help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on April 1, 2008
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2825
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/6/2194    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leboeuf, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fagin, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leboeuf, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fagin, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Thyroid
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology

Submitted on December 26, 2007
Accepted on March 25, 2008

BRAFV600E mutation is associated with preferential sensitivity to MEK inhibition in thyroid cancer cell lines

Rebecca Leboeuf, Jacqueline E. Baumgartner, Miriam Benezra, Roberta Malaguarnera, David Solit, Christine A. Pratilas, Neal Rosen, Jeffrey A. Knauf, and James A. Fagin*

Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Programs in Human Oncology and Pathogenesis, and Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: faginj{at}mskcc.org.

Context: Mutually exclusive mutations of RET, RAS or BRAF are present in ~70% of papillary thyroid carcinomas, whereas only the latter two are seen in poorly-differentiated and anaplastic cancers. Although the signal output common to these oncoproteins is ERK, a recent report showed that only BRAF mutations consistently predicted responsiveness to MEK inhibitors.

Objectives: Here we investigated whether sensitivity to MEK inhibition was determined by oncogene status in 13 human thyroid cancer cell lines: 4 with BRAF mutations, 4 RAS, 1 RET/PTC1, and 4 wild-type (WT).

Results: Growth of BRAF (+) cells was inhibited by the MEK antagonist PD0325901 with an IC50 of < 5 nM. By contrast, RAS, RET/PTC1 or WT cells had IC50 of 4 to > 1000 nM. Sensitivity was not predicted by coexisting mutations in PIK3CA or by PTEN status. Similar effects were obtained with the MEK inhibitor AZD6244. PD0325901 induced a sustained G1/S arrest in BRAF (+) but not BRAF (-) lines. PD0325901 was equipotent at inhibiting pERK1/2 after 2 h regardless of genetic background, but pERK rebounded at 24 h in most lines. MEKi-resistance was associated with partial refractoriness of pERK to further inhibition by the compounds. AZD6244 was more potent at inhibiting growth of NPA (BRAF +) than Cal62 (KRAS +) xenografts.

Conclusion: Thyroid cancers with BRAF mutation may be preferentially sensitive to MEK inhibitors, whereas tumors with other MEK-ERK effector gene mutations may have variable responses, either because they are only partially dependent on ERK, and/or because feedback responses elicit partial refractoriness to MEK inhibition.


Key words: BRAF mutation • thyroid cancer • MEK-ERK pathway • MEK inhibition







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society