| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Istituto di Endocrinologia (D.P., V.R., D.E., A.B., A.A.S.) and Istituto di Patologia Generale ed Oncologia (C.A., G.A.P.), Seconda Università di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Antonio A. Sinisi, M.D., Istituto di Endocrinologia, Seconda Università di Napoli, Building 16, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy. E-mail: antonio.sinisi{at}unina2.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
genes in normal (N) and malignant (C) primary
cultures of human prostate epithelial cells (PEC) and fibroblasts (PFC)
and in the prostate tissue donors. Both ERß and ER
messenger
ribonucleic acids were found by RT-PCR analysis in six NPECs and normal
prostate tissues and in only one of six CPECs and in the
respective cancer tissue donor. The other five CPECs and related
cancer tissue donors and all normal and cancer PFCs expressed ER
messenger ribonucleic acid alone. Immunoblot analysis, using a
polyclonal anti-ERß (C-terminal) antibody, demonstrated ERß protein
in all NPEC lysates and in one of the six CPECs. ER
protein was
expressed in both NPECs and CPECs when a polyclonal antibody directed
against the ER
N-terminal domain was used. In contrast, ER
protein was not detected in two of the six CPEC lysates when ER
C-terminal monoclonal antibodies were used. Using a set of primers
designed to amplify the region from exons 68, RT-PCR analysis
demonstrated the absence of the expected transcript in these cells. The
present study shows that the ERß gene is expressed together with
ER
in normal prostates and NPECs, whereas it is barely detectable in
prostate cancer and CPECs. Moreover, in some CPECs, the ER
gene may
be transcribed in a changed protein, resulting from the expression of a
deletion variant. Together, these data suggest that prostate malignancy
is associated with a potential disorder of ER-mediated pathways. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(ER
) was thought to mediate the
genomic effects of 17ß-estradiol in mammalian tissues. Several
studies have consistently demonstrated that ER
is present in the
stromal compartment and at low levels in basal epithelial cells of
normal human prostate (9, 10, 11, 12, 13), suggesting that
estrogen-induced epithelial changes could be explained by a paracrine
interaction between stromal and epithelial cells. However, the cloning
and description of a gene encoding a second type of ER, ERß, in the
rat (14), mouse (15), and human
(16) suggested a reevaluation of the estrogen-signaling
system and function in the prostate. The newly identified ERß is
highly expressed in the epithelial components of the rat prostate gland
(17), but there is little evidence for its expression in
human prostate. Northern blot analysis failed to demonstrate ERß
messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) (16), and in
situ hybridization demonstrated a low level of ERß expression in
the epithelial cells (18). Using RT-PCR we
(19) and others (20) found the ERß
transcript in prostate epithelial cell cultures. The presence of ERß
protein in human prostate remains controversial. Bonkhoff et
al. (13) failed to demonstrate detectable ERß by
immunohistochemistry in normal and malignant tissues, whereas a recent
preliminary report immunolocalized the protein in basal epithelial
cells in normal tissue samples (21).
Here we evaluated ER
and ERß expression in prostate tissues and in
the stromal and epithelial cells from apparently pure primary cultures
prepared from human normal and cancerous prostate specimens. We
demonstrated a differential expression pattern of ERß and ER
mRNAs
and proteins between normal and cancerous prostate cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Normal human prostatic tissues were collected from patients who had undergone radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Prostate cancer tissues were obtained from patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy (Gleasons score 27). After prostatectomy, a wedge-shaped specimen of fresh prostate was removed. A sample of the tissue underwent pathological examination to confirm the prostatic origin, the diagnosis, and the absence of other diseases. Only specimens containing 100% normal or cancer prostate cells were used to establish primary cultures according to a previously described method (22). Briefly, prostate epithelial cells (EC) and fibroblasts (FC) were separated by different centrifugations of minced and collagenase (collagenase IV, Life Technologies, Inc.-BRL, Milan, Italy; 10 mg/mL)-digested tissues. The EC were plated on keratinocyte-serum-free medium (Life Technologies, Inc.-BRL, Milan, Italy) supplemented with bovine pituitary extract (10 mg/mL), epidermal growth factor (10 ng/mL), cholera toxin (10 ng/mL), 5% FCS, and antibiotics (fungizon and penicillin-streptomycin). The FC were cultured in MEM (Life Technologies, Inc.-BRL) supplemented with 10% FCS and antibiotics. At confluence, cultures were grown after ethylenediamine tetraacetate-trypsin treatment. Cell cultures were stained with monoclonal antibodies (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) specific for cytokeratin as a marker for EC and for vimentin for FC. At the first passage cultures were considered 100% pure if cytokeratin or vimentin immunostaining was positive in nearly 100% of cells for EC or FC, respectively. Both normal and malignant PECs showed positive immunoreactivity with cytokeratin 8 monoclonal antibody (Mab 35BH11, DAKO Corp., Milan, Italy), indicating their glandular origin (23). Basal cell-specific high molecular weight cytokeratin immunoreactivity (Mab 34BE12, DAKO Corp.) was found in normal cell cultures, demonstrating the presence of cells endowed with basal features (23). High molecular weight cytokeratin immunoreactivity was completely absent from the cells derived from prostate carcinoma. The prostate-specific antigen protein detection from conditioned medium by specific immunoassay and the immunoreactivity of cell monolayers to Mab clone ErPr8 (BioGenex Laboratories, Inc., San Ramon, CA) demonstrated that both normal and malignant short-term PECs retain prostate-specific antigen secretory function. The malignant nature of cells derived from prostate carcinomas was confirmed by a high expression of proliferative antigen Ki67 and, particularly, by a high expression of mutated p53 protein, demonstrated by immunoreactivity with monoclonal antibody clone Ki-67 (DAKO Corp.) and Pab 240 (Serotec, Delta Biological, Milan, Italy), respectively. Six cell strains from normal prostates and six from prostate cancer specimens were used in the experimental protocols that were repeated at least three times. All cultures were performed at 37 C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere in air.
mRNA isolation and RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from the cultures at the first passage
and from tissues. Total RNA was recovered with the RNAzol B kit
(Cinna/Biotecx Laboratories, Houston, TX). Residual DNA was removed by
ribonuclease-free deoxyribonuclease I treatment (Promega Corp., Florence, Italy). RT-PCR was carried out as previously
described (22). To obtain a negative control for the
amplification reactions we carried out an RNA transcription without
addition of reverse transcriptase. RNAs were reverse transcribed using
5 µg total RNA in the presence of reverse transcriptase (Superscript
-BRL-200 U) at 37 C for 1.5 h. The reaction was stopped by
incubation at 95 C for 5 min. Complementary DNA (600 ng) from RT of
RNAs was amplified in a total volume of 50 µL of 10 mmol Tris-HCl,
1.5 mmol MgCl2, 50 mmol KCl (pH 8.3), 100 ng of
primers, 0.2 mmol deoxynucleotides triphosphate, and 2.5 U
Taq DNA polymerase (Roche). A DNA thermal
cycler (Perkin-Elmer Corp./Cetus, Milan, Italy) was used
for the reaction. The following PCR conditions were used: 35 cycles of
amplification, 94 C for 1 min, 58 C for 1 min, and 72 C for 1 min.
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) primers (100 ng) were
added to each PCR reaction as an internal control, and the 876-bp
product of GAPDH was detected in each PCR reaction. The 5'-3'
oligonucleotides for ER
, ERß (24, 25), and GAPDH
(22) are shown in Table 1
.
The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose
gel and by comparing their sizes with the size expected from the gene
sequence. The identity of the products from representative reactions
was confirmed by direct sequencing of PCR products. The treatment with
deoxyribonuclease and the coamplification of the GAPDH gene containing
introns such as ER
and ERß genes excluded genomic DNA
contamination. Granulosa cell mRNA was used for the positive
control.
|
ER
and ERß protein levels were evaluated by Western blot
analysis of protein extracts made from six different strains of NPEC
and CPEC. Electrophoresis and immunoblotting procedures were performed
as previously described (22). For each cell strain 40 µg
total protein lysate were loaded. We used the following antibodies for
the primary immunoreactions: a polyclonal anti-ERß antibody [human
COOH-terminal (PAI-313 ABR, Inalco, Milan, Italy) or 210180-C050
(Alexis-Italia, Florence, Italy)], a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised
against N-terminal part of ER
(amino acids 154171,
Sigma, Milan, Italy), and a mixture of two monoclonal
antibodies (1602 and 1603) raised against a C-terminal complementary
DNA recombinant fragment of ER
(26). Antibody reaction
was revealed by a 45-min incubation at room temperature with
horseradish peroxide-coupled antigoat or antimouse IgG serum
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Milan, Italy), 1:10,000
diluted in Western blot buffer (pH 8.00) containing 1% nonfat dried
milk and 0.25% BSA. This was followed by a washing cycle using
chemiluminescent substrate (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturers instructions. The
visualization was obtained by autoradiography.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
region between exons 4
and 6, we found the ER
transcript in all epithelial and stromal cell
primary cultures and in all benign and malignant tissue samples. The
relative levels of ER
, ERß, and GAPDH gene products in
representative samples from normal and cancer prostate tissues and from
epithelial and stromal cell cultures are depicted in Fig. 2
was highly present in prostate cancer tissue and epithelial cells.
Immunoblot analysis of ERß protein in the EC culture lysates was
consistent with the RT-PCR data. In fact, we found ERß protein in all
NPECs (Figs. 3
protein we used a polyclonal N-terminal and two monoclonal C-terminal
anti-ER
antibodies. Representative results are shown in Figs. 5
protein was found in all normal and malignant epithelial cell
primary cultures with the N-terminal antibody (Fig. 5
protein was undetectable in two CPECs when we used a mixture of two
antibodies directed against the C-terminal portion (Fig. 6
transcript in
these two cell strains, when using a set of primers designed to amplify
the region between exons 6 and 8 of the ER
gene, coding for the
distal tract of the ligand-binding domain (Fig. 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ERß genes in normal prostate specimens and in normal epithelial
cells in primary cultures. The absence of ERß transcripts in the pure
culture of isolated fibroblasts is in agreement with the preferential
expression of ERß in the epithelial compartment of the human prostate
gland. This study also shows that ERß gene expression is frequently
lost in malignant prostate epithelial cell primary cultures and in
prostate cancer. ERß expression in human prostate has been addressed
in very few studies. Using RT-PCR, Lau et al.
(20) recently found the transcript of ERß alone in five
primary cultures of normal prostate epithelial cells and showed that
malignant prostate cell lines (PC-3, DU145, and LNCaP) express ERß
associated variably with the ER
subtype. The discrepancy between
these data and ours may be due to the different kinds of samples
examined. In fact, we used whole prostate tissue from surgical
specimens to establish primary cultures, while Lau used peripheral zone
samples obtained by ultrasound-guided biopsy. Moreover, we analyzed
malignant epithelial cell primary cultures, whereas they included only
prostate cancer cell lines. Although more attention has been focused on
the prostate cell lines, they remain a model system and not a perfect
in vivo model. We found the same ER expression pattern in
the primary cell cultures and in the tissue donors, confirming that
primary cultures at the first passages may closely reflect the
characteristics of tissues in vivo.
We demonstrated by immunoblotting that ERß protein is expressed
preferentially in normal epithelial cell primary cultures. The pattern
is consistent with the RT-PCR data. However, the levels of expression
of the protein are different among the samples examined. This may be
due to either transcriptional or posttranscriptional mechanisms.
Current immunohistochemistry studies of ERß in human prostate are
scarce and controversial. A preliminary report showed ERß protein
immunolocalization on epithelial cells of normal prostate sections
(21). Another study failed to demonstrate it in both
normal and malignant human prostates (13). It is well
known that imperfect antibody specificity, ineffective antigen
retrieval and tissue-processing methods, or the presence of unknown
isoforms may affect immunohistochemistry performance. Indeed, we found
ER
transcript and protein in all prostate cells analyzed, including
malignant ones. Several studies (9, 10, 11, 12, 27, 28, 29, 30) failed to
demonstrate ER
expression in prostate cancer. However, a recent
report (13) demonstrated ER
transcript and protein in
premalignant lesions and prostate adenocarcinomas. Our data are in
agreement with this finding and suggest that prostate epithelial cancer
cells potentially retain estrogen responsiveness via ER
. Moreover,
in two of six malignant epithelial cells in primary culture, we showed
an ER
gene expression variant involving exons 68, i.e.
the region coding for the distal portion of the ligand-binding domain.
The functional significance of ER
variants that we found in primary
cultured cancer cells and that others saw in prostate cancer cell lines
(20) remains unknown. It has been suggested that ER
variants found in breast cancer might be of clinical significance in
the development and progression of the disease (31).
Our observation implies that both ER subtypes may mediate possible direct effects of estrogens on normal epithelial prostate cells. Neoplastic transformation, however, is frequently associated with an impairment of estrogen action due to loss of ERß.
Two recent reports described a hypermethylated status of ER
gene in
prostate cancer cell lines that may be functionally relevant in ER
gene down-regulation (20, 32). To date, there are no data
on ERß gene methylation and its potential role in ERß silencing in
prostate cancer cells.
The exact roles of two ERs in human prostate are still unclear, and the
significance of the disappearance of ERß expression in human prostate
cancer remains to be determined. Distinct effects of the two ERs have
been demonstrated at AP-1-containing promoters, suggesting that the
balance of ER
and ERß may be crucial in the physiological response
to estrogens in several tissues (33, 34). A possible
implication of ERß in neoplastic growth control is suggested by the
findings of a selective loss of ERß protein in colon adenocarcinoma
and ovarian cancer (35). ERß seems to have a role in the
control of proliferation and the prevention of hyperplasia in the
rodent prostate, as ERß knockout mice show prostatic hyperplasia on
aging (36). The down-regulation of ERß might also be
associated with the loss of the antiproliferative effects of estrogens
on human prostate. This is probably mediated by the novel ER
subtype.
In conclusion, the present study suggests that estrogens may exert their effects on human prostate through ERß. Malignancy seems to be associated with a potential disorder of ERß-mediated pathways. Further investigations on estrogen action and ERß function may help us understand their roles in prostate carcinogenesis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 14, 2000.
Revised January 9, 2001.
Accepted January 17, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ß. Endocrinology. 138:863870.
and
ß in primary cultures of normal and malignant human prodstate
epithelial cells. Proceedings of the 81st Annual Meeting of The
Endocrine Society, San Diego, CA, 1999, p 264.
and ER-ß in normal and malignant
prostatic epithelial cells: regulation by methylation and involvement
in growth regulation. Cancer Res. 60:31753182.
variant messenger RNAs between normal human
breast tissue and primary breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 60:530533.
and ERß at
AP-1 sites. Science. 277:15081510.
and ß messenger RNA expression during
human breast tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 58:31973201.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. R. Setlur, K. D. Mertz, Y. Hoshida, F. Demichelis, M. Lupien, S. Perner, A. Sboner, Y. Pawitan, O. Andren, L. A. Johnson, et al. Estrogen-Dependent Signaling in a Molecularly Distinct Subclass of Aggressive Prostate Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, June 4, 2008; 100(11): 815 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K M Ho, J. Nanda, K. E Chapman, and F. K Habib Oestrogen and benign prostatic hyperplasia: effects on stromal cell proliferation and local formation from androgen J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 197(3): 483 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Chen, P. Kraft, P. Bretsky, S. Ketkar, D. J. Hunter, D. Albanes, D. Altshuler, G. Andriole, C. D. Berg, H. Boeing, et al. Sequence Variants of Estrogen Receptor {beta} and Risk of Prostate Cancer in the National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 1973 - 1981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stettner, S. Kaulfuss, P. Burfeind, S. Schweyer, A. Strauss, R.-H. Ringert, and P. Thelen The relevance of estrogen receptor-{beta} expression to the antiproliferative effects observed with histone deacetylase inhibitors and phytoestrogens in prostate cancer treatment Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2007; 6(10): 2626 - 2633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P Risbridger, S. J Ellem, and S. J McPherson Estrogen action on the prostate gland: a critical mix of endocrine and paracrine signaling J. Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 39(3): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D M Peehl Primary cell cultures as models of prostate cancer development Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2005; 12(1): 19 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-C. Li, P. R. Carroll, and R. Dahiya Epigenetic Changes in Prostate Cancer: Implication for Diagnosis and Treatment J Natl Cancer Inst, January 19, 2005; 97(2): 103 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Selva, O. M. Tirado, N. Toran, C. A. Suarez-Quian, J. Reventos, and F. Munell Estrogen Receptor {beta} Expression and Apoptosis of Spermatocytes of Mice Overexpressing a Rat Androgen-Binding Protein Transgene Biol Reprod, November 1, 2004; 71(5): 1461 - 1468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Bardin, N Boulle, G Lazennec, F Vignon, and P Pujol Loss of ER{beta} expression as a common step in estrogen-dependent tumor progression Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2004; 11(3): 537 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Imamov, A. Morani, G.-J. Shim, Y. Omoto, C. Thulin-Andersson, M. Warner, and J.-A. Gustafsson Estrogen receptor {beta} regulates epithelial cellular differentiation in the mouse ventral prostate PNAS, June 22, 2004; 101(25): 9375 - 9380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. M. Tirado, D. M. Selva, N. Toran, C. A. Suarez-Quian, M. Jansen, D. P. McDonnell, J. Reventos, and F. Munell Increased Expression of Estrogen Receptor {beta} in Pachytene Spermatocytes After Short-Term Methoxyacetic Acid Administration J Androl, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 84 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Pais, I. Leav, K.-M. Lau, Z. Jiang, and S.-M. Ho Estrogen Receptor-{beta} Expression in Human Testicular Germ Cell Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 9(12): 4475 - 4482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-M. Liu, C. Albanese, C. M. Anderson, K. Hilty, P. Webb, R. M. Uht, R. H. Price Jr., R. G. Pestell, and P. J. Kushner Opposing Action of Estrogen Receptors alpha and beta on Cyclin D1 Gene Expression J. Biol. Chem., June 28, 2002; 277(27): 24353 - 24360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Lobenhofer, L. Bennett, P. L. Cable, L. Li, P. R. Bushel, and C. A. Afshari Regulation of DNA Replication Fork Genes by 17{beta}-Estradiol Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2002; 16(6): 1215 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kuwajerwala, E. Cifuentes, S. Gautam, M. Menon, E. R. Barrack, and G. P. V. Reddy Resveratrol Induces Prostate Cancer Cell Entry into S Phase and Inhibits DNA Synthesis Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 62(9): 2488 - 2492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |