| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Servei dEndocrinologia i Nutrició, Servei de Bioquímica (J.R.-E.), Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. R. Corcoy, Servei dEndocrinologia i Nutrició, Hospital de Sant Pau, Avda Sant Antoni Ma Claret 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Caucasian women with hypothyroidism antedating pregnancy seen in the Endocrinopathies and Pregnancy Clinic over a 4-yr period (19951998) were considered eligible if they fulfilled inclusion criteria: 1) available information about autoimmunity and 2) at least one TSH level in the target range in the year before conception (0.255 IU/L for women receiving replacement therapy and less than 0.25 IU/L for women receiving suppressive therapy). Forty-one women were included in the study. Thirty-one women (group A) were receiving replacement doses of LT because of ablative therapy for Graves disease (n = 9) or primary hypothyroidism with (n = 18) or without autoimmunity (n = 4). Autoimmunity was considered present if positivity for antithyroid antibodies (either antithyroglobulin or antithyroperoxidase) was documented, the patient had a diagnosis of Graves disease, or hypothyroidism had been detected during the first year after delivery in a previous pregnancy. In the last case, hypothyroidism was considered definitive because LT could not be withdrawn. One patient with Pendred syndrome and three patients with subtotal thyroidectomy for multinodular goiter were classified as having hypothyroidism without autoimmunity. Ten women (group B) were receiving suppressive LT therapy because of papillary/follicular thyroid carcinoma.
A control group of 31 nonpregnant Caucasian women of similar age consecutively attending the Thyroid Clinic for either autoimmune hypothyroidism (group C; n = 21) or thyroid carcinoma (group D; n = 10) with TSH values within the target range and documented follow-up for a similar period were included as controls. All patients and controls gave informed consent.
Methods
Peripheral blood for measurement of thyroid function was obtained at different intervals according to clinical needs. Free T4 (FT4) was measured in cases where TSH was below the target range or higher than 15 mU/L. Changes in LT doses were performed according to TSH and (if available) FT4 measurements.
Study subjects. In addition to prepregnancy tests, TSH was measured at 2-month intervals during pregnancy and at least twice after delivery to document that TSH was within the target range. Eighty-three percent of women had TSH monitored in the first trimester after delivery, 63.4% in the second, 46.3% in the third, and 53.7% in the fourth. Data were collected in the context of a prospective study about changes in LT requirements during pregnancy to document their transient nature. At delivery, the LT prepregnancy dose was resumed except in two patients who required big adjustments during pregnancy.
Control subjects. Information about TSH levels was collected during the usual clinical follow-up.
Assays
Serum TSH concentrations were measured using a two-site chemiluminometric immunoassay (Corning, Inc., Medfield, MA).
FT4 levels were measured using a chemiluminescent immunoassay ACS 180 Chiron Corp. (East Walpole, MA).
Definitions
Discordant LT doses. The LT requirements to achieve the therapeutic goal (replacement or suppressive therapy) are different at baseline and during follow-up.
Hyperthyroidism. The previous adequate LT dose is associated with TSH suppression (replacement therapy) or excessive FT4 (suppressive therapy).
Hypothyroidism. The previous adequate LT dose is associated with a TSH elevation out of the target range.
Recurrence of Graves disease. The previous adequate LT dose is associated with TSH suppression and high FT4. The persistence of high FT4 leads to discontinuation of LT, confirmation of high radioactive iodine uptake and the initiation of antithyroid drugs.
Statistics
The SPSS-PC(+) 7.5 for windows statistical package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used. Differences between prepregnancy
and postpartum LT doses were assessed using Wilcoxon test for paired
data.
2/Fishers exact test was used for
qualitative variables. Different logistic regression models were
constructed using discordant prepregnancy-postpartum LT doses as the
dependent variable and patient group (carcinoma vs.
noncarcinoma), prepregnancy dose related to weight, and autoimmunity as
independent ones, entered either alone or in combination. In the last
case a forward conditional method was used. Prepregnancy dose related
to weight was entered either as a continuous or dichotomous variable
(<1.6 µg/kg·day, less than replacement dose;
1.6
µg/kg·day, full replacement/suppressive dose).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
In the control group, 3 of 31 women (9.7%) presented a discordance in LT requirements at follow-up (P < 0.001 vs. patient group). One of them had a carcinoma and was required to increase her LT dose. The other 2, whose hypothyroidism was due to autoimmune thyroid disease, presented a pattern of hyperthyroidism, and in 1 of them it was preceded by hypothyroidism.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, in women with hypothyroidism antedating pregnancy, LT requirements differed from prepregnancy requirements in 67.7% of patients at some point of follow-up in the first year postpartum. This percentage of discordance was higher than that in patients with thyroid carcinoma followed after delivery (20%; P < 0.01) and higher than that in a control group of nonpregnant women of similar age and more recent diagnosis followed during a similar period of time (9.5%; P < 0.001).
As the number of TSH measurements was higher in the group of hypothyroid women after delivery, the higher percentage of LT dose discordance in this group could be attributed to this fact. The reason for more TSH measurements in the after delivery group is that a discordant TSH measurement led to an additional test. Besides, a 68% increase in TSH measurement cannot be responsible for a 5.7-fold increase in the rate of discordance. We ruled out potential causes of discordance between prepregnancy and postpartum LT dose. In cases of excessive therapy, pill ingestion immediately before blood drawing was ruled out. In cases of insufficient therapy, patients who had been carefully advised to take any multivitamin pill at least 3 h later than LT were asked about treatment noncompliance and drugs influencing LT absorption (8). Passage of LT to maternal milk could be suggested as an explanation, but it only amounts to 0.002 µg/L (17), and most mothers were not breastfeeding their babies by the time that TSH increased (6 months postpartum). Another potential explanation for increasing LT demands could be natural progression of hypothyroidism both in patients with Hashimotos thyroiditis and in patients with Graves disease after 131I therapy. This also does not seem to be the case, as we would expect a similar or even more important progression in the control women who had a shorter duration of the disease. Moreover, neither LT passage to maternal milk nor the natural progression of the disease would explain the situations of transient hyperthyroidism.
At this point, although we did not measure thyroid antibodies or radioactive iodine uptake, we suggest that postpartum lability in women receiving replacement LT therapy could be due to thyroiditis, as there is not an alternative explanation and the patterns of discordance are precisely those of postpartum thyroiditis. So, our interpretation is that women receiving replacement therapy can have a viable thyroid remnant (the prepregnancy dose is lower than full replacement one) (18) where thyroiditis can take place. By contrast, patients with hypothyroidism after ablative therapy for thyroid carcinoma would not be prone to this phenomenon, because residual thyroid tissue is absent, and this would explain the lower rate of discordant prepregnancy-postpartum LT requirements in this group. Nevertheless, two women with previous carcinoma (10%) presented changes in LT requirements postpartum. As the rate of discordance is the same as that in both control groups, we do not consider it postpartum related.
The overall 56% rate of postpartum LT discordance in this study is higher than the cumulative 9.3% incidence of postpartum thyroiditis in the background population (19), probably because the study group was clearly biased to higher risk.
Both recurrence (20, 21, 22) and silent thyroiditis (20, 23, 24, 25) are known to be very common in the first year after delivery of women with Graves disease in remission. An evident recurrence took place in one of the women with Graves disease, but in the other patients with previous Graves disease and transient hyperthyroidism, both recurrence and postpartum thyroiditis could be possible explanations.
Regarding the distribution of patterns of T4 dosage discordance, we cannot rule out the possibility of an undetected hyperthyroid phase in patients with a hypothyroidism pattern or even some undetected discordant cases, because thyroid function was not measured according to a standard schedule. In any case, the importance of this study lies in the presence of discordance rather than its specific pattern, and if there were any missing cases, they would probably increase the percentage of discordance in the noncarcinoma group. However, the 70% rate of postpartum discordance in women with autoimmune hypothyroidism is higher than the 45% rate of postpartum thyroid function test changes reported in women with thyroid antibodies in the first trimester of pregnancy (26). The explanation probably lies in the definition of discordance, as we have not taken into account peripheral thyroid hormones.
In conclusion, this study documents that women with hypothyroidism antedating pregnancy display changes in LT requirements during the first year after delivery that suggest postpartum thyroiditis. Confirmation of the pathogenesis of postpartum lability in LT dose would require a prospective study with control subjects matched for disease and years of hypothyroidism and measurement at fixed intervals of thyroid hormones, antibodies, and markers of thyroid destruction in both groups. However, being aware of the frequent transient changes that women with hypothyroidism experience in the first year postpartum has an immediate application in clinical practice. After delivery, LT therapy dose should be resumed with the prepregnancy dose, and it should not be modified unless the patient has distinct symptoms of hypo- or hyperthyroidism.
Received April 2, 1999.
Revised July 1, 1999.
Accepted August 2, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Glinoer and M. Abalovich Unresolved questions in managing hypothyroidism during pregnancy BMJ, August 11, 2007; 335(7614): 300 - 302. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Subsection Reports J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8_suppl): s8 - s47. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Abalovich, N. Amino, L. A. Barbour, R. H. Cobin, L. J. De Groot, D. Glinoer, S. J. Mandel, and A. Stagnaro-Green Management of Thyroid Dysfunction during Pregnancy and Postpartum: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8_suppl): s1 - s47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Hypothyroidism in the pregnant woman DTB, July 1, 2006; 44(7): 53 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Alexander, E. Marqusee, J. Lawrence, P. Jarolim, G. A. Fischer, and P. R. Larsen Timing and Magnitude of Increases in Levothyroxine Requirements during Pregnancy in Women with Hypothyroidism N. Engl. J. Med., July 15, 2004; 351(3): 241 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Muller, H. A. Drexhage, and A. Berghout Postpartum Thyroiditis and Autoimmune Thyroiditis in Women of Childbearing Age: Recent Insights and Consequences for Antenatal and Postnatal Care Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2001; 22(5): 605 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |