| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on February 28, 2008
Accepted on May 27, 2008
Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Tumors (S.L., J.L., E.B., M.S.), Radiology (C.D., T.D.B.), Epidemiology (A.L.V., A.A.), Digestive Oncology (D.M., M.D.), Pathology (P.D.), Oncologic Surgery (D.M.H. D.E.), Medical Oncology (J.G.), Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: leboulleux{at}igr.fr.
PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity of whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) for the diagnosis of bone metastases (BM) in patients with well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine cancer (WD-GEP-EC) and to determine predictive factors of BM.
PATIENTS-METHODS: WB-MRI and SRS were prospectively performed in 79 patients with bronchial (11), thymic (5), gastric (2), duodeno-pancreatic (24), ileal (26), colic (1), or unknown primary (10) WD-GEP-EC.
RESULTS: 36 patients (46%) had 333 BM involving 119 skeletal segments. WB-MRI and SRS were equally sensitive for detecting patients with BM (86% vs. 81%, P=0.56) with 33% of the patients diagnosed with only one procedure. WB-MRI detected more BM than SRS (80% vs. 57%, P=0.017). Compared to SRS, WB-MRI detected more spine BM (96% vs. 45%, P<0.001) and tended to detect more pelvic and lower limb BM (P=0.054 and P=0.06, respectively). Compared to WB-MRI, SRS detected more skull BM (100% vs. 0%, P<0.001) and tended to detect more rib BM (P=0.08). Sternal and upper limb BM were equally detected with WB-MRI and SRS (P=0.32 and P=0.46, respectively)
Bone staging with SRS and spine MRI rather than WB-MRI would have detected 92% of the patients with BM and 83% of all BM. The extent of liver involvement and bronchial-thymic primary tumors were independent predictive factors for BM.
CONCLUSION: We recommend bone staging with SRS and spine MRI in all patients with bronchial-thymic or unknown primary WD-GEP-EC. In case of duodeno-pancreatic or ileal primary, bone imaging may be restricted to patients with liver metastases.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |