| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Immunogénétique Humaine, INSERM U-276, Institut Pasteur (C.K., L.Q.-M., S.B., N.S.-T., G.P., T.B., M.F., K.M.), Paris, France; Laboratoire dHistologie, Biologie de la Reproduction et Cytogenetique, Hôpital Tenon (J.-P.S., J.-P.D.), Paris, France; Institut Pasteur (H.R.), Casablanca, Morroco; Médecine de la Reproduction (D.D.), Paris, France; Service dUrologie (G.A.) and Service de Gynecologie Obstetrique (J.M.A.), Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Hajnal Imre Egeszsegtudomanyi Intezet (E.E.), Budapest, Hungary; Clinique de la Dhuys (J.P.T.), Paris, France; Buda Children Hospital (A.T.), Budapest, Hungary; Cytogénétique, CHU Mulhouse (E.J.), France; and CHU (G.P.), Caen, France
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Ken McElreavey, Immunogenetique Humaine, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr Roux, Paris Cedex 15, France 75724.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These observations raise several important issues. Differences in deletion frequency may be due to 1) absence of a standardized screening methodology (protocol); 2) recruitment biases between studies, as the majority of the reports describe the analysis of only males with idiopathic infertility or have excluded obstructive azoospermia; 3) they may reflect genuine population differences in the frequency of deletions, perhaps related to a combination of particular Y chromosome haplotypes, genetic background, or environmental influences; or 4) marker density or the genomic markers selected could not only influence the estimation of deletion frequency, but also may affect the interpretation of genotype/phenotype relationships. The possibility that microdeletions may be present in nonidiopathic males also raises important ethical issues regarding patient management.
Here, we examined DNA samples from 131 consecutive men presenting with infertility, associated with reduced or absent sperm counts. We report Yq microdeletions in 19% of males diagnosed as idiopathic and in 7% of males with infertility due to known causes. The position and extent of the Y deletions were not significantly different between idiopathic and nonidiopathic groups.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One hundred and thirty-one unrelated males presenting with
infertility associated with reduced or absence sperm counts were
recruited in this study. They were subjected to detailed clinical
investigations, including cytogenetic and endocrinology studies,
physical examination, and, when possible, histology of a testis biopsy.
Details of the groups of patients are summarized in Table 1
. Individuals were defined as
azoospermic or severe oligozoospermic (<5 x
106) or oligozoospermic (<20 x
106) according to the criteria of the WHO. Serum
FSH and testosterone levels were measured using RIA. Testicular volume
was evaluated using an orchidometer. Each patient was tested for the
presence of antisperm antibodies. As a control group, 50 men who had
fathered at least 2 children were included in the study.
|
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes
using standard techniques. Where sufficient DNA was available, Southern
blotting was performed on DNA to confirm the absence of Y chromosome
markers. The STS primers and the conditions of amplification were
described previously (6, 18). PCR amplifications found to be negative
were repeated at least three times to confirm the deletion of a given
marker. All investigations were performed without knowledge of the
clinical diagnosis or the karyotype. The order of the markers shown has
been previously published (10, 19, 20). All amplifications were
performed separately. The testis determining gene SRY was
used as a positive control in each case. A normal fertile male and a
female were used as positive and negative controls for each STS
amplification. PCR products were analyzed on a 2% agarose gel. The STS
primers tested on each subject were SRY, sY81, sY85, sY86,
sY87, sY88, sY95, sY114, sY116, sY125, sY127, sY131, sY145, sY147,
sY152, sY154, sY155, sY158, sY159, sY160, sY254, and sY255. Men deleted
for any of these markers were further analyzed using markers contiguous
to the deleted marker (Fig. 1
).
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The clinical findings are summarized in Table 1
. Of the 131
individuals included in this study, sperm counts revealed azoospermia
(the complete absence of spermatozoa; 63% of cases), oligozoospermia
(520 millions/mL; 30% of cases), severe oligozoospermia (<5
million/mL; 5% of cases), or asthenoteratozoospermia (abnormalities of
sperm morphology; <2% of cases). Based on the clinical findings,
nonidiopathic infertility was diagnosed in 85 cases. Of the 85 cases,
cytogenetic investigations revealed chromosome anomalies in 13 of these
cases. These included 2 SRY-positive 46,XX males, 2 men with
Klinefelters syndrome, and 2 chromosomal translocations. In 46 cases,
oligo- or azoospermia was diagnosed as idiopathic associated with an
apparently normal 46,XY chromosome complement (see Table 1
).
Microdeletions
Clinical details of males with Yq deletions are summarized in
Table 2
. The position and extent of the
deletions are shown schematically in Fig. 1
. Noncytogenetically
detectable microdeletions were detected in 14 of the 131 individuals
with an 46,XY karyotype (I1-I9, S1-S4, and M1). If individuals with a
chromosomal anomaly are excluded from the calculation, the number of
men with a microdeletion of Yq associated with idiopathic infertility
is 9 of 46 (19%), and the number with nonidiopathic infertility is 5
of 72 (7%). This latter figure excludes 13 men with cytogenetically
detectable anomalies.
|
Interstitial microdeletions of the AZFc region were found in five
individuals (3.8% of the total cases). All five deletions resulted in
the loss of all of the AZFc region including the DAZ gene cluster (I5,
I7, I8, S1, and S3). Southern blot analysis confirmed the presence of
deletions in the majority of the cases (I2, I4, I7, I8, I9, CA2, CA3,
CA4, CA6, CA7, S2, S3, and M1). Representative Southern blots are shown
in Fig. 2
, A and B.
|
Genotype/phenotype relationships
Microdeletions were observed in 19% of males diagnosed as
idiopathic and in 7% of males diagnosed as nonidiopathic associated
with an apparently 46,XY chromosome complement (see Fig. 1
). There was
no obvious difference in the position or extent of the deletions
between these two groups, with the exception of one patient diagnosed
as having idiopathic azoospermia. He had a microdeletion of three
contiguous markers in the AZFa region.
Four patients with large AZFb deletions were azoospermic (I3, I6, S4, and M1). Patient S4 is affected by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and he was repeatedly treated with gonadotropins without any success. In one patient (M1) with an AZFb microdeletion, gonadal histology was available. This individual was diagnosed as nonidiopathic, with a combination of both varicocele and dysjunction of the epididymus and testis. Gonadal histology revealed spermatogenic arrest at the spermatocyte II phase. Although this observation would appear to support the conclusions of Vogt and colleagues, that AZFb deletions are associated with spermatogenic arrest at the spermatocyte stage (3), other patients harboring partial AZFb microdeletions presented with a range of infertile phenotypes, including oligozoospermia (only sY114 deleted, I2) and severe oligozoospermia (proximal AZFb region deleted, I1, S2).
Deletions of AZFc are associated with a wide range of phenotypical features. Among the idiopathic patients, two had severe oligozoospermia (I4 and I8), and two had azoospermia (I5 and I7). Gonad histology revealed Sertoli cell only syndrome in I5 and spermatogenesis arrest during meiosis in patient I7. In the nonidiopathic group with deletion of the entire AZFc region, two patients (S1 and S3) presented in their medical history trauma of testis and orchiditis, respectively. Patient S1 had severe oligozoospermia associated with hypospermatogenesis, whereas S3 presented azoospermia associated with spermatogenesis arrest at a premeiotic stage. In the latter case the Y chromosome deletion rather than the orchiditis could be responsible for the spermatogenic arrest.
Although these data indicate that there is a considerable variation in the phenotype between men with similar Yq deletions, patients that carried deletions involving only one or a small number of markers had a less severe phenotype regardless of the position of the deletion. Patient I2 presented with oligozoospermia associated with the absence of marker sY114. Those individuals carrying larger deletions had a variable, although, in general, more severe, phenotype. It is difficult to interpret genotype/phenotype relationships in the group of patients who had cytogenetically detectable deletions of Yq (CA1-CA7), because in most cases the deletion was associated with a chromosomal mosaicism that was detected in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Large Yq deletions that include the heterochromatic region and the Yq/Xq pseudoautosomal region may be directly responsible for the mosaicism.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several genes on the Y chromosome have been proposed as candidate infertility genes. In AZFa, the DFFRY gene encodes a protein involved in desubiquitination and has been proposed to play a role in gametogenesis (25, 26). Recently, an active copy of the RBM gene family has been mapped to distal AZFb (interval 6B in the region of sY142-sY145) (27, 28). All males in the current study who carried AZFb interstitial deletions were not deleted for this region, suggesting that the active copy of RBM is not removed. Although it is possible that these microdeletions may have caused dysregulation of gene expression by a position effect, it is equally likely that these deletions result in the absence of another gene(s) necessary for normal spermatogenesis. Recently, Lahn and Page described a number of genes and gene families on the Y chromosome, including two that have been tentatively mapped to the 5L deletion interval, a region that is recurrently deleted in our group of AZFb-deleted individuals (29). These are the genes, chromodomain Y (CDY), and XK-related Y (XKRY), both of which are expressed specifically in testis.
The DAZ gene family has been proposed as candidate genes for the AZFc phenotype (6, 7, 30). However, deletions have been described within the AZFc region that do not include the DAZ gene family (8, 9, 16). In this study all of the deletions included DAZ (sY254-sY255).
Y Chromosome polymorphisms
In the majority of cases in this study, male relatives of the patients in the Yq-deleted group were unavailable for study, and hence, we do not known whether the deletions are inherited. However, the majority of the deletions are large in both the idiopathic and nonidiopathic groups and hence are unlikely to represent polymorphisms. The marker sY114 has been used by Vogt and co-workers (31) in a screen of males of known fertility failed to detect deletions of this marker. The sequence of sY114 is derived from the plasmid pYHa34, isolated by Vogt and colleagues using sequences derived from Drosophila Y chromosome sequences encoding fertility factors. Interestingly, the nuclear localization of the Drosophila DAZL1 homolog, Boule, is dependent on the presence of a single fertility factor on the short arm of the Drosophila Y chromosome. The Drosophila Y chromosome encodes six fertility loci, each spanning four or more megabases of DNA. These repetitive sequences are transcribed stage specifically in the nucleus of the primary spermatocyte as continuous long transcription units. During their transcription the ribonucleic acid accumulates specific nuclear proteins, which can be observed under light microscopy as distinct intranuclear structures (termed lampbrush structures or Y loops). The absence of the ks-1 fertility locus results in the cytoplasm localization of Boule in primary spermatocytes and does not seem to interfere with spermatid differentiation, indicating that that the role of Boule in meiotic entry is independent of its nuclear localization. As suggested by Wasserman and colleagues, the Y chromosome loops may serve as a storage for boule and other ribonucleic acid-binding proteins (32). The breakdown of the lampbrush Y chromosome loops that occurs at the end of the spermatocyte growth phase may result in the release of these factors in a synchronous fashion (32).
Mechanism of Y deletions
It has been estimated that between 5070% of the nonrecombining region of human Y chromosome is composed of a variety of highly repeated DNA elements, the majority of which appear to be unique to the human Y chromosome (33). Deletions of the Y chromosome are likely to be consequence of these repeated elements causing intrachromosomal recombination. The instability of the Y chromosome is illustrated by the transmission of a Y deletion from a fertile father to his infertile son (34). The deletion was found to be larger in the son than in the father. Evidence suggests that both genetic and environmental factors may be effective in invoking deletion formation. Edwards and Bishop (35) suggested that orchidism as the primary cause of infertility is rarely defined. Recently, Pyror and colleagues identified Yq microdeletions in four individuals classified as nonidiopathic. These were two azoospermic men with varicocele and two men with spermatic duct obstruction. However, these microdeletions could be unrelated polymorphisms, as a similar microdeletion was reported in a normal fertile male in the same study. Here, for the first time, we describe a significant percentage of large Yq deletions of the AZFb and AZFc regions associated with nonidiopathic infertility, including hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, trauma, orchitis, bilateral cryptorchidism, and epidydimal-testicular dysjunction. In males with a known cause of infertility, the possibility that Y chromosome microdeletions may also contribute to spermatogenic failure should be explored, particularly where detailed gonad histology indicates spermatogenetic arrest.
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is the technique of choice in severe male factor infertility and consists of the insertion of a single spermatozoon or spermatid into the cytoplasm of a mature oocyte (36). Concerns have been expressed that this method may allow genetic defects to be added to the gene pool (37). Although several studies have not found any evidence for an increased malformation rate among children conceived using ICSI, it is possible that the genetic anomalies causing the infertility could be transmitted to male offspring (38). ICSI is a relatively new technique, and the long term genetic effects are unknown. Our findings that Yq deletions can occur in 19% of males diagnosed with idiopathic infertility and, significantly, in 7% of nonidiopathic infertile males raise important questions concerning the screening of Y deletions and genetic counseling. Current protocols recommend that men with idiopathic severe oligozoospermia or nonobstructive azoospermia be screened for Y chromosome deletions. On the basis of our data we recommend a more extended screening program to include all men, idiopathic and nonidiopathic, seeking ICSI treatment who present with a sperm concentration of less than 5 x 106/mL.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 19, 1998.
Revised April 23, 1999.
Accepted June 4, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Hadjkacem-Loukil, I. Ayadi, A. Bahloul, H. Ayadi, and L. Ammar-Keskes Tag STS in the AZF Region Associated With Azoospermia in a Tunisian Population J Androl, September 1, 2007; 28(5): 652 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ferlin, B. Arredi, E. Speltra, C. Cazzadore, R. Selice, A. Garolla, A. Lenzi, and C. Foresta Molecular and Clinical Characterization of Y Chromosome Microdeletions in Infertile Men: A 10-Year Experience in Italy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 762 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tessari, E. Salata, A. Ferlin, L. Bartoloni, M.L. Slongo, and C. Foresta Characterization of HSFY, a novel AZFb gene on the Y chromosome with a possible role in human spermatogenesis Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 10(4): 253 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Ferlin, E Moro, A Rossi, B Dallapiccola, and C Foresta The human Y chromosome's azoospermia factor b (AZFb) region: sequence, structure, and deletion analysis in infertile men J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2003; 40(1): 18 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.M. Luetjens, J. Gromoll, M. Engelhardt, S. von Eckardstein, M. Bergmann, E. Nieschlag, and M. Simoni Manifestation of Y-chromosomal deletions in the human testis: a morphometrical and immunohistochemical evaluation Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2258 - 2266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kostova, S. Rottger, W. Schempp, and J. Gromoll Identification and characterization of the cynomolgus monkey chromodomain gene cynCDY, an orthologue of the human CDY gene family Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 8(8): 702 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Peterlin, T. Kunej, J. Sinkovec, N. Gligorievska, and B. Zorn Screening for Y chromosome microdeletions in 226 Slovenian subfertile men Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2002; 17(1): 17 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kamp, K. Huellen, S. Fernandes, M. Sousa, P.N. Schlegel, A. Mielnik, S. Kleiman, H. Yavetz, W. Krause, W. Kupker, et al. High deletion frequency of the complete AZFa sequence in men with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 7(10): 987 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Foresta, E. Moro, and A. Ferlin Prognostic value of Y deletion analysis: The role of current methods Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1543 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Krausz, E. Rajpert-De Meyts, L. Frydelund-Larsen, L. Quintana-Murci, K. McElreavey, and N. E. Skakkebaek Double-Blind Y Chromosome Microdeletion Analysis in Men with Known Sperm Parameters and Reproductive Hormone Profiles: Microdeletions Are Specific for Spermatogenic Failure J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2638 - 2642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Krausz and K. McElreavey Y chromosome microdeletions in `fertile' males Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1306 - 1306. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Foresta, E. Moro, and A. Ferlin Y Chromosome Microdeletions and Alterations of Spermatogenesis Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2001; 22(2): 226 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S.E. Kleiman, B.B.-S. Maymon, L. Yogev, G. Paz, and H. Yavetz The prognostic role of the extent of Y microdeletion on spermatogenesis and maturity of Sertoli cells Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2001; 16(3): 399 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Saut, P. Terriou, A. Navarro, N. Levy, and M. J. Mitchell The human Y chromosome genes BPY2, CDY1 and DAZ are not essential for sustained fertility Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 789 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Blagosklonova, F. Fellmann, M.-C. Clavequin, C. Roux, and J.-L. Bresson AZFa deletions in Sertoli cell-only syndrome: a retrospective study Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 795 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Krausz, L. Quintana-Murci, and K. McElreavey Prognostic value of Y deletion analysis: What is the clinical prognostic value of Y chromosome microdeletion analysis? Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1431 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |