| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Special Articles |
Institut Gustave-Roussy 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France Ian D. Hay Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Radioactive iodine ablation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each of these theoretical benefits should be carefully examined.
| Does RAI ablation decrease the recurrence and death rates? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RAI ablation is clearly not beneficial to patients with small intrathyroid tumors (<11.5 cm) (3, 4) and does not influence recurrence rates in patients with node-positive papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (5).
In patients with larger tumors (
1.5 cm) and multifocality, tumor
extension beyond the thyroid capsule or lymph node metastases, the
beneficial effects of RAI continue to be debated (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Mazzaferris
studies showed in patients with a primary tumor at least 1.5 cm in
diameter that the recurrence rate at 30 yr was 16% in his 138
RAI-treated patients, significantly less than the 38% rate observed in
the 802 patients treated with T4 alone. Even more
remarkable were the reported mortality rates: no cancer-related death
was observed in RAI-treated patients, significantly less than the 8%
rate seen after 30 yr in the patients who did not receive such
treatment (4). However, these favorable results were not confirmed in
an analysis performed in an identical fashion on a series of 1542
patients with similar disease stages treated at the Mayo Clinic (2). At
30 yr, recurrence rates were comparable in the RAI group (16.6%) and
in the no-RAI group (19.1%) (P = 0.89); the death
rates, which were respectively 5.9% and 7.8%, were also similar
(P = 0.43). Differences between these series may be
related to the extent and completeness of surgical excision. This is
suggested by the considerably lower 30-yr recurrence rate in the no-RAI
group at the Mayo Clinic than those reported by other institutions.
Other data support this conclusion. In patients with microscopic
residual papillary or follicular carcinoma treated in 13 Canadian
hospitals, local disease was controlled significantly more often, and
survival at 20 years was better in patients treated postoperatively
with either RAI ablation or external radiotherapy or both together than
those treated with thyroid hormone alone (P < 0.001).
In contrast, RAI ablation in patients without obvious residual disease
did not significantly increase survival (9). Earlier studies at the
Institut Gustave-Roussy (Villejuif, France) had led to the same
conclusion (10).
| Is Tg measurement and 131I-TBS improved after RAI ablation? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the other hand, 131I-TBS is more sensitive after RAI ablation of normal thyroid remnants, because thyroid remnants with a high uptake may preclude the visualization of neoplastic foci in which the uptake is lower.
| Is post-ablation 131I-TBS worthwhile? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As compared to diagnostic 131I-TBS, post-therapy 131I scans may detect new lesions in up to 50% of patients, with a significant proportion of the newly found lesions being distant metastases (12). During follow-up, in 80% of DTC patients with a detectable Tg level but no other evidence of disease, including a negative 131I-TBS with a 25 mCi dose, a TBS performed with 100 mCi revealed neoplastic uptake in the neck or at distant sites (13, 14, 15).
These data clearly show that a TBS should be performed whenever a large amount of 131I is administered. Post-ablation 131I-TBS may reveal useful information, provided an adequate apparatus is used: it can demonstrate the completeness of surgical excision and may show foci of uptake outside the thyroid bed, in lymph node areas, or at distant sites. These findings may prompt further treatment and could have an impact on the ultimate outcome. Of interest, in high risk-patients after (near) total thyroidectomy, post-ablation 131I-TBS results were closely related to Tg levels on the day of 131I administration (16).
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In patients with a thyroid carcinoma of less than 1.0 to 1.5 cm in diameter, who represent one fifth to one third of all thyroid cancer patients, the prognosis is so favorable after surgery alone that other therapeutic procedures appear superfluous. Routine RAI ablation is clearly not indicated.
In patients with primary tumors exceeding 1.01.5 cm in diameter, the benefits of RAI ablation in terms of recurrence and survival rates are still controversial after what appears to be complete surgical excision. In low risk patients, the prognosis is so favorable after surgery alone that 131I is not indicated. RAI ablation should be restricted to patients with poor prognostic indicators for relapse or death who represent only a small minority of DTC patients. Remnant ablation permits a highly sensitive 131I-TBS to be performed, and relapses are readily detected at an earlier stage during follow-up.
At present, the benefits of RAI ablation in terms of recurrence and survival can only be demonstrated in patients with known or suspected residual neoplastic disease. These patients are selected for RAI ablation on the basis of well-established prognostic indicators that take into account both the initial extent of the disease and the surgeons and pathologists reports. With time, the number of these patients will decrease, as lesions are diagnosed earlier and as surgeons become more experienced with this type of procedure. If not given post-operatively, 131I ablation therapy may be given some months later, in those with persistent elevated Tg levels.
| Is follow-up diagnostic radioiodine scanning worthwhile? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In many patients with papillary of follicular cancer a 131I total body scan (TBS) with 25 mCi is performed within a year of initial treatment, either to check the completeness of RAI ablation or to visualize the thyroid remnants in patients who have not undergone RAI ablation. Furthermore, with the withdrawal of thyroxine, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) can be measured under the most sensitive conditions. However, the necessity for 131I-TBS in such circumstances is not established for at least two reasons: first, almost all patients who have undergone (near) total thyroidectomy are totally ablated; second, a 131I-TBS performed with 25 mCi has a much lower sensitivity for the detection of disease than that performed after ablation, with a much larger dose. In fact, in 200 patients followed at Institut Gustave-Roussy, from 1994 to 1996, such a TBS did not detect any unknown disease.
Subsequent follow-up should be based on patient and tumor-related risk factors, the clinical examination, ultrasonography of the neck, and the serum Tg level measured both while on T4 treatment and after its withdrawal. There is an excellent correlation between the serum Tg level and the clinical status of patients without interfering auto-antibodies. However, it should be recognized that serum Tg is undetectable during T4 treatment in about 20% of patients with isolated lymph node metastases in the neck, in about 5% of patients with lung metastases not visible on standard chest X-rays, and in less than 1% of patients with large distant metastases. Tg will increase to a high level in the majority of these patients, following T4 withdrawal (11, 25). This has prompted several authors to advocate periodic T4 withdrawal with Tg measurement and eventually a diagnostic 131I-TBS. In reality, these patient categories are not frequently encountered: recurrent lymph node metastases occur in 1015% of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma and are frequently detected by clinical or ultrasonographic examination of the neck, while distant metastases occur during follow-up in less than 510% of patients. Most patients at risk of developing a relapse can be identified at the time of initial treatment simply by using prognostic factors and scoring systems (2, 25). Finally, most patients likely to relapse already have a detectable Tg level off T4 treatment at the time of the first diagnostic 131I-TBS.
Consequently, low-risk patients with no evidence of recurrence, and with an undetectable serum Tg level off T4 treatment at the time of initial diagnostic 131I-TBS, do not require any imaging procedure during subsequent follow-up. At Institut Gustave-Roussy, none of these patients developed a clinical recurrence with a follow-up of 20 years.
By contrast, high-risk patients with clinical or biochemical parameters suggestive of recurrence may require multiple imaging procedures, starting with a 131I-TBS. As the sensitivity of 131I-TBS is higher with a high amount of 131I, consideration should be given to administration of a high dose of 131I (100 mCi) in those patients with a Tg level either detectable during T4 treatment or above 10 ng/mL following T4 withdrawal. In these patients in whom the likelihood of recurrent disease is high, diagnostic 131I-TBS should be discouraged as it will not preclude the subsequent administration of a high dose of 131I and may stun the 131I uptake by any thyroid tissue (26). If the high dose TBS is negative, it should not be repeated within a short interval of time.
In the near future, the availability of recombinant human TSH will allow the omission of T4 withdrawal during follow-up, while permitting the measurement of serum Tg in sensitive conditions (24). Also, this will allow selection of those patients with a detectable Tg level, who may benefit from 131I-TBS.
| Is 131I therapy for recurrent disease worthwhile? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In most patients with small, nonpalpable neck recurrences, repeated 131I treatments have led to complete remission, and only 16% of those patients underwent surgery for persistent uptake (28). However, recurrences that are either easily palpable or seen at ultrasonography, are best treated by a combination of 131I and surgery. The following protocol is applied at the Institut Gustave-Roussy: 47 days after a large dose of 131I (100 mCi), a highly sensitive TBS is performed; then surgery is undertaken. Its extent is guided by the TBS and with the help of an intraoperative probe; a post-surgical TBS, performed using residual 131I activity, will then control for the completeness of surgical excision. This has led to cure in 92% of these patients (29).
131I therapy can achieve a complete remission in a third of patients with distant metastases. 131I therapy is given after T4 withdrawal every 36 months until the complete disappearance of 131I uptake on post-therapy 131I-TBS. Diagnostic 131I scanning is of limited utility before planned therapy and, moreover, may stun the 131I uptake by the neoplastic foci. Standard treatment doses range between 100 and 200 mCi. Significant prognostic indicators for complete remission include a young patient age, positive 131I uptake, and small metastases. In patients with lung metastases, a complete remission was observed in 83% of lesions that were not visible on chest X-rays, in 53% of micronodular (<1 cm) and in only 14% of macronodular (>1 cm) metastases (27). Bone metastases are usually large when discovered, and only a few responses have been obtained after 131I treatment.
In patients without 131I uptake on the first high-dose 131I-TBS, further 131I treatments are pointless.
In conclusion, 131I therapy is mostly effective in patients with small foci of recurrent disease. This underlines the prognostic significance of early detection, which is facilitated by an appropriate initial treatment and follow-up strategy, mainly based on knowledge of initial prognostic factors and periodic serum Tg measurement.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted June 8, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. L. Mazzaferri and R. T. Kloos Current Approaches to Primary Therapy for Papillary and Follicular Thyroid Cancer J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 1447 - 1463. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |