N, Haymond MW, Darmaun D, Vieira NE, Abrams SA, Yergey AL. 1994 Calcium and protein kinetics in pre-pubertal boys. J Clin Invest. 93:1014–1019.
  10. Arslanian S, Suprasongsin C. 1997 Testosterone treatment in adolescents with delayed puberty: changes in body composition, protein, fat and glucose metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:2313–3220.
  11. Soliman AT, Khadir MM, Asfour M. 1995 Testosterone treatment in adolescent boys with constitutional delay of growth and development. Metabolism. 44:1013–1016.[Medline]
  12. Gregory JW, Greene SA, Thompson J, Scrimgeour CM, Rennie MJ. 1992 Effects of oral testosterone undecanoate on growth, body composition, strength, and energy expenditure of adolescent boys. Clin Endocrinol (Oxford) 37:207–213.
  13. Brodsky IG, Balagopal P, Nair KS. 1996 Effects of testosterone replacement on muscle mass and muscle protein synthesis in hypogonadal men-a Clinical Research Center Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3469–3475.[Abstract]
  14. Katznelson L, Finkelstein JS, Schoenfeld DA, Rosenthal DI, Anderson EJ, Klibanski A. 1996 Increase in bone density and lean body mass during testosterone administration in men with acquired hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:4358–4365.[Abstract]
  15. Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, Yarasheski K, Phillips J, Clevenger B, Lee WP, Casaburi R. 1997 A replacement dose of testosterone increases fat-free mass and muscle size in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:407–413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wang C, Eyre DR, Clark R, et al. 1996 Sublingual testosterone replacement improves muscle mass and strength, decreases bone resorption, and increases bone resorption markers in hypogonadal men-a Clinical Research Center Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3654–3662.[Abstract]
  17. Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, et al. 1996 The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in men. N Engl J Med. 335:1–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Forbes GB, Porta CR, Herr B, Griggs RC. 1992 Sequence of changes in body composition induced by testosterone and reversal of changes after the drug is stopped. JAMA. 267:397–399.[Abstract]
  19. Griggs RC, Kingston W, Josefowicz RF, Herr BE, Forbes G, Halliday D. 1989 Effect of testosterone on muscle mass and muscle protein synthesis. J Appl Physiol. 66:498–503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Urban RJ, Bodenburg YH, Gilkison C, et al. 1995 Testosterone administration to elderly men increases skeletal muscle strength and protein synthesis. Am J Physiol 269:E820–E826.
  21. Young NR, Baker HWG, Liu G, Seeman E. 1993 Body composition and muscle strength in healthy men receiving testosterone enanthate for contraception. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:1028–1032.[Abstract]
  22. Morley JE, Perry III HM, Kaiser FE, et al. 1993 Effects of testosterone replacement therapy in old hypogonadal males: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 41:149–152.[Medline]
  23. Sih R, Morley JE, Kaiser FE, Perry HM, Patrick P, Ross C. 1997 Testosterone replacement in older hypogonadal men: a 12-month randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:1661–1667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Tenover JS. 1992 Effects of testosterone supplementation in the aging male. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 75:1092–1098.[Abstract]
  25. Janowsky JS, Oviatt SK, Orwoll ES. 1994 Testosterone influences spatial cognition in older men. Behav Neurosci. 108:625–632.
  26. Heymsfield SB, Gallagher D, Visser M, Nunez C, Wang Z-M. 1995 Measurement of skeletal muscle: laboratory and epidemiological methods. J Gerontol. 50A:23–29.
  27. Dutta C, Hadley EC. 1995 The significance of sarcopenia in old age. J Gerontol. 50A:1–4.
  28. O’Shea JP, Winkler W. 1970 Biochemical and physical effects of an anabolic steroid in competitive swimmers and weightlifters. Nutr Rep Int. 2:351–355.
  29. Loughton SJ, Ruhling RO. 1977 Human strength and endurance responses to anabolic steroid and training. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 17:285–296.[Medline]
  30. Fahey TD, Brown CH. 1973 The effects of an anabolic steroid on the strength, body composition, and endurance of college males when accompanied by a weight training program. Med Sci Sports Exer. 5:272–277.
  31. Casaburi R, Storer T, Bhasin S. 1996 Androgen effects on body composition and muscle performance. In: Bhasin S, Gabelnick H, Spieler JM, Swerdloff RS, Wang C, eds. Pharmacology, Biology, and Clinical Applications of Androgens: Current Status and Future Prospects. New York: Wiley-Liss; pp 283–288.
  32. Forbes GB. 1985 The effect of anabolic steroids on lean body mass: the dose response curve. Metabolism. 34:571–573.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Byerley LO, Lee WNP, Swerdloff RS, et al. 1993 Effect of modulating serum testosterone levels in normal male range on protein, glucose, and lipid metabolism in men: implications for testosterone replacement therapy. Endocr J. 1:253–262.
  34. Michel G, Bauheu EE. 1980 Androgen receptor in skeletal muscle: characterization and physiologic variations. Endocrinology. 107:2088.[Abstract]
  35. Mayer M, Rosen F. 1975 Interaction of anabolic steroids with glucocorticoid receptor sites in rat muscle cytosol. Am J Physiol. 229:1381–1386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Dahlberg E, Snochowski M, Gustaffsson JA. 1981 Regulation of the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors in the rat and mouse muscle cytosol. Endocrinology. 108:1431–1436.[Abstract]
  37. Blanco CE, Popper P, Micevych P. 1997 Anabolic-androgenic steroid induced alterations in choline acetyltransferase messenger RNA levels of spinal cord motoneurons in the male rat. Neuroscience. 78:973–982.
  38. Leslie M, Forger NG, Breedlove SM. 1991 Sexual dimorphism and androgen effects on spinal motoneurons innervating the rat felxor digitorum brevis. Brain Res. 561:269–273.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Fryburg DA, Weltmen A, Jahn LA, et al. 1997 Short-term modulation of the androgen milieu alters pulsatile, but not exercise- or growth hormone (GH-releasing hormone stimulated GH secretion in healthy men: impact of gonadal steroid and GH secretory changes on metabolic outcomes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:3710–3719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhasin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bhasin, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals