| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Departments of Clinical Biochemistry (M.A.LL., M.L.G., A.C.), Endocrinology (G.C., A.S.), Eating Disorders Unit (X.F., M.F.), Psychiatry (L.S.-P.), and General Surgery (A.A., M.R.), Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. M. Foz, Servei de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, C/Canyet s.n, Badalona 08916, Spain.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To avoid the sexual dimorphism in leptin values, we performed leptin standardization according to gender (SD score-leptin). The relationship between SD score-leptin and GHBP was studied in 128 adults with different nutritional status [8 groups according to body mass index (BMI)], ranging from severely underweight anorexia nervosa to highly morbid obesity.
Both GHBP and SD score-leptin significantly increased according to BMI within the range from 1827 kg/m2, whereas no significant differences were found among underweight groups (BMI, <18 kg/m2) or among obesity grades (BMI, >27 kg/m2).
We found a strong correlation between GHBP and SD score-leptin (r = 0.8; P < 0.0001). Multiple regression analysis revealed SD score-leptin to be a significant determinant of GHBP, accounting for 64% of the variation, whereas BMI did not contribute further to explaining changes in GHBP. This suggests a physiological pathway involving both GHBP (the soluble fraction of GH receptor) and leptin. Thus, we might speculate that leptin could be the signal that induces the related nutritional changes observed in GHBP/GH receptor expression.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During adult life, serum GHBP levels remain relatively constant, but vary widely from individual to individual, related basically to their nourishment status. Thus, undernutrition situations such as anorexia nervosa are associated with elevated GH secretion and low GHBP activity and suggest GH resistance (4, 5, 6), whereas obesity is accompanied by low GH secretion and elevated GHBP levels (6, 7, 8, 9). Moreover, a direct relationship between body mass index (BMI) and GHBP activity has consistently been reported, even among normal weight subjects (10, 11). However, the mechanism underlying the strong link among nutritional status, GH secretion, and GHBP remains unknown.
Leptin, the protein of the adipocyte-specific (ob) gene produced in adipose tissue, has been implicated in the regulation of appetite and whole body energy balance (12, 13). In humans, a strong relationship between serum leptin levels and measurements of body fatness has been demonstrated (14, 15, 16, 17). Recent evidence suggests that leptin plays a role in GH secretion regulation and might be the signal connecting the GH axis with adipose tissue in rats (18). To date, only four studies analyzing the relationship between leptin and GHBP have been conducted in humans: normal weight adults (19), depressed adult patients (20), prepubertal children (21), and obese pubertal children and adolescents (22). The purpose of this paper was to study the connection between GHBP and leptin in adults with a wide range of BMI to ascertain whether serum leptin levels might be a factor linking nutrition with serum GHBP activity.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
14.5 kg/m2)
consisted of 7 patients who were severely underweight, group II (BMI,
>14.5 kg/m2 and <16 kg/m2) consisted of 8
underweight patients, and group III (BMI,
16 kg/m2 and
<18 kg/m2) consisted of 19 patients with partial weight
recovery. Forty-eight were normal weight (group IV; BMI,
18
kg/m2 and <27 kg/m2), and 12 were overweight
(group V; BMI,
27 kg/m2 and <30 kg/m2)
healthy adults. Thirty-four patients with long lasting obesity were
studied before entering a weight reduction program; 13 were simple
obese (group VI; BMI,
30 kg/m2 and <40
kg/m2), 11 were morbidly obese (group VII; BMI,
40
kg/m2 and <50 kg/m2), and 10 were highly
morbidly obese (group VIII; BMI,
50 kg/m2; Table 1
|
Hormone assays
Serum leptin concentrations were measured by a commercial RIA (Linco Research, St. Louis, MO). The intraassay coefficient of variations (CVs) ranged from 3.48.3%, and interassay CVs ranged from 3.66.2%. Serum GH concentrations were measured using a solid phase, two-site chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay for use with the Immulite Automated Analyzer (Immulite hGH, Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA), which uses standards calibrated against the International Standard 80/505. The assay has sensitivity of 0.05 ng/mL, with interassay CVs ranging from 5.56.5%.
GHBP measurement
GHBP activity was measured by the high performance liquid
chromatography-gel filtration method of Tar et al. (23).
Briefly, recombinant human (h) GH (Humatrope, Eli Lilly Co.,
Indianapolis, IN) was radiolabeled with [125I]Na using
the chloramine-T method modified by Lesniak et al. (24), and
purified weekly by gel filtration chromatography. Serum (100 µL) was
incubated overnight at 4 C with 100 µL potassium phosphate buffer and
0.1% BSA containing monomeric [125I]hGH (0.5 ng). A
parallel incubation was carried out in the presence of an excess of
recombinant hGH (2 µg) to evaluate nonspecific binding. The entire
incubation mixture was injected into an high performance liquid
chromatograph (model series 2, Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) with a
Protein Pack 300 sw column (Waters, Millipore, Milford, MA; 0.75
x 30 cm) to separate bound and free [125I]hGH. The
eluate was collected in 30-s fractions, and radioactivity was counted
in an automatic
-counter (GAMBYT, CR-20, Diagnostic Products Corp.).
Binding of [125I]hGH was expressed as the radioactivity
in individual peak II divided by the sum of the radioactivity in peaks
I, II, and III. Binding to peak II-BP was given as a percentage of
specific binding, calculated as the difference between total
(incubation without unlabeled hGH) and nonspecific (incubation with
excess hGH) binding. Interassay CVs were 8.4% and 9.8% at levels of
40.9% and 19.2% GHBP activity, respectively. GHBP activity was
corrected for endogenous GH interference at serum GH concentrations
above 7 ng/mL (25).
Calculations and statistical analysis
BMI was calculated dividing weight (kilograms) by height (meters)2.
All statistical analyses were made with the statistical software package SPSS, version 6.0.1 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Data were first tested for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality. Leptin concentrations were not normally distributed, so they were logarithmically transformed before analysis (log leptin).
To overcome gender differences in leptin concentrations, individual leptin values were standardized according to sex-matched leptin levels observed in the normal weight group as follows: SD score-leptin = {[log (observed leptin) - log (geometric mean)]/SD}. For men: SD score-leptin = (log observed leptin - log 3.7)/0.49; for women: SD score-leptin = (log observed leptin - log 10.4)/0.65.
One-way ANOVA was used to assess potential differences among groups followed by Scheffes F test for multiple comparisons. Bivariate correlations and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to test the relationship among GHBP, log (leptin), SD score of leptin, and BMI. All data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hormone results obtained in all groups studied are shown in Table 1
. In the normal weight group, no differences were found in GHBP
activity according to gender, but serum leptin concentrations in men
were significantly lower than those in women (P <
0.0001).
Figure 1A
shows the mean ±
SE GHBP activity in all groups studied. One-way ANOVA
revealed significantly decreased GHBP activity in the underweight
groups (groups I, II, and III) compared to the others, whereas no
differences were found among them. GHBP activity was significantly
lower in normal weight subjects (group IV) compared to obese patients
(groups VI, VII, and VIII), but did not differ from that in overweight
subjects (group V). No differences were observed in GHBP activity among
groups with BMI above 27 kg/m2 (groups V, VI, VII, and
VIII).
|
Correlation analyses
Bivariate correlation analyses showed a positive correlation
between serum GHBP activity and BMI (r = 0.71; P
< 0.0001) and between SD score-leptin and BMI (r =
0.78; P < 0.0001; Fig. 2
, A and B). Moreover, GHBP activity
correlated significantly with log leptin concentrations (r = 0.77;
P < 0.0001), but when sexual dimorphism was avoided
(SD score-leptin), a stronger correlation was found (r
= 0.8; P < 0.0001; Fig. 3
).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The relationship between body fatness and leptin concentrations is significantly influenced by gender in children and adults (14, 17, 27, 31, 32). In accordance with other studies, serum leptin levels in women in our normal weight group were almost 3-fold higher than those in men; thus, sex must be taken into account when analyzing leptin data (14, 17, 19, 27, 28, 31, 32). Previous reports have found that gender influence can be overcome by correcting leptin levels according to body fat (15, 16, 27), but others have reported that this sexual dimorphism persists after body composition and fat distribution have been adjusted (14, 17, 27, 32). To perform statistical comparisons with GHBP, which is not significantly affected by gender (23), we standardized leptin concentrations according to sex (SD score-leptin) after logarithmic transformation of leptin data. Standardization is a common procedure in age-dependent hormone parameters, but has not yet been used to express male and female leptin levels together.
To our knowledge, no studies on GHBP and leptin in individuals with such a wide range of BMI including different degrees of underweight (ranging from severe underweight to partly weight recovered) and overweight (from overweight to highly morbid obesity) have been reported. As expected, we found that GHBP activity and SD score-leptin increased according to BMI. Both GHBP and SD score-leptin were significantly higher in obese groups than in normal weight adults or anorexic patients and were significantly lower in anorexic compared with normal weight subjects (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 33). However, we found no further increase in GHBP or SD score-leptin above a BMI of 27 kg/m2 despite almost triplicate BMI. Furthermore, we found no significant decrease in either GHBP or SD score-leptin among the underweight groups (BMI, <18 kg/m2). The fact that leptin levels remained unchanged in the underweight and obese groups supports the hypothesis that leptin is not merely a ponderostat (34). If leptin only informed of the size of the adipose tissue depot, we would expect a progressive increase in its levels parallel to the degree of obesity. Recently, a number of experimental studies have suggested that the relationship between leptin and energy balance does not depend on body fatness alone, but is much more complex, as supported by the close relationship between leptin and thermogenesis (35), the influence of selective micronutrients on leptin expression, and the circadian rhythmicity of leptin levels (29, 34).
In our study, SD score-leptin and GHBP correlated significantly with BMI, in agreement with the findings of others (10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17). Moreover, a stronger correlation was found between SD score-leptin and GHBP. Multiple regression analyses revealed that changes in SD score-leptin were significant determinants of GHBP variation, whereas BMI did not contribute further to accounting for changes in GHBP. Changes in SD score-leptin explained 64% of the variation in GHBP levels. Similar results were found when the relationship between GHBP and log leptin was analyzed separately in men and women. Our results concur with those of Bjarnason et al. (21), who reported a strong correlation between serum GHBP and leptin concentrations after adjustment for BMI in a group of normal prepubertal children. In the same report, in a group of short children born small for gestational age, serum GHBP correlated with serum leptin levels, whereas correlations between GHBP and BMI, and leptin and BMI were absent. Our results are also in agreement with those reported by Kratzsch et al. (22), who found an association between serum GHBP and leptin levels in a group of obese pubertal children and adolescents, which remained significant after controlling for percent body fat. In contrast, Fisker et al. (19) and Deuschle et al. (20) found no significant correlation between GHBP and leptin when controlling for estimates of body fatness. However, in these reports the adult population studied was smaller than ours.
To date, the role of nutrition-induced alterations in GHBP levels, as well as the precise nutritional factor responsible for the GHBP/GH receptor change, remain unknown. From our findings, we speculate that leptin may be the signal linking nutrition and GHBP/receptor changes, which suggests a physiological pathway involving both GHBP and leptin. We concur with Jorgensen et al. (36), who speculated that GHBP/GH receptor levels may influence the balance or partitioning between the direct effects, those related to lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, and the insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I)-mediated effects of GH. Low leptin levels observed in undernourished states might, therefore, account for the decreased production of GHBP/receptor and IGF-I, which, through reduced negative feedback, results in increased GH production (4, 5, 6, 30, 33). Thus, in undernutrition, direct metabolic actions of GH in terms of increased lipolysis and glucose sparing are enhanced so that available nutrients may be used instead of growth for energy production and other metabolic functions (4, 30, 36). The opposite occurs in overnutrition and obesity when nutrients are plentiful and can be used largely to promote energy storage and somatic growth. In these situations increased leptin levels could induce GHBP/GH receptor expression. This may explain the normal to high IGF-I levels found in overnutrition despite blunted GH secretion (7, 30). This higher GHBP/GH receptor and IGF-I levels are consistent with the accelerated growth rate observed in well nourished children despite low GH secretion (7, 10, 30), whereas during adulthood, diminished lipolytic GH activity might contribute to perpetuating obesity (36).
Other similarities between these peptides also lead us to think that
they are closely linked. Leptin, GH, and other nutrition-related
peptides such as tumor necrosis factor-
share some biochemical and
structural analogies. These peptides are involved in the regulation of
energy expenditure and body weight (37). Moreover, their receptors
belong to the same cytokine receptor superfamily (38, 39, 40). These
receptors have been found to have soluble isoforms in addition to the
membrane-bound isoforms (40). Thus, leptin, GH, tumor necrosis factor
, and other cytokines circulate bound to specific binding proteins
that modulate the availability of free hormones for their biological
actions (2, 3, 41, 42). In this way, GHBP represents the soluble form
of the GH receptor, and recently, the presence of leptin-binding
proteins in serum, one of which appears to be the soluble leptin
receptor Ob-Re, has been demonstrated (3, 41, 42). Further studies are
required to clarify these relationships.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 14, 1997.
Revised March 5, 1998.
Accepted March 11, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
system in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:34083413.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Chan, C. J. Williams, P. Raciti, J. Blakeman, T. Kelesidis, I. Kelesidis, M. L. Johnson, M. O. Thorner, and C. S. Mantzoros Leptin Does Not Mediate Short-Term Fasting-Induced Changes in Growth Hormone Pulsatility but Increases IGF-I in Leptin Deficiency States J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2819 - 2827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Stein, E. Vasquez-Garibay, J. Kratzsch, E. Romero-Velarde, and G. Jahreis Influence of Nutritional Recovery on the Leptin Axis in Severely Malnourished Children J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 1021 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Gleeson, C. A. Lissett, and S. M. Shalet Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Response to a Single Bolus of Growth Hormone Is Increased in Obesity J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 1061 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Z. Kasa-Vubu, A. Barkan, P. Olton, T. Meckmongkol, N. E. Carlson, and C. M. Foster Incomplete Modified Fast in Obese Early Pubertal Girls Leads to an Increase in 24-Hour Growth Hormone Concentration and a Lessening of the Circadian Pattern in Leptin J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1885 - 1893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Coutant, F. Boux de Casson, S. Rouleau, O. Douay, E. Mathieu, M. Audran, and J. M. Limal Body Composition, Fasting Leptin, and Sex Steroid Administration Determine GH Sensitivity in Peripubertal Short Children J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2001; 86(12): 5805 - 5812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bondanelli, A. Margutti, M. R. Ambrosio, L. Plaino, L. Cobellis, F. Petraglia, and E. C. degli Uberti Blood Growth Hormone-Binding Protein Levels in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women: Roles of Body Weight and Estrogen Levels J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 1973 - 1980. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |