help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on March 25, 2008
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2496
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/6/2173    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sosa, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sosa, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Thyroid
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology

Submitted on November 9, 2007
Accepted on March 14, 2008

Calcitonin Measurement in the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules in the United States: A Cost-effectiveness and Decision Analysis

Kevin Cheung BEng, MSc, Sanziana A. Roman MD, Tracy S. Wang MD, MPH, Hugh D. Walker PhD, and Julie Ann Sosa MA, MD*

Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, Canada; Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Departments of Community Health and Epidemiology and Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: julie.sosa{at}yale.edu.

Context: European studies have shown that use of routine calcitonin screening for detection of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) in patients with thyroid nodules increases the detection of occult MTC and may improve patient outcomes. Calcitonin screening for MTC has not been recommended in recent U.S. practice guidelines.

Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of routine calcitonin screening in adult patients with thyroid nodules in the U.S.

Settings/Subjects: A decision model was developed for a hypothetical group of adult patients presenting for evaluation of thyroid nodules in the U.S. Patients were screened using current American Thyroid Association guidelines only, or American Thyroid Association guidelines with routine serum calcitonin screening. Input data were obtained from the literature, SEER and HCUP-NIS databases, and the Medicare Reimbursement Schedule. Sensitivity analyses were performed for a number of input variables.

Main Outcome Measures: Cost-effectiveness, measured in dollars per life years saved ($/LYS).

Results: Addition of calcitonin screening to current American Thyroid Association guidelines for the evaluation of thyroid nodules would cost $11,793/LYS ($10,941–12,646/LYS). When extrapolated to the national level, calcitonin screening for MTC in the U.S. would yield an additional 113,000 life-years at a cost increase of 5.3%. Calcitonin screening cost-effectiveness is sensitive to patient age and gender, and to changes in disease prevalence, specificity of fine needle aspiration and calcitonin testing, calcitonin screening level, costs of testing, and length of follow-up.

Conclusions: Routine serum calcitonin screening in patients undergoing evaluation for thyroid nodules appears to be cost-effective in the U.S., with cost-effectiveness comparable to measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone, colonoscopy, and mammography screening.


Key words: Medullary thyroid cancer • calcitonin • cost-effectiveness




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Cost effectiveness of calcitonin for thyroid nodules
Yair Liel
JCEM Online, 5 Aug 2008 [Full text]
Response to Letter
Julie Ann Sosa, et al.
JCEM Online, 9 Sep 2008 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society